本体论人类学视角下的图像学及其模式(礼仪、艺术、精神、神秘学

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Lidia Macheta
{"title":"本体论人类学视角下的图像学及其模式(礼仪、艺术、精神、神秘学","authors":"Lidia Macheta","doi":"10.24425/slo.2024.150658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses iconography as a phenomenon of theo-anthropology. The general aim of these analyses is to explain the essence of iconography from the perspective of ontological anthropology – by relating it to the human existence in terms of the possibility and duty of being oneself. In this article, we consider the hypothesis according to which icon-writing has four main complementary formulations: liturgical (icon-writing as a liturgical process), artistic (icon-writing as God’s art), spiritual (icon-writing as spirituality), mystical (icon-writing as prayer). Confirming the truth of the hypothesis constitutes our main goal. We are heading towards it through the implementation of two main research tasks. In the first of them, we demonstrate that each of the assumed models of iconography contains four components (liturgical, artistic, spiritual, mystical), but in each model only one of them dominates, and it is from its perspective that the others are understood. In the second task, we show that each of these models is based on a different onto-anthropological principle – one of the four main ones (community, reflexivity, ethics, religiosity) – corresponding to one of the dimensions of the human existence in ontological terms, the concept of which we adopt for the purposes of this article. A given anthropological principle determines which of the elements of iconography dominates, i.e. what it is above all.","PeriodicalId":35094,"journal":{"name":"Slavia Orientalis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ikonopisanie i jego modele (liturgiczny, artystyczny, duchowy, mistyczny) w świetle teo-antropologii ontologicznej\",\"authors\":\"Lidia Macheta\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/slo.2024.150658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses iconography as a phenomenon of theo-anthropology. The general aim of these analyses is to explain the essence of iconography from the perspective of ontological anthropology – by relating it to the human existence in terms of the possibility and duty of being oneself. In this article, we consider the hypothesis according to which icon-writing has four main complementary formulations: liturgical (icon-writing as a liturgical process), artistic (icon-writing as God’s art), spiritual (icon-writing as spirituality), mystical (icon-writing as prayer). Confirming the truth of the hypothesis constitutes our main goal. We are heading towards it through the implementation of two main research tasks. In the first of them, we demonstrate that each of the assumed models of iconography contains four components (liturgical, artistic, spiritual, mystical), but in each model only one of them dominates, and it is from its perspective that the others are understood. In the second task, we show that each of these models is based on a different onto-anthropological principle – one of the four main ones (community, reflexivity, ethics, religiosity) – corresponding to one of the dimensions of the human existence in ontological terms, the concept of which we adopt for the purposes of this article. A given anthropological principle determines which of the elements of iconography dominates, i.e. what it is above all.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slavia Orientalis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slavia Orientalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/slo.2024.150658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavia Orientalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/slo.2024.150658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章将图标学作为人类学的一种现象进行讨论。这些分析的总体目标是从本体论人类学的角度解释圣像学的本质--将圣像学与人的存在联系起来,即人存在的可能性和责任。在本文中,我们将考虑这样一种假设,即圣像书写有四种主要的互补形式:礼仪性(作为礼仪过程的圣像书写)、艺术性(作为上帝艺术的圣像书写)、精神性(作为灵性的圣像书写)和神秘性(作为祈祷的圣像书写)。证实假设的真实性是我们的主要目标。我们通过实施两项主要研究任务来实现这一目标。在第一项任务中,我们证明每种假定的圣像学模式都包含四个组成部分(礼仪、艺术、精神、神秘),但在每种模式中,只有其中一种占主导地位,而且只有从它的角度才能理解其他组成部分。在第二项任务中,我们要说明的是,这些模式中的每一种都基于不同的人类学原则--四大原则之一(社群、反身性、伦理、宗教性)--与本体论意义上的人类存在的一个维度相对应,我们在本文中采用了本体论的概念。特定的人类学原则决定了图像学的主导要素,即它首先是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ikonopisanie i jego modele (liturgiczny, artystyczny, duchowy, mistyczny) w świetle teo-antropologii ontologicznej
The article discusses iconography as a phenomenon of theo-anthropology. The general aim of these analyses is to explain the essence of iconography from the perspective of ontological anthropology – by relating it to the human existence in terms of the possibility and duty of being oneself. In this article, we consider the hypothesis according to which icon-writing has four main complementary formulations: liturgical (icon-writing as a liturgical process), artistic (icon-writing as God’s art), spiritual (icon-writing as spirituality), mystical (icon-writing as prayer). Confirming the truth of the hypothesis constitutes our main goal. We are heading towards it through the implementation of two main research tasks. In the first of them, we demonstrate that each of the assumed models of iconography contains four components (liturgical, artistic, spiritual, mystical), but in each model only one of them dominates, and it is from its perspective that the others are understood. In the second task, we show that each of these models is based on a different onto-anthropological principle – one of the four main ones (community, reflexivity, ethics, religiosity) – corresponding to one of the dimensions of the human existence in ontological terms, the concept of which we adopt for the purposes of this article. A given anthropological principle determines which of the elements of iconography dominates, i.e. what it is above all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Slavia Orientalis
Slavia Orientalis Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信