{"title":"吉尔吉斯语和阿拉伯语中 \"名词+名词 \"模式中的 \"躯体 \"和 \"动物 \"句式","authors":"A. Otorchieva, E. Buudaybekova, N. Konokbaev","doi":"10.33619/2414-2948/104/68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By clarifying the structural features of phraseological units, we are trying to determine the typological similarities and sharp differences between nominal phraseological units in these languages. You can recognize the grammatical features of the words in each cross by determining the relative aspects of phraseological units. The lexico-grammatical meaning of the main words in phraseological units and the meanings attached to phraseological units are not always compatible. Therefore, in order to determine which group of words phraseological units belong to, it is necessary to compare the meanings of phraseological units and conduct a comprehensive, rather than one-sided, analysis. And phraseological units perform the function of individual words in the Kyrgyz and Arabic languages. The common property of phraseological units in two languages is associated not with the individual meaning of the words included in their composition, but with the meaning given to one word, that is, when it is used instead of one word, no matter how many components it consists of. Phraseologisms in the Kyrgyz and Arabic languages are subject to a specific verbal family, are used in a transitional form in meaning and convey the meaning of one word, which performs the function of one of its members in a sentence.","PeriodicalId":505704,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science and Practice","volume":" 63","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Somatic and Animalistic Phraseologies in the Model Noun + Noun in the Kyrgyz and Arabic Languages\",\"authors\":\"A. Otorchieva, E. Buudaybekova, N. Konokbaev\",\"doi\":\"10.33619/2414-2948/104/68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By clarifying the structural features of phraseological units, we are trying to determine the typological similarities and sharp differences between nominal phraseological units in these languages. You can recognize the grammatical features of the words in each cross by determining the relative aspects of phraseological units. The lexico-grammatical meaning of the main words in phraseological units and the meanings attached to phraseological units are not always compatible. Therefore, in order to determine which group of words phraseological units belong to, it is necessary to compare the meanings of phraseological units and conduct a comprehensive, rather than one-sided, analysis. And phraseological units perform the function of individual words in the Kyrgyz and Arabic languages. The common property of phraseological units in two languages is associated not with the individual meaning of the words included in their composition, but with the meaning given to one word, that is, when it is used instead of one word, no matter how many components it consists of. Phraseologisms in the Kyrgyz and Arabic languages are subject to a specific verbal family, are used in a transitional form in meaning and convey the meaning of one word, which performs the function of one of its members in a sentence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\" 63\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/104/68\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/104/68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Somatic and Animalistic Phraseologies in the Model Noun + Noun in the Kyrgyz and Arabic Languages
By clarifying the structural features of phraseological units, we are trying to determine the typological similarities and sharp differences between nominal phraseological units in these languages. You can recognize the grammatical features of the words in each cross by determining the relative aspects of phraseological units. The lexico-grammatical meaning of the main words in phraseological units and the meanings attached to phraseological units are not always compatible. Therefore, in order to determine which group of words phraseological units belong to, it is necessary to compare the meanings of phraseological units and conduct a comprehensive, rather than one-sided, analysis. And phraseological units perform the function of individual words in the Kyrgyz and Arabic languages. The common property of phraseological units in two languages is associated not with the individual meaning of the words included in their composition, but with the meaning given to one word, that is, when it is used instead of one word, no matter how many components it consists of. Phraseologisms in the Kyrgyz and Arabic languages are subject to a specific verbal family, are used in a transitional form in meaning and convey the meaning of one word, which performs the function of one of its members in a sentence.