{"title":"股骨近端假体周围骨折的死亡率:手术时间的影响","authors":"Jacopo Vittori, Norsaga Hoxha, F. Dettoni, Carolina Rivoira, Roberto Rossi, Umberto Cottino","doi":"10.3390/prosthesis6040058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hip replacement surgery is increasingly being performed on older patients, raising the risk of periprosthetic proximal femur fractures (PPFFs). While the impact of surgery timing on mortality in proximal femoral fractures is established, its effect on PPFFs remains unclear. This study aims to examine the correlation between surgery timing and mortality in PPFF patients. In a historical cohort study, we analyzed data from 79 PPFF patients treated from 2012 to 2022. Patients were categorized by surgery timing (≤48 h, 32 patients vs. >48 h, 47 patients). Outcomes and mortality rates were compared. No significant difference in mortality was observed between patients undergoing early (<48 h) and delayed (>48 h) surgery at 30 days and 1 year. Factors such as age (p = 0.154), gender (p = 0.058), ASA score (p = 0.893), Vancouver classification (p = 0.577), and surgery type (implant revision p = 0.691, OR = 0.667) did not affect 30-day mortality. However, 1-year mortality was influenced by gender (male p = 0.045) and age (p = 0.004), but not by other variables (Vancouver classification p = 0.443, implant revision p = 0.196). These findings indicate no association between surgery timing and mortality in PPFF patients, suggesting that other factors may influence outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize PPFF management.","PeriodicalId":506748,"journal":{"name":"Prosthesis","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality Rate in Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures: Impact of Time to Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Jacopo Vittori, Norsaga Hoxha, F. Dettoni, Carolina Rivoira, Roberto Rossi, Umberto Cottino\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/prosthesis6040058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hip replacement surgery is increasingly being performed on older patients, raising the risk of periprosthetic proximal femur fractures (PPFFs). While the impact of surgery timing on mortality in proximal femoral fractures is established, its effect on PPFFs remains unclear. This study aims to examine the correlation between surgery timing and mortality in PPFF patients. In a historical cohort study, we analyzed data from 79 PPFF patients treated from 2012 to 2022. Patients were categorized by surgery timing (≤48 h, 32 patients vs. >48 h, 47 patients). Outcomes and mortality rates were compared. No significant difference in mortality was observed between patients undergoing early (<48 h) and delayed (>48 h) surgery at 30 days and 1 year. Factors such as age (p = 0.154), gender (p = 0.058), ASA score (p = 0.893), Vancouver classification (p = 0.577), and surgery type (implant revision p = 0.691, OR = 0.667) did not affect 30-day mortality. However, 1-year mortality was influenced by gender (male p = 0.045) and age (p = 0.004), but not by other variables (Vancouver classification p = 0.443, implant revision p = 0.196). These findings indicate no association between surgery timing and mortality in PPFF patients, suggesting that other factors may influence outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize PPFF management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthesis\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
越来越多的老年患者接受髋关节置换手术,从而增加了股骨近端假体周围骨折(PPFF)的风险。虽然手术时机对股骨近端骨折死亡率的影响已经确定,但其对 PPFF 的影响仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨手术时机与 PPFF 患者死亡率之间的相关性。在一项历史队列研究中,我们分析了从2012年到2022年接受治疗的79名PPFF患者的数据。患者按手术时间分类(≤48小时,32例;>48小时,47例)。对结果和死亡率进行了比较。早期(48小时)手术患者在30天和1年后的死亡率无明显差异。年龄(p = 0.154)、性别(p = 0.058)、ASA 评分(p = 0.893)、温哥华分级(p = 0.577)和手术类型(植入物翻修 p = 0.691,OR = 0.667)等因素对 30 天死亡率没有影响。然而,1 年死亡率受性别(男性 p = 0.045)和年龄(p = 0.004)的影响,但不受其他变量(温哥华分类 p = 0.443,植入物翻修 p = 0.196)的影响。这些研究结果表明,PPFF 患者的手术时机与死亡率之间没有关联,这表明其他因素可能会影响手术效果。要优化 PPFF 的管理,还需要进一步的研究。
Mortality Rate in Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures: Impact of Time to Surgery
Hip replacement surgery is increasingly being performed on older patients, raising the risk of periprosthetic proximal femur fractures (PPFFs). While the impact of surgery timing on mortality in proximal femoral fractures is established, its effect on PPFFs remains unclear. This study aims to examine the correlation between surgery timing and mortality in PPFF patients. In a historical cohort study, we analyzed data from 79 PPFF patients treated from 2012 to 2022. Patients were categorized by surgery timing (≤48 h, 32 patients vs. >48 h, 47 patients). Outcomes and mortality rates were compared. No significant difference in mortality was observed between patients undergoing early (<48 h) and delayed (>48 h) surgery at 30 days and 1 year. Factors such as age (p = 0.154), gender (p = 0.058), ASA score (p = 0.893), Vancouver classification (p = 0.577), and surgery type (implant revision p = 0.691, OR = 0.667) did not affect 30-day mortality. However, 1-year mortality was influenced by gender (male p = 0.045) and age (p = 0.004), but not by other variables (Vancouver classification p = 0.443, implant revision p = 0.196). These findings indicate no association between surgery timing and mortality in PPFF patients, suggesting that other factors may influence outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize PPFF management.