A hidden element governing immunogenicity in tumoral neoepitopes

The search for what characteristics define an epitope as either an immunogenic or a non-responsive target for immunotherapy has eluded researchers for years. Several studies demonstrate that certain positions in the peptide sequences, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) anchor residues, have a preferential composition of amino acids (allelic motifs), being those epitopes more likely to display a better immunogenic response. First of all, not all MHC ligands are immunogenic, considering that unnumbered self-epitopes are continuously presented on the cell surfaces. In this work, we analyzed data to evaluate an additional element, central to our hypothesis that alterations in tumor protein sequences result in a structural change that shifts the electrostatic surface of the peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules, pivotal for T-Cell receptor (TCR) recognition and the initiation of an immunogenic response. Firstly, previously neoepitope sequences presenting differential immune responses when compared with their wild-type counterparts were recovered. Even though the sequences were very similar, they triggered responses that were considerably different, and currently, there is no well-established explanation for why they conspicuously differ in immunogenic aspects from each other. The pMHCs structures harboring the epitope sequences were modeled and then used to generate images of their electrostatic surfaces, looking for qualitative differences that indicate the distinct responses. We noticed that no significant alteration occurred between immunogenic tumor peptides and their wild-type non-immunogenic counterparts when comparing their electrostatic surface. An additional comparison was made against structures of pMHCs containing immunogenic epitopes recovered from the Crosstope Database (https://crosstope.com.br/). In this sense, it was also possible to verify if immunogenic tumor epitopes were similar to viral immunogenic ones. Surprisingly, both wild-type (WT) sequences and neoepitopes shared an electrostatic surface distribution with pathogen targets, which could indicate their immunogenic predisposition. So we theorized that a “hidden element” may be responsible for the immunogenicity shift in neoepitopes.