使用 Naive Bayes 和 KNN 对社交媒体上公众对讽刺笑话的反应进行情感分析

Rasyid Ihsan Putra Selian, Anik vega Vitianingsih, Slamet Kacung, Anastasia Lidya Maukar, Jack Febrian Rusdi
{"title":"使用 Naive Bayes 和 KNN 对社交媒体上公众对讽刺笑话的反应进行情感分析","authors":"Rasyid Ihsan Putra Selian, Anik vega Vitianingsih, Slamet Kacung, Anastasia Lidya Maukar, Jack Febrian Rusdi","doi":"10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.13721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the use of Satire Joke as a humorous communication style in conveying criticism of the government through social media. Satire Joke is often used to depict the government's inability to address important social issues, such as slow bureaucratic processes and unfulfilled political promises. The aim of this research is to analyze public sentiment towards Satire Joke expressed on the YouTube social media platform. The methods used in this study are Naïve Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) due to their effectiveness in data classification. The results of this study are expected to help gain an understanding of social issues for the community and public knowledge. This research is also expected to contribute to the development of sentiment analysis methods in the future. The analysis results show that 400 data have neutral sentiment, 850 data have negative sentiment, and 947 data have positive sentiment. Based on testing, both Naive Bayes and KNN methods show good performance. The Naive Bayes method achieved the best accuracy of 90.29%, while the KNN method achieved an accuracy of 60.75%.","PeriodicalId":34046,"journal":{"name":"Sinkron","volume":"334 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentiment Analysis of Public Responses on Social Media to Satire Joke Using Naive Bayes and KNN\",\"authors\":\"Rasyid Ihsan Putra Selian, Anik vega Vitianingsih, Slamet Kacung, Anastasia Lidya Maukar, Jack Febrian Rusdi\",\"doi\":\"10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.13721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the use of Satire Joke as a humorous communication style in conveying criticism of the government through social media. Satire Joke is often used to depict the government's inability to address important social issues, such as slow bureaucratic processes and unfulfilled political promises. The aim of this research is to analyze public sentiment towards Satire Joke expressed on the YouTube social media platform. The methods used in this study are Naïve Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) due to their effectiveness in data classification. The results of this study are expected to help gain an understanding of social issues for the community and public knowledge. This research is also expected to contribute to the development of sentiment analysis methods in the future. The analysis results show that 400 data have neutral sentiment, 850 data have negative sentiment, and 947 data have positive sentiment. Based on testing, both Naive Bayes and KNN methods show good performance. The Naive Bayes method achieved the best accuracy of 90.29%, while the KNN method achieved an accuracy of 60.75%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sinkron\",\"volume\":\"334 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sinkron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.13721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sinkron","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.13721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了 "讽刺玩笑 "作为一种幽默的交流方式,在通过社交媒体传达对政府的批评时的使用情况。讽刺笑话经常被用来描述政府无力解决重要的社会问题,如缓慢的官僚程序和未兑现的政治承诺。本研究旨在分析公众对 YouTube 社交媒体平台上表达的讽刺笑话的看法。由于 Naïve Bayes 和 K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) 在数据分类方面的有效性,本研究采用了这两种方法。本研究的结果有望帮助社区和公众了解社会问题。这项研究也有望为未来情感分析方法的发展做出贡献。分析结果显示,400 个数据具有中性情感,850 个数据具有负面情感,947 个数据具有正面情感。根据测试结果,Naive Bayes 和 KNN 方法都表现出了良好的性能。Naive Bayes 方法的准确率最高,达到 90.29%,而 KNN 方法的准确率为 60.75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentiment Analysis of Public Responses on Social Media to Satire Joke Using Naive Bayes and KNN
This study examines the use of Satire Joke as a humorous communication style in conveying criticism of the government through social media. Satire Joke is often used to depict the government's inability to address important social issues, such as slow bureaucratic processes and unfulfilled political promises. The aim of this research is to analyze public sentiment towards Satire Joke expressed on the YouTube social media platform. The methods used in this study are Naïve Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) due to their effectiveness in data classification. The results of this study are expected to help gain an understanding of social issues for the community and public knowledge. This research is also expected to contribute to the development of sentiment analysis methods in the future. The analysis results show that 400 data have neutral sentiment, 850 data have negative sentiment, and 947 data have positive sentiment. Based on testing, both Naive Bayes and KNN methods show good performance. The Naive Bayes method achieved the best accuracy of 90.29%, while the KNN method achieved an accuracy of 60.75%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信