苯巴比妥与左乙拉西坦对新生儿急性癫痫发作的疗效比较:随机对照试验

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Alireza Saadati, Narges Kalhor, Sara Afshari, Masoud Hassanvand Amouzadeh, Mansoreh Saffari, Mohsen Mollamohamadi
{"title":"苯巴比妥与左乙拉西坦对新生儿急性癫痫发作的疗效比较:随机对照试验","authors":"Alireza Saadati, Narges Kalhor, Sara Afshari, Masoud Hassanvand Amouzadeh, Mansoreh Saffari, Mohsen Mollamohamadi","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seizures in infancy are one of the main manifestations of disorders in the central nervous system that can have important etiologies. The development of anticonvulsant drugs and the importance of drug selection in infants, due to more complex underlying etiologies, compared with older ages, explicate the essentiality of executing clinical investigations to appraise the optimal therapeutic approach. The objective of the current investigation is to juxtapose two therapeutic approaches involving intravenous levetiracetam and intravenous phenobarbital in the management of neonatal seizures. This is a randomized controlled clinical trial study on 100 infants who were referred to the Hazrat Masoumeh (S) Hospital in Qom owing to convulsions. Infants with seizure who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were arbitrarily allocated to one of the two intervention cohorts: intravenous levetiracetam or intravenous phenobarbital, and therapeutic responses were compared. There was a substantial relationship between seizure time, seizure etiology, anticonvulsant therapy type, and treatment responsiveness. As a result, the risks of not responding to therapy and increasing the dose were approximately 6 and 5 times higher, respectively, in the group that experienced seizures in the fourth week than in the other groups. Infants with cerebrovascular anomalies were more prone to not responding to treatment. Furthermore, children administered phenobarbital had a 2.5-fold higher chance of not responding to treatment than those given levetiracetam (p = 0.043).","PeriodicalId":16729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Efficacy of Phenobarbital versus Levetiracetam in Acute Neonatal Seizures: A Randomized Control Trial\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Saadati, Narges Kalhor, Sara Afshari, Masoud Hassanvand Amouzadeh, Mansoreh Saffari, Mohsen Mollamohamadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1788054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seizures in infancy are one of the main manifestations of disorders in the central nervous system that can have important etiologies. The development of anticonvulsant drugs and the importance of drug selection in infants, due to more complex underlying etiologies, compared with older ages, explicate the essentiality of executing clinical investigations to appraise the optimal therapeutic approach. The objective of the current investigation is to juxtapose two therapeutic approaches involving intravenous levetiracetam and intravenous phenobarbital in the management of neonatal seizures. This is a randomized controlled clinical trial study on 100 infants who were referred to the Hazrat Masoumeh (S) Hospital in Qom owing to convulsions. Infants with seizure who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were arbitrarily allocated to one of the two intervention cohorts: intravenous levetiracetam or intravenous phenobarbital, and therapeutic responses were compared. There was a substantial relationship between seizure time, seizure etiology, anticonvulsant therapy type, and treatment responsiveness. As a result, the risks of not responding to therapy and increasing the dose were approximately 6 and 5 times higher, respectively, in the group that experienced seizures in the fourth week than in the other groups. Infants with cerebrovascular anomalies were more prone to not responding to treatment. Furthermore, children administered phenobarbital had a 2.5-fold higher chance of not responding to treatment than those given levetiracetam (p = 0.043).\",\"PeriodicalId\":16729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

婴儿期癫痫发作是中枢神经系统紊乱的主要表现之一,其病因可能十分复杂。随着抗惊厥药物的发展,以及与年龄较大的患者相比,由于潜在病因更为复杂,婴儿药物选择的重要性日益凸显,因此,开展临床研究以评估最佳治疗方法至关重要。本次研究的目的是将静脉注射左乙拉西坦和静脉注射苯巴比妥两种治疗方法并列用于新生儿癫痫发作的治疗。这是一项随机对照临床试验研究,研究对象是因抽搐而转诊到库姆 Hazrat Masoumeh (S) 医院的 100 名婴儿。符合纳入标准的癫痫发作婴儿被任意分配到两个干预组中的一个:静脉注射左乙拉西坦或静脉注射苯巴比妥,并对治疗反应进行比较。癫痫发作时间、癫痫发作病因、抗惊厥治疗类型和治疗反应之间存在密切关系。因此,在第四周出现癫痫发作的组别中,对治疗无反应和增加剂量的风险分别比其他组别高出约 6 倍和 5 倍。脑血管异常的婴儿更容易对治疗无反应。此外,与服用左乙拉西坦的婴儿相比,服用苯巴比妥的婴儿对治疗无反应的几率要高出2.5倍(p = 0.043)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Efficacy of Phenobarbital versus Levetiracetam in Acute Neonatal Seizures: A Randomized Control Trial
Seizures in infancy are one of the main manifestations of disorders in the central nervous system that can have important etiologies. The development of anticonvulsant drugs and the importance of drug selection in infants, due to more complex underlying etiologies, compared with older ages, explicate the essentiality of executing clinical investigations to appraise the optimal therapeutic approach. The objective of the current investigation is to juxtapose two therapeutic approaches involving intravenous levetiracetam and intravenous phenobarbital in the management of neonatal seizures. This is a randomized controlled clinical trial study on 100 infants who were referred to the Hazrat Masoumeh (S) Hospital in Qom owing to convulsions. Infants with seizure who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were arbitrarily allocated to one of the two intervention cohorts: intravenous levetiracetam or intravenous phenobarbital, and therapeutic responses were compared. There was a substantial relationship between seizure time, seizure etiology, anticonvulsant therapy type, and treatment responsiveness. As a result, the risks of not responding to therapy and increasing the dose were approximately 6 and 5 times higher, respectively, in the group that experienced seizures in the fourth week than in the other groups. Infants with cerebrovascular anomalies were more prone to not responding to treatment. Furthermore, children administered phenobarbital had a 2.5-fold higher chance of not responding to treatment than those given levetiracetam (p = 0.043).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Neurology is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed medical journal publishing articles in the fields of childhood neurology, pediatric neurosurgery, pediatric neuroradiology, child psychiatry and pediatric neuroscience. The Journal of Pediatric Neurology, the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Science of the Yüzüncü Yil University in Turkiye, encourages submissions from authors throughout the world. The following articles will be considered for publication: editorials, original and review articles, rapid communications, case reports, neuroimage of the month, letters to the editor and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信