{"title":"评估直肠癌腹腔镜手术与开腹手术后肠梗阻的风险:系统回顾","authors":"Rajarshi Mitra","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This systematic review aimed to evaluate the incidence of adhesion-related readmissions and surgery for adhesive bowel obstruction (BO) in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal cancer. Laparoscopic surgery is generally believed to be associated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesion formation compared to open surgery.\n \n \n \n A thorough and systematic search was conducted across multiple comprehensive databases to identify relevant studies for inclusion in this systematic review. The purpose of this search was to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased selection of studies to provide a robust foundation for the subsequent analysis.\n \n \n \n In this review, a total of 10 studies were involved on bowel obstruction risk in laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. This study consistently showed that laparoscopic surgery carried a lower risk of postoperative bowel obstruction compared to open surgery. Six studies in the review supported this finding.\n \n \n \n Laparoscopic surgery shows a significant reduction in adhesive bowel obstruction compared to open surgery, as indicated by this systematic review. However, more well-designed randomized trials involving diverse patients are needed to confirm these benefits. Further research is necessary to gain a clearer understanding of the advantages of laparoscopic surgery in reducing the risk of bowel obstruction.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the risk of bowel obstruction after laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Rajarshi Mitra\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n This systematic review aimed to evaluate the incidence of adhesion-related readmissions and surgery for adhesive bowel obstruction (BO) in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal cancer. Laparoscopic surgery is generally believed to be associated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesion formation compared to open surgery.\\n \\n \\n \\n A thorough and systematic search was conducted across multiple comprehensive databases to identify relevant studies for inclusion in this systematic review. The purpose of this search was to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased selection of studies to provide a robust foundation for the subsequent analysis.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this review, a total of 10 studies were involved on bowel obstruction risk in laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. This study consistently showed that laparoscopic surgery carried a lower risk of postoperative bowel obstruction compared to open surgery. Six studies in the review supported this finding.\\n \\n \\n \\n Laparoscopic surgery shows a significant reduction in adhesive bowel obstruction compared to open surgery, as indicated by this systematic review. However, more well-designed randomized trials involving diverse patients are needed to confirm these benefits. Further research is necessary to gain a clearer understanding of the advantages of laparoscopic surgery in reducing the risk of bowel obstruction.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of the risk of bowel obstruction after laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the incidence of adhesion-related readmissions and surgery for adhesive bowel obstruction (BO) in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for rectal cancer. Laparoscopic surgery is generally believed to be associated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesion formation compared to open surgery.
A thorough and systematic search was conducted across multiple comprehensive databases to identify relevant studies for inclusion in this systematic review. The purpose of this search was to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased selection of studies to provide a robust foundation for the subsequent analysis.
In this review, a total of 10 studies were involved on bowel obstruction risk in laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. This study consistently showed that laparoscopic surgery carried a lower risk of postoperative bowel obstruction compared to open surgery. Six studies in the review supported this finding.
Laparoscopic surgery shows a significant reduction in adhesive bowel obstruction compared to open surgery, as indicated by this systematic review. However, more well-designed randomized trials involving diverse patients are needed to confirm these benefits. Further research is necessary to gain a clearer understanding of the advantages of laparoscopic surgery in reducing the risk of bowel obstruction.