Mervatt Abd Elfattah Yousof, Essam Abd ElHai Mokbel, Mohammed M. Dawoud, Rasha Lotfy Younes
{"title":"腰骶丛磁共振成像和磁共振神经显像在下肢根性神经病诊断中的应用","authors":"Mervatt Abd Elfattah Yousof, Essam Abd ElHai Mokbel, Mohammed M. Dawoud, Rasha Lotfy Younes","doi":"10.33545/26644436.2024.v7.i3a.391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies can assist in identifying the source of dysfunction. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify pelvic masses and visualize the major nerves of the plexus. The objective of this study was to assess the significance of MRI and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in diagnosing lumbosacral (LS) radiculopathy and to establish a correlation between the findings of these imaging techniques and the patient's medical history, physical examination, and nerve conduction study results. Methods: The present study was conducted on a sample of 30 individuals experiencing radicular pain in the lower extremities. Every patient underwent both MRI and MRN. Results: There were insignificant associations between MRI findings and clinical manifestations and electrophysiological studies. There were insignificant associations between MRN findings and clinical manifestations and electrophysiological studies. All the 6 cases with root abnormalities in MRN had a non-disc etiology. All the 6 cases with root abnormalities in MRN had a non-disc etiology. MRN showed no abnormalities in LS plexus in 24 cases. The remaining 6 cases showed root abnormalities. Nerve root compression and thickening was seen in all the six cases. Perineural edema was seen in 5 cases, and altered signal intensity was seen in 3 cases. Conclusion: MRN appears to detect LS nerve root abnormalities in a portion of patients with clinical symptoms of lower extremity radiculopathy and radiculopathy on EMG. Our finding may support the growing evidence on the utility of MRN as a useful adjunct to electrodiagnostic testing for the diagnosis of LS radiculopathy.","PeriodicalId":470702,"journal":{"name":"International journal of radiology and diagnostic imaging","volume":"68 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI and MR neurography of lumbosacral plexus in diagnosis of lower extremity radiculopathy\",\"authors\":\"Mervatt Abd Elfattah Yousof, Essam Abd ElHai Mokbel, Mohammed M. Dawoud, Rasha Lotfy Younes\",\"doi\":\"10.33545/26644436.2024.v7.i3a.391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies can assist in identifying the source of dysfunction. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify pelvic masses and visualize the major nerves of the plexus. The objective of this study was to assess the significance of MRI and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in diagnosing lumbosacral (LS) radiculopathy and to establish a correlation between the findings of these imaging techniques and the patient's medical history, physical examination, and nerve conduction study results. Methods: The present study was conducted on a sample of 30 individuals experiencing radicular pain in the lower extremities. Every patient underwent both MRI and MRN. Results: There were insignificant associations between MRI findings and clinical manifestations and electrophysiological studies. There were insignificant associations between MRN findings and clinical manifestations and electrophysiological studies. All the 6 cases with root abnormalities in MRN had a non-disc etiology. All the 6 cases with root abnormalities in MRN had a non-disc etiology. MRN showed no abnormalities in LS plexus in 24 cases. The remaining 6 cases showed root abnormalities. Nerve root compression and thickening was seen in all the six cases. Perineural edema was seen in 5 cases, and altered signal intensity was seen in 3 cases. Conclusion: MRN appears to detect LS nerve root abnormalities in a portion of patients with clinical symptoms of lower extremity radiculopathy and radiculopathy on EMG. Our finding may support the growing evidence on the utility of MRN as a useful adjunct to electrodiagnostic testing for the diagnosis of LS radiculopathy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":470702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of radiology and diagnostic imaging\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of radiology and diagnostic imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33545/26644436.2024.v7.i3a.391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of radiology and diagnostic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26644436.2024.v7.i3a.391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肌电图(EMG)和神经传导检查有助于确定功能障碍的来源。计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)可确定骨盆肿块并观察神经丛的主要神经。本研究的目的是评估核磁共振成像和磁共振神经成像(MRN)在诊断腰骶部(LS)神经根病方面的意义,并建立这些成像技术的结果与患者病史、体格检查和神经传导研究结果之间的相关性。研究方法本研究对 30 名下肢根性疼痛患者进行了抽样调查。每位患者都接受了 MRI 和 MRN 检查。结果核磁共振成像结果与临床表现和电生理学研究之间的关联不明显。核磁共振成像结果与临床表现和电生理检查之间的关联不明显。所有6例磁共振成像根部异常病例的病因均与椎间盘无关。所有6例MRN根部异常病例的病因均与盘无关。24 例 MRN 显示 LS 丛无异常。其余 6 例出现神经根异常。所有 6 例病例均出现神经根受压和增厚。5 例出现神经周围水肿,3 例出现信号强度改变。结论:MRN 似乎能检测出部分临床症状为下肢根性神经病和肌电图显示为根性神经病的患者的 LS 神经根异常。越来越多的证据表明,MRN 是诊断 LS 根性病变的电诊断测试的有效辅助手段。
MRI and MR neurography of lumbosacral plexus in diagnosis of lower extremity radiculopathy
Background: Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies can assist in identifying the source of dysfunction. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify pelvic masses and visualize the major nerves of the plexus. The objective of this study was to assess the significance of MRI and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in diagnosing lumbosacral (LS) radiculopathy and to establish a correlation between the findings of these imaging techniques and the patient's medical history, physical examination, and nerve conduction study results. Methods: The present study was conducted on a sample of 30 individuals experiencing radicular pain in the lower extremities. Every patient underwent both MRI and MRN. Results: There were insignificant associations between MRI findings and clinical manifestations and electrophysiological studies. There were insignificant associations between MRN findings and clinical manifestations and electrophysiological studies. All the 6 cases with root abnormalities in MRN had a non-disc etiology. All the 6 cases with root abnormalities in MRN had a non-disc etiology. MRN showed no abnormalities in LS plexus in 24 cases. The remaining 6 cases showed root abnormalities. Nerve root compression and thickening was seen in all the six cases. Perineural edema was seen in 5 cases, and altered signal intensity was seen in 3 cases. Conclusion: MRN appears to detect LS nerve root abnormalities in a portion of patients with clinical symptoms of lower extremity radiculopathy and radiculopathy on EMG. Our finding may support the growing evidence on the utility of MRN as a useful adjunct to electrodiagnostic testing for the diagnosis of LS radiculopathy.