防止债务人撤回仍受分期付款保护关系约束的抵押物的法律保护 债权人 债务人

Aidil Munsaf, Suzanalisa Suzanalisa, Fatriansyah Fatriansyah
{"title":"防止债务人撤回仍受分期付款保护关系约束的抵押物的法律保护 债权人 债务人","authors":"Aidil Munsaf, Suzanalisa Suzanalisa, Fatriansyah Fatriansyah","doi":"10.33087/legalitas.v16i1.586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finance companies in providing financing credit to their consumers use a Fiduciary guarantee system. Legal protection for debtors upon withdrawal of fiduciary collateral objects following the constitutional court decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 has been regulated in a preventive and repressive manner. Preventively, legal protection for debtors upon withdrawal of fiduciary collateral objects has been regulated in the provisions of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law which was then confirmed in the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 130/PMK.010/2012. Apart from that, preventive protection is also emphasized in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 in conjunction with the Constitutional Court Decision 18/PUU-XVII/2019. If the debtor objects to having his vehicle taken, the leasing party or debt collector may not take the vehicle by force. This vehicle may be taken if there has been a court decision with permanent legal force. What the public needs to know is that the way to enforce unlawful acts committed by consumers who are in arrears on motor vehicle loans is by applying for execution in court, not by being taken by force. as for how to deal with Finance business actors and Debt Collectors who carry out their work.","PeriodicalId":387350,"journal":{"name":"Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum","volume":"155 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitor Terhadap Penarikan Objek Jaminan Yang Masih Terikat Dalam Hubungan Perlindungan Angsuran Kreditur Debitur\",\"authors\":\"Aidil Munsaf, Suzanalisa Suzanalisa, Fatriansyah Fatriansyah\",\"doi\":\"10.33087/legalitas.v16i1.586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finance companies in providing financing credit to their consumers use a Fiduciary guarantee system. Legal protection for debtors upon withdrawal of fiduciary collateral objects following the constitutional court decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 has been regulated in a preventive and repressive manner. Preventively, legal protection for debtors upon withdrawal of fiduciary collateral objects has been regulated in the provisions of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law which was then confirmed in the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 130/PMK.010/2012. Apart from that, preventive protection is also emphasized in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 in conjunction with the Constitutional Court Decision 18/PUU-XVII/2019. If the debtor objects to having his vehicle taken, the leasing party or debt collector may not take the vehicle by force. This vehicle may be taken if there has been a court decision with permanent legal force. What the public needs to know is that the way to enforce unlawful acts committed by consumers who are in arrears on motor vehicle loans is by applying for execution in court, not by being taken by force. as for how to deal with Finance business actors and Debt Collectors who carry out their work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v16i1.586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v16i1.586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金融公司在向其消费者提供融资信贷时使用信托担保制度。根据宪法法院第 2/PUU-XIX/2021 号裁决,在撤销信托抵押品时对债务人的法律保护以预防和压制的方式进行了规定。预防性方面,《信托担保法》的条款规定了在撤销信托抵押品时对债务人的法律保护,印度尼西亚共和国财政部长第130/PMK.010/2012号条例随后确认了该规定。此外,宪法法院第 2/PUU-XIX/2021 号决定和宪法法院第 18/PUU-XVII/2019 号决定也强调了预防性保护。如果债务人反对收回其车辆,租赁方或收债方不得强行收回车辆。如果法院判决具有永久法律效力,则可以扣押车辆。公众需要知道的是,对拖欠机动车贷款的消费者所实施的不法行为的强制执行方式是向法院申请执行,而不是被强行扣押。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitor Terhadap Penarikan Objek Jaminan Yang Masih Terikat Dalam Hubungan Perlindungan Angsuran Kreditur Debitur
Finance companies in providing financing credit to their consumers use a Fiduciary guarantee system. Legal protection for debtors upon withdrawal of fiduciary collateral objects following the constitutional court decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 has been regulated in a preventive and repressive manner. Preventively, legal protection for debtors upon withdrawal of fiduciary collateral objects has been regulated in the provisions of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law which was then confirmed in the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 130/PMK.010/2012. Apart from that, preventive protection is also emphasized in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 in conjunction with the Constitutional Court Decision 18/PUU-XVII/2019. If the debtor objects to having his vehicle taken, the leasing party or debt collector may not take the vehicle by force. This vehicle may be taken if there has been a court decision with permanent legal force. What the public needs to know is that the way to enforce unlawful acts committed by consumers who are in arrears on motor vehicle loans is by applying for execution in court, not by being taken by force. as for how to deal with Finance business actors and Debt Collectors who carry out their work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信