使用等动测力计评估不同肘关节屈伸角度和运动速度下主动和被动模式下的关节位置感知

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Yi-Jung Tsai , Ting-Chien Tsai , Tzu-Chun Chung , Chih-Kun Hsiao , Yuan-Kun Tu
{"title":"使用等动测力计评估不同肘关节屈伸角度和运动速度下主动和被动模式下的关节位置感知","authors":"Yi-Jung Tsai ,&nbsp;Ting-Chien Tsai ,&nbsp;Tzu-Chun Chung ,&nbsp;Chih-Kun Hsiao ,&nbsp;Yuan-Kun Tu","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Joint position sense is the ability to detect body segment position in space and is commonly used to represent proprioceptive performance. The isokinetic dynamometer is frequently used to evaluate elbow joint position sense during active and passive reproduction tasks with various testing protocols. However, few studies have reported the performance of joint position sense under different testing conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare elbow joint position sense between active and passive reproduction tasks under different matching speeds and reference targets.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty participants without a history of upper-extremity surgery or neuromuscular diseases that affect the joint position sense of the elbow. Active and passive ipsilateral matching tasks were performed at four movement speeds (0.5°/s, 1°/s, 2°/s, and 4°/s) and three reference targets (elbow flexion at 0°–15°, 45°–60°, and 75°–90°), using an isokinetic dynamometer. The absolute and variable errors of each condition were calculated for comparison.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In active matching task with elbow flexion of 0°–15°, the absolute error at 0.5°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s and 4°/s, while the variable error at 1°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s. However, no differences were found at elbow flexion angles of 45°–60° and 75°–90°. Larger absolute errors were found at 4°/s with three testing angles in passive matching task.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study compared the joint position sense errors under various testing conditions in the active and passive reproduction tasks. The movement speeds and target position effects should be considered during evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 103153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of joint position sense in active and passive modes with various elbow flexion angles and movement speeds using an isokinetic dynamometer\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Jung Tsai ,&nbsp;Ting-Chien Tsai ,&nbsp;Tzu-Chun Chung ,&nbsp;Chih-Kun Hsiao ,&nbsp;Yuan-Kun Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Joint position sense is the ability to detect body segment position in space and is commonly used to represent proprioceptive performance. The isokinetic dynamometer is frequently used to evaluate elbow joint position sense during active and passive reproduction tasks with various testing protocols. However, few studies have reported the performance of joint position sense under different testing conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare elbow joint position sense between active and passive reproduction tasks under different matching speeds and reference targets.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty participants without a history of upper-extremity surgery or neuromuscular diseases that affect the joint position sense of the elbow. Active and passive ipsilateral matching tasks were performed at four movement speeds (0.5°/s, 1°/s, 2°/s, and 4°/s) and three reference targets (elbow flexion at 0°–15°, 45°–60°, and 75°–90°), using an isokinetic dynamometer. The absolute and variable errors of each condition were calculated for comparison.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In active matching task with elbow flexion of 0°–15°, the absolute error at 0.5°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s and 4°/s, while the variable error at 1°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s. However, no differences were found at elbow flexion angles of 45°–60° and 75°–90°. Larger absolute errors were found at 4°/s with three testing angles in passive matching task.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study compared the joint position sense errors under various testing conditions in the active and passive reproduction tasks. The movement speeds and target position effects should be considered during evaluation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002480\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景关节位置感是指检测身体在空间中的位置的能力,通常用来表示本体感觉性能。等动测力计常用于评估肘关节在主动和被动再现任务中的位置感,测试方案多种多样。目的比较在不同匹配速度和参考目标下主动和被动再现任务中的肘关节位置感。方法20名没有上肢手术史或影响肘关节位置感的神经肌肉疾病的参与者。使用等动测力计,在四种运动速度(0.5°/s、1°/s、2°/s 和 4°/s)和三个参考目标(肘关节屈曲 0°-15°、45°-60° 和 75°-90°)下进行主动和被动同侧匹配任务。结果在肘关节屈曲 0°-15°的主动匹配任务中,0.5°/秒时的绝对误差明显大于 2°/秒和 4°/秒时的误差,而 1°/秒时的可变误差明显大于 2°/秒时的误差。然而,在屈肘角度为 45°-60°和 75°-90°时则没有发现差异。结论 本研究比较了主动和被动再现任务中不同测试条件下的关节位置感误差。在评估过程中应考虑运动速度和目标位置的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of joint position sense in active and passive modes with various elbow flexion angles and movement speeds using an isokinetic dynamometer

Background

Joint position sense is the ability to detect body segment position in space and is commonly used to represent proprioceptive performance. The isokinetic dynamometer is frequently used to evaluate elbow joint position sense during active and passive reproduction tasks with various testing protocols. However, few studies have reported the performance of joint position sense under different testing conditions.

Objective

To compare elbow joint position sense between active and passive reproduction tasks under different matching speeds and reference targets.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Methods

Twenty participants without a history of upper-extremity surgery or neuromuscular diseases that affect the joint position sense of the elbow. Active and passive ipsilateral matching tasks were performed at four movement speeds (0.5°/s, 1°/s, 2°/s, and 4°/s) and three reference targets (elbow flexion at 0°–15°, 45°–60°, and 75°–90°), using an isokinetic dynamometer. The absolute and variable errors of each condition were calculated for comparison.

Results

In active matching task with elbow flexion of 0°–15°, the absolute error at 0.5°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s and 4°/s, while the variable error at 1°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s. However, no differences were found at elbow flexion angles of 45°–60° and 75°–90°. Larger absolute errors were found at 4°/s with three testing angles in passive matching task.

Conclusions

This study compared the joint position sense errors under various testing conditions in the active and passive reproduction tasks. The movement speeds and target position effects should be considered during evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信