J. J. Patel, N. Shah, K. Janani, S. Mahalaxmi, Priya Porwal, Aishwarya D. Jain
{"title":"用于隔离手术的各种橡胶坝屏障材料的密封效果:随机对照试验","authors":"J. J. Patel, N. Shah, K. Janani, S. Mahalaxmi, Priya Porwal, Aishwarya D. Jain","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_93_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aim of the study was to assess the sealing efficacy of three dam seal materials.\n \n \n \n Ninety participants were enrolled after obtaining consent. After the placement of rubber dam (RD), a stream of air was applied at the interface area and visualized at ×6 magnification to identify sealing ability. Dam seal materials were divided into Group A: Liquid Dam, Group B: Kool-Dam, and Group C: OraSeal caulking putty substance. Leakage was assessed using self-designed criteria such as sealing ability, retention, ease of adaptability, and removal. The data were tabulated and analyzed using IBM SPSS 20 software.\n \n \n \n Kool-Dam (Group B) demonstrated superior effectiveness in controlling saliva seepage around the clamp and teeth (P = 0.039) compared to other groups. In addition, it was evident that Kool-Dam (Group B) had greater effectiveness as compared to Liquid Dam and OraSeal (Group C) with relation to the retention of dam seal material (P = 0.039). There was no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in the ease of adaptation or removal of dam seal material.\n \n \n \n This study highlights the importance of dam seal materials as an adjunct material to establish a tight seal over a RD placement. From the present study, it was evident that Kool-Dam exhibited superior performance over Liquid Dam and OraSeal dam seal material in terms of better sealing ability and retention of the dam seal materials.\n","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sealing efficacy of various rubber dam barrier materials used for isolation procedures: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"J. J. Patel, N. Shah, K. Janani, S. Mahalaxmi, Priya Porwal, Aishwarya D. Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/endo.endo_93_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The aim of the study was to assess the sealing efficacy of three dam seal materials.\\n \\n \\n \\n Ninety participants were enrolled after obtaining consent. After the placement of rubber dam (RD), a stream of air was applied at the interface area and visualized at ×6 magnification to identify sealing ability. Dam seal materials were divided into Group A: Liquid Dam, Group B: Kool-Dam, and Group C: OraSeal caulking putty substance. Leakage was assessed using self-designed criteria such as sealing ability, retention, ease of adaptability, and removal. The data were tabulated and analyzed using IBM SPSS 20 software.\\n \\n \\n \\n Kool-Dam (Group B) demonstrated superior effectiveness in controlling saliva seepage around the clamp and teeth (P = 0.039) compared to other groups. In addition, it was evident that Kool-Dam (Group B) had greater effectiveness as compared to Liquid Dam and OraSeal (Group C) with relation to the retention of dam seal material (P = 0.039). There was no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in the ease of adaptation or removal of dam seal material.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study highlights the importance of dam seal materials as an adjunct material to establish a tight seal over a RD placement. From the present study, it was evident that Kool-Dam exhibited superior performance over Liquid Dam and OraSeal dam seal material in terms of better sealing ability and retention of the dam seal materials.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endodontology\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_93_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_93_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究旨在评估三种水坝密封材料的密封效果。 在征得同意后,90 名参与者参加了研究。放置橡胶坝(RD)后,在界面区域注入气流,并在 ×6 倍放大镜下观察,以确定密封能力。水坝密封材料分为 A 组液体坝、B 组:Kool-Dam 和 C 组:OraSeal 填缝腻子物质。渗漏情况采用自行设计的标准进行评估,如密封能力、保持力、适应性和清除的难易程度。数据使用 IBM SPSS 20 软件进行制表和分析。 与其他组相比,Kool-Dam(B 组)在控制夹钳和牙齿周围的唾液渗出方面表现出更高的有效性(P = 0.039)。此外,Kool-Dam(B 组)与 Liquid Dam 和 OraSeal(C 组)相比,在保持水坝密封材料方面显然更有效(P = 0.039)。在适应或去除水坝密封材料的难易程度方面,两者没有明显的统计学差异(P < 0.05)。 这项研究强调了坝体密封材料作为一种辅助材料,对在 RD 置位上建立严密密封的重要性。从本研究中可以明显看出,Kool-Dam 在密封能力和坝封材料的保留方面优于 Liquid Dam 和 OraSeal 坝封材料。
Sealing efficacy of various rubber dam barrier materials used for isolation procedures: A randomized controlled trial
The aim of the study was to assess the sealing efficacy of three dam seal materials.
Ninety participants were enrolled after obtaining consent. After the placement of rubber dam (RD), a stream of air was applied at the interface area and visualized at ×6 magnification to identify sealing ability. Dam seal materials were divided into Group A: Liquid Dam, Group B: Kool-Dam, and Group C: OraSeal caulking putty substance. Leakage was assessed using self-designed criteria such as sealing ability, retention, ease of adaptability, and removal. The data were tabulated and analyzed using IBM SPSS 20 software.
Kool-Dam (Group B) demonstrated superior effectiveness in controlling saliva seepage around the clamp and teeth (P = 0.039) compared to other groups. In addition, it was evident that Kool-Dam (Group B) had greater effectiveness as compared to Liquid Dam and OraSeal (Group C) with relation to the retention of dam seal material (P = 0.039). There was no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in the ease of adaptation or removal of dam seal material.
This study highlights the importance of dam seal materials as an adjunct material to establish a tight seal over a RD placement. From the present study, it was evident that Kool-Dam exhibited superior performance over Liquid Dam and OraSeal dam seal material in terms of better sealing ability and retention of the dam seal materials.