模糊交通问题拟议排序方法与现有方法的比较

Q4 Mathematics
E. Fany, D. Stephen Dinagar, T.B.M.L. College
{"title":"模糊交通问题拟议排序方法与现有方法的比较","authors":"E. Fany, D. Stephen Dinagar, T.B.M.L. College","doi":"10.52783/cana.v31.1038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we proposed two ranking methods to solve the transportation problems. Here we introduced new methods for problem solving. In this article, we proposed two ranking functions called ῡ_μ (Value Ranking) and Ᾱ_μ(Ambiguity Ranking) to solve the transportation problems. This work's main aim is to compare the suggested ranking function with the existing ranking method (Roubast Ranking). We have compared it with an example and justified it.","PeriodicalId":40036,"journal":{"name":"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis","volume":" 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Proposed Ranking Method for Fuzzy Transportation Problem with the Existing Method\",\"authors\":\"E. Fany, D. Stephen Dinagar, T.B.M.L. College\",\"doi\":\"10.52783/cana.v31.1038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we proposed two ranking methods to solve the transportation problems. Here we introduced new methods for problem solving. In this article, we proposed two ranking functions called ῡ_μ (Value Ranking) and Ᾱ_μ(Ambiguity Ranking) to solve the transportation problems. This work's main aim is to compare the suggested ranking function with the existing ranking method (Roubast Ranking). We have compared it with an example and justified it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis\",\"volume\":\" 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v31.1038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v31.1038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了两种解决交通问题的排序方法。在这里,我们介绍了解决问题的新方法。在本文中,我们提出了两个排序函数ῡ_μ(价值排序)和Ᾱ_μ(模糊排序)来解决交通问题。这项工作的主要目的是将建议的排序函数与现有的排序方法(Roubast Ranking)进行比较。我们通过一个实例对其进行了比较,并证明了其合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Proposed Ranking Method for Fuzzy Transportation Problem with the Existing Method
In this paper, we proposed two ranking methods to solve the transportation problems. Here we introduced new methods for problem solving. In this article, we proposed two ranking functions called ῡ_μ (Value Ranking) and Ᾱ_μ(Ambiguity Ranking) to solve the transportation problems. This work's main aim is to compare the suggested ranking function with the existing ranking method (Roubast Ranking). We have compared it with an example and justified it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信