Habib Saad, Umar Ibrahim, Samson D. Yusuf, A. Alhaji, Bappah S. Yahaya, M.M. Sidi
{"title":"尼日利亚东北部儿科患者的剂量优化和辐射安全","authors":"Habib Saad, Umar Ibrahim, Samson D. Yusuf, A. Alhaji, Bappah S. Yahaya, M.M. Sidi","doi":"10.4314/dujopas.v10i2b.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ionizing radiation from medical sources, primarily diagnostic X-rays, constitutes the largest artificial contribution. Variances in patient doses across radiological departments for similar examinations prompted surveys on patient doses in diagnostic radiology globally. The study Assess the Entrance Skin Dose for paediatric patients during specific radiological exams (Chest AP/PA, Skull AP, and Pelvic AP) and then compare the findings to the diagnostic reference levels established by international organizations. Three x-ray machines from three different tertiary health institutions with facilities for paediatric radiography were used under clinical conditions for the selected radiological examinations. A total of 135 TL dosimeter chips positioned selectively on patients at the axis of the primary X-ray beam to capture entrance skin dose/dose equivalent Hp (0.07). The TLD chips underwent analysis by heating using Harshaw 4500 automatic TLD reader and ESD for each patient was calculated using a given equation. Result indicated that the total average maximum and minimum mean and standard error (SE) value of age group of the participants are 0.60±0.3 – 13.50±0.7, tube loading kVp as 54.90±0.0 – 73.70±1.3 and tube current mAs 4.5±0.2 – 12.5±1.0 respectively. The mean values of ESDs found at each hospital are much higher than, the same published studies and the internationally recommended values and dose reference levels by National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB), International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), and European Commission (EU). This is presumably due to the use of low kVp and high mAs at all hospitals compared to the recommendations by National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB), International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and European Commission (EC). ","PeriodicalId":213779,"journal":{"name":"Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":" 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose Optimization and Radiation Safety for Paediatric Patients in North Eastern Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Habib Saad, Umar Ibrahim, Samson D. Yusuf, A. Alhaji, Bappah S. Yahaya, M.M. Sidi\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/dujopas.v10i2b.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ionizing radiation from medical sources, primarily diagnostic X-rays, constitutes the largest artificial contribution. Variances in patient doses across radiological departments for similar examinations prompted surveys on patient doses in diagnostic radiology globally. The study Assess the Entrance Skin Dose for paediatric patients during specific radiological exams (Chest AP/PA, Skull AP, and Pelvic AP) and then compare the findings to the diagnostic reference levels established by international organizations. Three x-ray machines from three different tertiary health institutions with facilities for paediatric radiography were used under clinical conditions for the selected radiological examinations. A total of 135 TL dosimeter chips positioned selectively on patients at the axis of the primary X-ray beam to capture entrance skin dose/dose equivalent Hp (0.07). The TLD chips underwent analysis by heating using Harshaw 4500 automatic TLD reader and ESD for each patient was calculated using a given equation. Result indicated that the total average maximum and minimum mean and standard error (SE) value of age group of the participants are 0.60±0.3 – 13.50±0.7, tube loading kVp as 54.90±0.0 – 73.70±1.3 and tube current mAs 4.5±0.2 – 12.5±1.0 respectively. The mean values of ESDs found at each hospital are much higher than, the same published studies and the internationally recommended values and dose reference levels by National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB), International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), and European Commission (EU). This is presumably due to the use of low kVp and high mAs at all hospitals compared to the recommendations by National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB), International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and European Commission (EC). \",\"PeriodicalId\":213779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 43\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/dujopas.v10i2b.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/dujopas.v10i2b.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
来自医疗源的电离辐射,主要是诊断 X 射线,是最大的人为辐射。各放射科在进行类似检查时,病人的剂量存在差异,这促使在全球范围内对放射诊断的病人剂量进行调查。该研究评估了儿科患者在接受特定放射检查(胸部 AP/PA、头颅 AP 和骨盆 AP)时的皮肤入口剂量,然后将评估结果与国际组织制定的诊断参考水平进行比较。三台X光机分别来自三家拥有儿科放射设备的三级医疗机构,在临床条件下进行了选定的放射检查。共有 135 个 TL 剂量计芯片被有选择性地放置在主要 X 射线束轴线处的患者身上,以捕获入口皮肤剂量/剂量当量 Hp (0.07)。使用 Harshaw 4500 自动 TLD 阅读器对 TLD 芯片进行加热分析,并使用给定方程计算每位患者的 ESD。结果显示,参与者年龄组的总平均最大值和最小值以及标准误差(SE)分别为 0.60±0.3 - 13.50±0.7,电子管负载 kVp 为 54.90±0.0 - 73.70±1.3,电子管电流 mAs 为 4.5±0.2 - 12.5±1.0。各医院发现的 ESD 平均值远高于已发表的相同研究以及国家辐射防护委员会(NRPB)、国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)和欧盟委员会(EU)的国际推荐值和剂量参考水平。这可能是由于与国家辐射防护委员会、国际辐射防护委员会和欧盟委员会的建议相比,所有医院都使用了低 kVp 和高 mAs。
Dose Optimization and Radiation Safety for Paediatric Patients in North Eastern Nigeria
Ionizing radiation from medical sources, primarily diagnostic X-rays, constitutes the largest artificial contribution. Variances in patient doses across radiological departments for similar examinations prompted surveys on patient doses in diagnostic radiology globally. The study Assess the Entrance Skin Dose for paediatric patients during specific radiological exams (Chest AP/PA, Skull AP, and Pelvic AP) and then compare the findings to the diagnostic reference levels established by international organizations. Three x-ray machines from three different tertiary health institutions with facilities for paediatric radiography were used under clinical conditions for the selected radiological examinations. A total of 135 TL dosimeter chips positioned selectively on patients at the axis of the primary X-ray beam to capture entrance skin dose/dose equivalent Hp (0.07). The TLD chips underwent analysis by heating using Harshaw 4500 automatic TLD reader and ESD for each patient was calculated using a given equation. Result indicated that the total average maximum and minimum mean and standard error (SE) value of age group of the participants are 0.60±0.3 – 13.50±0.7, tube loading kVp as 54.90±0.0 – 73.70±1.3 and tube current mAs 4.5±0.2 – 12.5±1.0 respectively. The mean values of ESDs found at each hospital are much higher than, the same published studies and the internationally recommended values and dose reference levels by National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB), International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), and European Commission (EU). This is presumably due to the use of low kVp and high mAs at all hospitals compared to the recommendations by National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB), International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and European Commission (EC).