在使用全聚乙烯髋臼部件的解剖型全肩关节置换术中,聚乙烯磨损率与髋臼植入物较早失效有关

Q4 Medicine
Isadora D. Guarino MD, MEng , Peter J. Shaughnessy MD , Jacob S. Torrey MD , John-Erik Bell MD, MS , Douglas W. Van Citters PhD
{"title":"在使用全聚乙烯髋臼部件的解剖型全肩关节置换术中,聚乙烯磨损率与髋臼植入物较早失效有关","authors":"Isadora D. Guarino MD, MEng ,&nbsp;Peter J. Shaughnessy MD ,&nbsp;Jacob S. Torrey MD ,&nbsp;John-Erik Bell MD, MS ,&nbsp;Douglas W. Van Citters PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Glenoid component loosening is the most common cause of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty failure, and osteolysis is a common intraoperative and radiographic finding associated with these failed arthroplasties. While preclinical testing can estimate failure mode and wear rates in the laboratory, there is limited in vivo data measuring polyethylene wear rate and location.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an institutional review board–approved total joint arthroplasty retrieval collection, 56 cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components from eleven different manufacturers were analyzed for in vivo dimensional change. We used the differential thickness measurement between the anteroposterior and superoinferior axes of each radially symmetrical implant to determine the dimensional change along that axis. A physiologic wear vector was determined for each retrieved device.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The implants had a median dimensional change of 0.13 mm/year (range 0.01-1.01mm/year) and the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles were 0.060 and 0.22 mm/year, respectively. The average time to revision of devices with &lt;0.1mm/year of wear was 140.9 months, while the averages for devices between 0.1-0.2mm/year and ≥0.2mm/year were 80.7 and 54.0 months, respectively. Devices with ≥0.2mm/year of wear had significantly shorter time to revision than those with &lt;0.1mm/year (<em>P</em> = .0006). The devices had a similar material loss distribution in both superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions, with 29 (52%) devices having a greater material loss in the superior-inferior distribution and the remaining 27 (48%) devices in the anterior-posterior axis. The physiologic wear vector had a mean of 47.3 degrees, with a relatively even distribution across all angles, suggesting that glenoid component loosening can occur along multiple axes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We conclude that polyethylene wear is a contributing factor for early failure of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid implants and that anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty may benefit from advances in polyethylene processing. We also suggest that in vitro testing of new polymers and designs should incorporate motion vectors beyond the traditional IS rocking horse test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 893-899"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rate of polyethylene wear correlates with earlier glenoid implant failure in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components\",\"authors\":\"Isadora D. Guarino MD, MEng ,&nbsp;Peter J. Shaughnessy MD ,&nbsp;Jacob S. Torrey MD ,&nbsp;John-Erik Bell MD, MS ,&nbsp;Douglas W. Van Citters PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Glenoid component loosening is the most common cause of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty failure, and osteolysis is a common intraoperative and radiographic finding associated with these failed arthroplasties. While preclinical testing can estimate failure mode and wear rates in the laboratory, there is limited in vivo data measuring polyethylene wear rate and location.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an institutional review board–approved total joint arthroplasty retrieval collection, 56 cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components from eleven different manufacturers were analyzed for in vivo dimensional change. We used the differential thickness measurement between the anteroposterior and superoinferior axes of each radially symmetrical implant to determine the dimensional change along that axis. A physiologic wear vector was determined for each retrieved device.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The implants had a median dimensional change of 0.13 mm/year (range 0.01-1.01mm/year) and the 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles were 0.060 and 0.22 mm/year, respectively. The average time to revision of devices with &lt;0.1mm/year of wear was 140.9 months, while the averages for devices between 0.1-0.2mm/year and ≥0.2mm/year were 80.7 and 54.0 months, respectively. Devices with ≥0.2mm/year of wear had significantly shorter time to revision than those with &lt;0.1mm/year (<em>P</em> = .0006). The devices had a similar material loss distribution in both superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions, with 29 (52%) devices having a greater material loss in the superior-inferior distribution and the remaining 27 (48%) devices in the anterior-posterior axis. The physiologic wear vector had a mean of 47.3 degrees, with a relatively even distribution across all angles, suggesting that glenoid component loosening can occur along multiple axes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We conclude that polyethylene wear is a contributing factor for early failure of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid implants and that anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty may benefit from advances in polyethylene processing. We also suggest that in vitro testing of new polymers and designs should incorporate motion vectors beyond the traditional IS rocking horse test.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 893-899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rate of polyethylene wear correlates with earlier glenoid implant failure in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components

Background

Glenoid component loosening is the most common cause of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty failure, and osteolysis is a common intraoperative and radiographic finding associated with these failed arthroplasties. While preclinical testing can estimate failure mode and wear rates in the laboratory, there is limited in vivo data measuring polyethylene wear rate and location.

Methods

Using an institutional review board–approved total joint arthroplasty retrieval collection, 56 cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components from eleven different manufacturers were analyzed for in vivo dimensional change. We used the differential thickness measurement between the anteroposterior and superoinferior axes of each radially symmetrical implant to determine the dimensional change along that axis. A physiologic wear vector was determined for each retrieved device.

Results

The implants had a median dimensional change of 0.13 mm/year (range 0.01-1.01mm/year) and the 25th and 75th percentiles were 0.060 and 0.22 mm/year, respectively. The average time to revision of devices with <0.1mm/year of wear was 140.9 months, while the averages for devices between 0.1-0.2mm/year and ≥0.2mm/year were 80.7 and 54.0 months, respectively. Devices with ≥0.2mm/year of wear had significantly shorter time to revision than those with <0.1mm/year (P = .0006). The devices had a similar material loss distribution in both superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions, with 29 (52%) devices having a greater material loss in the superior-inferior distribution and the remaining 27 (48%) devices in the anterior-posterior axis. The physiologic wear vector had a mean of 47.3 degrees, with a relatively even distribution across all angles, suggesting that glenoid component loosening can occur along multiple axes.

Conclusion

We conclude that polyethylene wear is a contributing factor for early failure of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid implants and that anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty may benefit from advances in polyethylene processing. We also suggest that in vitro testing of new polymers and designs should incorporate motion vectors beyond the traditional IS rocking horse test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信