{"title":"中国会计-国家-市场动态研究:文献综述与研究议程","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accounting has long been studied as a social and institutional practice structured by the actions of state agencies and market forces. Such studies are increasingly conducted in non-Western jurisdictions. This paper presents a review of extant studies investigating the dynamic connections among accounting, state agencies, and markets in modern China. Our aim is to critically evaluate extant literature, synthesize its insights, and open up new research avenues. We examine 92 accounting studies, which have been inductively classified into three distinctive thematic clusters. In so doing, three major features of current research are identified: first, an emphasis on the inexorable power of Chinese state agencies; second, a focus on national relations among accounting, state, and market; and third, a lack of attention to how accounting functions in specific local settings. Consequently, key research opportunities lie in (a) deeper theorization of the hybridity of China's state-market mix, (b) analysis of the local-global networks in which hybridity circulates and is manifested, and (c) contemporary studies of accounting in action in a Chinese context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924002087/pdfft?md5=29eb611927ad3e897120a22513671c66&pid=1-s2.0-S0890838924002087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Researching the accounting-state-market dynamic in China: A literature review and research agenda\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accounting has long been studied as a social and institutional practice structured by the actions of state agencies and market forces. Such studies are increasingly conducted in non-Western jurisdictions. This paper presents a review of extant studies investigating the dynamic connections among accounting, state agencies, and markets in modern China. Our aim is to critically evaluate extant literature, synthesize its insights, and open up new research avenues. We examine 92 accounting studies, which have been inductively classified into three distinctive thematic clusters. In so doing, three major features of current research are identified: first, an emphasis on the inexorable power of Chinese state agencies; second, a focus on national relations among accounting, state, and market; and third, a lack of attention to how accounting functions in specific local settings. Consequently, key research opportunities lie in (a) deeper theorization of the hybridity of China's state-market mix, (b) analysis of the local-global networks in which hybridity circulates and is manifested, and (c) contemporary studies of accounting in action in a Chinese context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Accounting Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924002087/pdfft?md5=29eb611927ad3e897120a22513671c66&pid=1-s2.0-S0890838924002087-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924002087\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838924002087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Researching the accounting-state-market dynamic in China: A literature review and research agenda
Accounting has long been studied as a social and institutional practice structured by the actions of state agencies and market forces. Such studies are increasingly conducted in non-Western jurisdictions. This paper presents a review of extant studies investigating the dynamic connections among accounting, state agencies, and markets in modern China. Our aim is to critically evaluate extant literature, synthesize its insights, and open up new research avenues. We examine 92 accounting studies, which have been inductively classified into three distinctive thematic clusters. In so doing, three major features of current research are identified: first, an emphasis on the inexorable power of Chinese state agencies; second, a focus on national relations among accounting, state, and market; and third, a lack of attention to how accounting functions in specific local settings. Consequently, key research opportunities lie in (a) deeper theorization of the hybridity of China's state-market mix, (b) analysis of the local-global networks in which hybridity circulates and is manifested, and (c) contemporary studies of accounting in action in a Chinese context.
期刊介绍:
The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.