普洛明燃煤热电厂(克罗地亚伊斯特拉)周围表土的辐射风险和终生致癌风险,以及停止使用放射性核素活度升高的煤炭后的长期影响

IF 5.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"普洛明燃煤热电厂(克罗地亚伊斯特拉)周围表土的辐射风险和终生致癌风险,以及停止使用放射性核素活度升高的煤炭后的长期影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.coal.2024.104576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Radiological and health risks arising from <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K in topsoil due to coal combustion in Plomin thermal power plant were assessed: outdoor absorbed dose rate in air (<em>D</em>), annual outdoor effective dose rate (<em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>), external hazard index (<em>H</em><sub>ex</sub>), internal hazard index (<em>H</em><sub>in</sub>), and excess lifetime cancer risk outdoors (<em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub>). Spatial distribution of risks around the plant was studied and relative contributions of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K to <em>D</em> (applies to <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub> and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub> as well), <em>H</em><sub>ex</sub>, and <em>H</em><sub>in</sub> were determined. The risks were studied at two soil depths (A: 0–10 cm, B: 10–25 cm), radially around the plant at 1 km, 5 km, and 10 km distances from the plant, and in a downwind (SW) profile at 0.1–1 km distance from the plant. Elevated <em>D</em>, <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>, <em>H</em><sub>in</sub>, and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub> were determined, while <em>H</em><sub>ex</sub> was not elevated. Almost all <em>D</em>, <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>, and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub> values were above the world average for soils (58 nGy/h, 0.07 mSv/y, and 0.29 × 10<sup>−3</sup>, respectively). <em>D</em>, <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>, and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub> were: 32–338 nGy/h (mean value: 116 nGy/h), 0.039–0.414 mSv/y (mean value: 0.142 mSv/y), and 0.17 × 10<sup>−3</sup>–1.79 × 10<sup>−3</sup> (mean value: 0.61 × 10<sup>−3</sup>), respectively. <em>H</em><sub>ex</sub> was in the 0.18–1.98 range (mean value: 0.69), with only two extreme values above the recommended limit of 1. <em>H</em><sub>in</sub> was in the 0.22–3.67 range (mean value: 1.02), with most of the values above the recommended limit of 1 in the downwind profile and at one station with extremes (1 km from the plant). A “hot spot” was determined for all risks at 1 km distance from the plant in the wind direction (SW from the plant). The next highest, elevated, risks were observed in the downwind profile stations. The most important parameters influencing spatial distribution of risks are <sup>226</sup>Ra activities in soil, wind direction, and distance from the plant. <sup>226</sup>Ra is generally the most important contributor to risks in soils, while <sup>40</sup>K is the least important. <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>232</sup>Th were found to be the most significant and comparable contributors to <em>D</em>, <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>, <em>H</em><sub>ex</sub>, and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub>. Only <sup>226</sup>Ra was found as the most significant contributor to <em>H</em><sub>in</sub> in the studied area. Elevated risks are partially from the natural source (carbonate bedrock) and partially from the power plant (coal combustion and handling, ash deposition on soil).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13864,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coal Geology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiological risks and excess lifetime cancer risk of the topsoil around the coal-fired Plomin thermal power plant (Istria, Croatia) and long-term effects after ceasing use of the coal with elevated radionuclides activities\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.coal.2024.104576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Radiological and health risks arising from <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K in topsoil due to coal combustion in Plomin thermal power plant were assessed: outdoor absorbed dose rate in air (<em>D</em>), annual outdoor effective dose rate (<em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>), external hazard index (<em>H</em><sub>ex</sub>), internal hazard index (<em>H</em><sub>in</sub>), and excess lifetime cancer risk outdoors (<em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub>). Spatial distribution of risks around the plant was studied and relative contributions of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K to <em>D</em> (applies to <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub> and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub> as well), <em>H</em><sub>ex</sub>, and <em>H</em><sub>in</sub> were determined. The risks were studied at two soil depths (A: 0–10 cm, B: 10–25 cm), radially around the plant at 1 km, 5 km, and 10 km distances from the plant, and in a downwind (SW) profile at 0.1–1 km distance from the plant. Elevated <em>D</em>, <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>, <em>H</em><sub>in</sub>, and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub> were determined, while <em>H</em><sub>ex</sub> was not elevated. Almost all <em>D</em>, <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>, and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub> values were above the world average for soils (58 nGy/h, 0.07 mSv/y, and 0.29 × 10<sup>−3</sup>, respectively). <em>D</em>, <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>, and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub> were: 32–338 nGy/h (mean value: 116 nGy/h), 0.039–0.414 mSv/y (mean value: 