唇腭裂手术围手术期神经阻滞系统回顾

Q4 Medicine
R. Kerur, Binita N. Mallapur, Purvashree Deshmukh, Rajesh Powar
{"title":"唇腭裂手术围手术期神经阻滞系统回顾","authors":"R. Kerur, Binita N. Mallapur, Purvashree Deshmukh, Rajesh Powar","doi":"10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_470_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n Establishing a successful perioperative technique for better outcomes remains a priority in cleft surgery. In the present review, the safety and efficacy of nerve blocks for cleft lip and cleft palate are evaluated. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the perioperative nerve block was conducted. PubMed, Google Scholar databases, and manual searching were performed to screen the eligible RCTs. Dosage and the route of administration of anesthetics were considered for all the studies. A total of nine RCTs with 568 children were included in our review. Six out of nine studies reported cleft lip surgery, only two reported cleft palate surgery, and one study reported both cleft lip and palate surgery. Lignocaine, ropivacaine, or bupivacaine was used as anesthetics. Adrenaline or epinephrine was used as adjuvants. Post-operative pain was lower in the perioperative nerve block group compared to the comparison group, resulting in fewer emergency analgesic prescriptions. Physiological factors like heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate did not differ between groups. There were fewer adverse outcomes linked with perioperative nerve blocks. Perioperative nerve blocks can be a useful adjunct to general anesthesia in cleft lip and palate surgeries to provide additional pain relief and reduce opioid use, but they should be used judiciously and with consideration of potential risks and complications.","PeriodicalId":18412,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth","volume":"157 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Perioperative Nerve Blocks for Cleft Lip and Palate Surgeries\",\"authors\":\"R. Kerur, Binita N. Mallapur, Purvashree Deshmukh, Rajesh Powar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_470_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n Establishing a successful perioperative technique for better outcomes remains a priority in cleft surgery. In the present review, the safety and efficacy of nerve blocks for cleft lip and cleft palate are evaluated. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the perioperative nerve block was conducted. PubMed, Google Scholar databases, and manual searching were performed to screen the eligible RCTs. Dosage and the route of administration of anesthetics were considered for all the studies. A total of nine RCTs with 568 children were included in our review. Six out of nine studies reported cleft lip surgery, only two reported cleft palate surgery, and one study reported both cleft lip and palate surgery. Lignocaine, ropivacaine, or bupivacaine was used as anesthetics. Adrenaline or epinephrine was used as adjuvants. Post-operative pain was lower in the perioperative nerve block group compared to the comparison group, resulting in fewer emergency analgesic prescriptions. Physiological factors like heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate did not differ between groups. There were fewer adverse outcomes linked with perioperative nerve blocks. Perioperative nerve blocks can be a useful adjunct to general anesthesia in cleft lip and palate surgeries to provide additional pain relief and reduce opioid use, but they should be used judiciously and with consideration of potential risks and complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth\",\"volume\":\"157 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_470_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_470_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 建立成功的围手术期技术以获得更好的疗效仍是唇裂手术的首要任务。本综述评估了神经阻滞治疗唇裂和腭裂的安全性和有效性。我们对涉及围手术期神经阻滞的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾。通过 PubMed、Google Scholar 数据库和人工检索筛选出符合条件的 RCT。所有研究均考虑了麻醉剂的剂量和给药途径。我们共纳入了 9 项研究,涉及 568 名儿童。9 项研究中有 6 项报告了唇裂手术,只有 2 项报告了腭裂手术,1 项报告了唇裂和腭裂手术。麻醉剂使用的是利多卡因、罗哌卡因或布比卡因。肾上腺素或肾上腺素被用作辅助剂。与对比组相比,围手术期神经阻滞组的术后疼痛较轻,因此减少了紧急镇痛处方。各组之间的心率、血压和呼吸频率等生理因素没有差异。与围手术期神经阻滞有关的不良后果较少。围手术期神经阻滞可作为唇腭裂手术全身麻醉的有效辅助手段,提供额外的镇痛效果并减少阿片类药物的使用,但应谨慎使用,并考虑到潜在的风险和并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of Perioperative Nerve Blocks for Cleft Lip and Palate Surgeries
ABSTRACT Establishing a successful perioperative technique for better outcomes remains a priority in cleft surgery. In the present review, the safety and efficacy of nerve blocks for cleft lip and cleft palate are evaluated. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the perioperative nerve block was conducted. PubMed, Google Scholar databases, and manual searching were performed to screen the eligible RCTs. Dosage and the route of administration of anesthetics were considered for all the studies. A total of nine RCTs with 568 children were included in our review. Six out of nine studies reported cleft lip surgery, only two reported cleft palate surgery, and one study reported both cleft lip and palate surgery. Lignocaine, ropivacaine, or bupivacaine was used as anesthetics. Adrenaline or epinephrine was used as adjuvants. Post-operative pain was lower in the perioperative nerve block group compared to the comparison group, resulting in fewer emergency analgesic prescriptions. Physiological factors like heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate did not differ between groups. There were fewer adverse outcomes linked with perioperative nerve blocks. Perioperative nerve blocks can be a useful adjunct to general anesthesia in cleft lip and palate surgeries to provide additional pain relief and reduce opioid use, but they should be used judiciously and with consideration of potential risks and complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
43 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信