澳大利亚物理治疗专业研究生对研究的态度:一项调查

Peter Stubbs, Christopher Altre, Arianne P Verhagen, N. Bartley, Alana B McCambridge, Jereme Borja, Lauren Haylock, Kayla Dang, J. W. Pate
{"title":"澳大利亚物理治疗专业研究生对研究的态度:一项调查","authors":"Peter Stubbs, Christopher Altre, Arianne P Verhagen, N. Bartley, Alana B McCambridge, Jereme Borja, Lauren Haylock, Kayla Dang, J. W. Pate","doi":"10.33966/hepj.7.1.18040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the attitudes towards research in a two-year, graduate-entry Master of Physiotherapy course.\nMethodology: All students starting (T0) and ending (T1) their degrees in 2020 and 2021 were invited to complete the revised Attitudes Towards Research Questionnaire. This is a three-factor instrument with 13 statements assessing Research Usefulness (four statements, scores ranging from 4 to 28), Research Anxiety (five statements, scores ranging from 5 to 35), and Positive Research Predispositions (four statements, scores ranging from 4 to 28). Each statement was scored using a seven-item Likert scale ranging from ‘Strongly Agree’ (1) to ‘Strongly Disagree’ (7). Student responses between T1 and T0 for factor scores were compared using independent samples t-tests and summarised using mean differences (95% CIs). We defined the minimally important difference as 15% of the scale range.\nFindings: Ninety-seven percent (n=124/129) of students completed the survey at T0 and 57% (n=79/125) at T1.\nWe found no difference between T0 and T1 in research anxiety (0.2 points, 95% CI: –1.5 to 2.0) and research usefulness (–0.9 points, 95% CI: –1.8 to 0.1), but a significant (although not meaningful) decrease in positive research predispositions between T0 and T1 (–1.7 points, 95% CI –3.2 to –0.2).\nResearch implications: Qualitative research could complement these quantitative findings and provide in-depth reasons for student scores.\nPractical implications: Educators need more active strategies to improve attitudes and engagement in research-focused subjects to further engage students.\nOriginality/value: This is the first study to document attitudes towards research in an Australian graduate-entry Master of Physiotherapy program.\nLimitations: There is likely bias (unclear in which direction) at T1 given that 57% of students completed the survey. Surveys were not linked, so group differences were assessed independently.\n Keywords: Evidence-based practice; research methods; Master of Physiotherapy, UTS Physiotherapy Student surveys (PHYSS) study","PeriodicalId":119792,"journal":{"name":"Health Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes towards research in graduate-entry Australian physiotherapy students: a survey\",\"authors\":\"Peter Stubbs, Christopher Altre, Arianne P Verhagen, N. Bartley, Alana B McCambridge, Jereme Borja, Lauren Haylock, Kayla Dang, J. W. Pate\",\"doi\":\"10.33966/hepj.7.1.18040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the attitudes towards research in a two-year, graduate-entry Master of Physiotherapy course.\\nMethodology: All students starting (T0) and ending (T1) their degrees in 2020 and 2021 were invited to complete the revised Attitudes Towards Research Questionnaire. This is a three-factor instrument with 13 statements assessing Research Usefulness (four statements, scores ranging from 4 to 28), Research Anxiety (five statements, scores ranging from 5 to 35), and Positive Research Predispositions (four statements, scores ranging from 4 to 28). Each statement was scored using a seven-item Likert scale ranging from ‘Strongly Agree’ (1) to ‘Strongly Disagree’ (7). Student responses between T1 and T0 for factor scores were compared using independent samples t-tests and summarised using mean differences (95% CIs). We defined the minimally important difference as 15% of the scale range.\\nFindings: Ninety-seven percent (n=124/129) of students completed the survey at T0 and 57% (n=79/125) at T1.