0.142 mSv/y), and 0.17 × 10<sup>−3</sup>–1.79 × 10<sup>−3</sup> (mean value: 0.61 × 10<sup>−3</sup>), respectively. <em>H</em><sub>ex</sub> was in the 0.18–1.98 range (mean value: 0.69), with only two extreme values above the recommended limit of 1. <em>H</em><sub>in</sub> was in the 0.22–3.67 range (mean value: 1.02), with most of the values above the recommended limit of 1 in the downwind profile and at one station with extremes (1 km from the plant). A “hot spot” was determined for all risks at 1 km distance from the plant in the wind direction (SW from the plant). The next highest, elevated, risks were observed in the downwind profile stations. The most important parameters influencing spatial distribution of risks are <sup>226</sup>Ra activities in soil, wind direction, and distance from the plant. <sup>226</sup>Ra is generally the most important contributor to risks in soils, while <sup>40</sup>K is the least important. <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>232</sup>Th were found to be the most significant and comparable contributors to <em>D</em>, <em>D</em><sub>ef</sub>, <em>H</em><sub>ex</sub>, and <em>ELCR</em><sub>out</sub>. Only <sup>226</sup>Ra was found as the most significant contributor to <em>H</em><sub>in</sub> in the studied area. Elevated risks are partially from the natural source (carbonate bedrock) and partially from the power plant (coal combustion and handling, ash deposition on soil).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Coal Geology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Coal Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516224001332\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coal Geology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516224001332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对普洛明热电厂燃煤造成的表土中 226Ra、232Th 和 40K 的辐射和健康风险进行了评估:室外空气吸收剂量率 (D)、年室外有效剂量率 (Def)、外部危害指数 (Hex)、内部危害指数 (Hin) 和室外超终生癌症风险 (ELCRout)。对工厂周围风险的空间分布进行了研究,并确定了 226Ra、232Th 和 40K 对 D(也适用于 Def 和 ELCRout)、Hex 和 Hin 的相对贡献。研究了两个土壤深度(A:0-10 厘米,B:10-25 厘米)、工厂周围 1 千米、5 千米和 10 千米的径向距离以及工厂 0.1-1 千米的顺风(SW)剖面的风险。确定 D、Def、Hin 和 ELCRout 升高,而 Hex 没有升高。几乎所有 D、Def 和 ELCRout 值都高于世界土壤平均值(分别为 58 nGy/h、0.07 mSv/y 和 0.29 × 10-3)。D、Def 和 ELCRout 分别为D、Def 和 ELCRout 分别为:32-338 nGy/h(平均值:116 nGy/h)、0.039-0.414 mSv/y(平均值:0.142 mSv/y)和 0.17 × 10-3-1.79 × 10-3(平均值:0.61 × 10-3)。Hex 值在 0.18-1.98 之间(平均值:0.69),只有两个极端值高于建议限值 1。Hin 值在 0.22-3.67 之间(平均值:1.02),下风向剖面的大多数值高于建议限值 1,有一个站点出现极端值(距离工厂 1 公里)。所有风险的 "热点 "均位于距离工厂 1 公里处的风向(工厂西南风)。在下风向剖面观测站观测到的次高风险点。影响风险空间分布的最重要参数是土壤中的 226Ra 活性、风向和与工厂的距离。226Ra 通常是造成土壤中风险的最重要因素,而 40K 的影响最小。研究发现,226Ra 和 232Th 对 D、Def、Hex 和 ELCRout 的影响最大,且具有可比性。在所研究的地区,只有 226Ra 对 Hin 的影响最大。升高的风险部分来自天然来源(碳酸盐基岩),部分来自发电厂(煤炭燃烧和处理、煤灰在土壤中的沉积)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiological risks and excess lifetime cancer risk of the topsoil around the coal-fired Plomin thermal power plant (Istria, Croatia) and long-term effects after ceasing use of the coal with elevated radionuclides activities

Radiological and health risks arising from 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in topsoil due to coal combustion in Plomin thermal power plant were assessed: outdoor absorbed dose rate in air (D), annual outdoor effective dose rate (Def), external hazard index (Hex), internal hazard index (Hin), and excess lifetime cancer risk outdoors (ELCRout). Spatial distribution of risks around the plant was studied and relative contributions of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K to D (applies to Def and ELCRout as well), Hex, and Hin were determined. The risks were studied at two soil depths (A: 0–10 cm, B: 10–25 cm), radially around the plant at 1 km, 5 km, and 10 km distances from the plant, and in a downwind (SW) profile at 0.1–1 km distance from the plant. Elevated D, Def, Hin, and ELCRout were determined, while Hex was not elevated. Almost all D, Def, and ELCRout values were above the world average for soils (58 nGy/h, 0.07 mSv/y, and 0.29 × 10−3, respectively). D, Def, and ELCRout were: 32–338 nGy/h (mean value: 116 nGy/h), 0.039–0.414 mSv/y (mean value: 0.142 mSv/y), and 0.17 × 10−3–1.79 × 10−3 (mean value: 0.61 × 10−3), respectively. Hex was in the 0.18–1.98 range (mean value: 0.69), with only two extreme values above the recommended limit of 1. Hin was in the 0.22–3.67 range (mean value: 1.02), with most of the values above the recommended limit of 1 in the downwind profile and at one station with extremes (1 km from the plant). A “hot spot” was determined for all risks at 1 km distance from the plant in the wind direction (SW from the plant). The next highest, elevated, risks were observed in the downwind profile stations. The most important parameters influencing spatial distribution of risks are 226Ra activities in soil, wind direction, and distance from the plant. 226Ra is generally the most important contributor to risks in soils, while 40K is the least important. 226Ra and 232Th were found to be the most significant and comparable contributors to D, Def, Hex, and ELCRout. Only 226Ra was found as the most significant contributor to Hin in the studied area. Elevated risks are partially from the natural source (carbonate bedrock) and partially from the power plant (coal combustion and handling, ash deposition on soil).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Coal Geology
International Journal of Coal Geology 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
145
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Coal Geology deals with fundamental and applied aspects of the geology and petrology of coal, oil/gas source rocks and shale gas resources. The journal aims to advance the exploration, exploitation and utilization of these resources, and to stimulate environmental awareness as well as advancement of engineering for effective resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信