\\nWe found no difference between T0 and T1 in research anxiety (0.2 points, 95% CI: –1.5 to 2.0) and research usefulness (–0.9 points, 95% CI: –1.8 to 0.1), but a significant (although not meaningful) decrease in positive research predispositions between T0 and T1 (–1.7 points, 95% CI –3.2 to –0.2).\\nResearch implications: Qualitative research could complement these quantitative findings and provide in-depth reasons for student scores.\\nPractical implications: Educators need more active strategies to improve attitudes and engagement in research-focused subjects to further engage students.\\nOriginality/value: This is the first study to document attitudes towards research in an Australian graduate-entry Master of Physiotherapy program.\\nLimitations: There is likely bias (unclear in which direction) at T1 given that 57% of students completed the survey. Surveys were not linked, so group differences were assessed independently.\\n Keywords: Evidence-based practice; research methods; Master of Physiotherapy, UTS Physiotherapy Student surveys (PHYSS) study\",\"PeriodicalId\":119792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33966/hepj.7.1.18040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33966/hepj.7.1.18040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估两年制物理治疗学硕士研究生入学课程的研究态度:邀请所有在 2020 年和 2021 年开始(T0)和结束(T1)学位的学生填写经修订的 "研究态度问卷"。这是一份三因素问卷,包含 13 个语句,分别评估研究有用性(4 个语句,分值从 4 到 28 不等)、研究焦虑(5 个语句,分值从 5 到 35 不等)和积极研究倾向(4 个语句,分值从 4 到 28 不等)。每项陈述均采用七项李克特量表评分,从 "非常同意"(1)到 "非常不同意"(7)不等。使用独立样本 t 检验比较了 T1 和 T0 之间学生对因子得分的反应,并使用平均差异(95% CI)进行了总结。我们将最小重要差异定义为量表范围的 15%:我们发现在 T0 和 T1 之间,研究焦虑(0.2 分,95% CI:-1.5 至 2.0)和研究有用性(-0.9 分,95% CI:-1.8 至 0.1)没有差异,但在 T0 和 T1 之间,积极的研究倾向显著下降(虽然没有意义)(-1.7 分,95% CI -3.2 至 -0.2):定性研究可以补充这些定量研究结果,并提供学生得分的深层原因:教育工作者需要采取更积极的策略来改善学生对研究性学科的态度和参与度,以进一步吸引学生:原创性/价值: 这是第一项记录澳大利亚物理治疗硕士研究生入学课程中对研究的态度的研究:鉴于57%的学生完成了调查,因此在T1阶段可能存在偏差(方向不明)。调查没有联系起来,因此小组差异是独立评估的。关键词循证实践;研究方法;物理治疗硕士,UTS物理治疗学生调查(PHYSS)研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes towards research in graduate-entry Australian physiotherapy students: a survey
Purpose: To assess the attitudes towards research in a two-year, graduate-entry Master of Physiotherapy course. Methodology: All students starting (T0) and ending (T1) their degrees in 2020 and 2021 were invited to complete the revised Attitudes Towards Research Questionnaire. This is a three-factor instrument with 13 statements assessing Research Usefulness (four statements, scores ranging from 4 to 28), Research Anxiety (five statements, scores ranging from 5 to 35), and Positive Research Predispositions (four statements, scores ranging from 4 to 28). Each statement was scored using a seven-item Likert scale ranging from ‘Strongly Agree’ (1) to ‘Strongly Disagree’ (7). Student responses between T1 and T0 for factor scores were compared using independent samples t-tests and summarised using mean differences (95% CIs). We defined the minimally important difference as 15% of the scale range. Findings: Ninety-seven percent (n=124/129) of students completed the survey at T0 and 57% (n=79/125) at T1. We found no difference between T0 and T1 in research anxiety (0.2 points, 95% CI: –1.5 to 2.0) and research usefulness (–0.9 points, 95% CI: –1.8 to 0.1), but a significant (although not meaningful) decrease in positive research predispositions between T0 and T1 (–1.7 points, 95% CI –3.2 to –0.2). Research implications: Qualitative research could complement these quantitative findings and provide in-depth reasons for student scores. Practical implications: Educators need more active strategies to improve attitudes and engagement in research-focused subjects to further engage students. Originality/value: This is the first study to document attitudes towards research in an Australian graduate-entry Master of Physiotherapy program. Limitations: There is likely bias (unclear in which direction) at T1 given that 57% of students completed the survey. Surveys were not linked, so group differences were assessed independently.  Keywords: Evidence-based practice; research methods; Master of Physiotherapy, UTS Physiotherapy Student surveys (PHYSS) study
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信