按首选家庭语言划分的儿科发育行为评估远程保健使用率差异:发育行为儿科研究网络研究

Kate E. Wallis, Annie Kennelly, Sarah N. Wozniak, Sansanee Craig, Carina M. Flaherty, Jaclyn Cacia, Audrey Christiansen, Lucero Cordero, Priscilla Ortiz, Katherine S. Kellom, Kristen J Stefanski
{"title":"按首选家庭语言划分的儿科发育行为评估远程保健使用率差异:发育行为儿科研究网络研究","authors":"Kate E. Wallis, Annie Kennelly, Sarah N. Wozniak, Sansanee Craig, Carina M. Flaherty, Jaclyn Cacia, Audrey Christiansen, Lucero Cordero, Priscilla Ortiz, Katherine S. Kellom, Kristen J Stefanski","doi":"10.1097/dbp.0000000000001290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many developmental-behavioral pediatric (DBP) practices adopted telehealth for care delivery. However, telehealth access and use for families with a preferred language other than English (PLOE) is an equity concern. Therefore, our study objective is to compare rates of telehealth utilization and visit completion by preferred family language among patients seen for DBP assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic.\n \n \n \n We completed a descriptive chart review using electronic health record data at 4 academic DBP practices to examine visits for patients up to 5 years seen for new-patient appointments between April 2020 and April 2021. We compared rates of in-person and telehealth visits by preferred family language and visit outcome (completed or missed).\n \n \n \n A total of 3241 visits were scheduled between April 2020 and April 2021; 48.2% were for in-person and 51.8% for telehealth. Families reported the following languages: 90.5% English, 6.2% Spanish, and 3.3% other language. Missed visits accounted for 7.6% of scheduled visits. The relative percentage of in-person versus telehealth visits varied significantly by site (p < 0.001) and preferred family language (p < 0.001). English-speaking patients had 2.10 times the odds of being scheduled for telehealth compared with patients with PLOE, adjusting for site. Statistically significant differences were not found for visit outcome (completed or missed) by visit type (in-person or telehealth) (p = 0.79), including after accounting for PLOE status (p = 0.83).\n \n \n \n At the height of the pandemic, most English-speaking families were scheduled for new DBP evaluations by telehealth, but fewer families with PLOE were. Attention to language to ensure telehealth access equity is critical.\n","PeriodicalId":351181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental &amp; Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Telehealth Uptake for Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric Assessments by Preferred Family Language: A Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network Study\",\"authors\":\"Kate E. Wallis, Annie Kennelly, Sarah N. Wozniak, Sansanee Craig, Carina M. Flaherty, Jaclyn Cacia, Audrey Christiansen, Lucero Cordero, Priscilla Ortiz, Katherine S. Kellom, Kristen J Stefanski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/dbp.0000000000001290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many developmental-behavioral pediatric (DBP) practices adopted telehealth for care delivery. However, telehealth access and use for families with a preferred language other than English (PLOE) is an equity concern. Therefore, our study objective is to compare rates of telehealth utilization and visit completion by preferred family language among patients seen for DBP assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic.\\n \\n \\n \\n We completed a descriptive chart review using electronic health record data at 4 academic DBP practices to examine visits for patients up to 5 years seen for new-patient appointments between April 2020 and April 2021. We compared rates of in-person and telehealth visits by preferred family language and visit outcome (completed or missed).\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 3241 visits were scheduled between April 2020 and April 2021; 48.2% were for in-person and 51.8% for telehealth. Families reported the following languages: 90.5% English, 6.2% Spanish, and 3.3% other language. Missed visits accounted for 7.6% of scheduled visits. The relative percentage of in-person versus telehealth visits varied significantly by site (p < 0.001) and preferred family language (p < 0.001). English-speaking patients had 2.10 times the odds of being scheduled for telehealth compared with patients with PLOE, adjusting for site. Statistically significant differences were not found for visit outcome (completed or missed) by visit type (in-person or telehealth) (p = 0.79), including after accounting for PLOE status (p = 0.83).\\n \\n \\n \\n At the height of the pandemic, most English-speaking families were scheduled for new DBP evaluations by telehealth, but fewer families with PLOE were. Attention to language to ensure telehealth access equity is critical.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":351181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Developmental &amp; Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Developmental &amp; Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0000000000001290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental &amp; Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0000000000001290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,许多发育行为儿科(DBP)诊所采用远程医疗提供护理服务。然而,使用英语以外语言(PLOE)的家庭能否获得和使用远程保健服务是一个值得关注的公平问题。因此,我们的研究目标是比较在 COVID-19 大流行期间接受 DBP 评估的患者中,根据首选家庭语言划分的远程医疗使用率和就诊完成率。 我们利用 4 家学术性 DBP 诊所的电子健康记录数据完成了一项描述性病历审查,以检查 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 4 月期间接受新患者预约的 5 岁以下患者的就诊情况。我们按首选家庭语言和就诊结果(完成或错过)比较了亲诊和远程医疗就诊率。 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 4 月期间共安排了 3241 次就诊,其中 48.2% 为面对面就诊,51.8% 为远程医疗就诊。家庭报告的语言如下:90.5%为英语,6.2%为西班牙语,3.3%为其他语言。错过的就诊次数占预定就诊次数的 7.6%。不同地点(p < 0.001)和首选家庭语言(p < 0.001)的亲诊与远程医疗的相对比例差异显著。与 PLOE 患者相比,讲英语的患者被安排接受远程医疗的几率是讲 PLOE 患者的 2.10 倍(根据就诊地点进行调整)。就就诊结果(完成或错过)而言,就诊类型(面对面或远程医疗)没有发现明显的统计学差异(p = 0.79),包括在考虑了 PLOE 状态后(p = 0.83)。 在大流行的高峰期,大多数讲英语的家庭都通过远程医疗安排了新的 DBP 评估,但有 PLOE 的家庭则较少。关注语言以确保远程保健的公平性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Telehealth Uptake for Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric Assessments by Preferred Family Language: A Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network Study
Owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many developmental-behavioral pediatric (DBP) practices adopted telehealth for care delivery. However, telehealth access and use for families with a preferred language other than English (PLOE) is an equity concern. Therefore, our study objective is to compare rates of telehealth utilization and visit completion by preferred family language among patients seen for DBP assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic. We completed a descriptive chart review using electronic health record data at 4 academic DBP practices to examine visits for patients up to 5 years seen for new-patient appointments between April 2020 and April 2021. We compared rates of in-person and telehealth visits by preferred family language and visit outcome (completed or missed). A total of 3241 visits were scheduled between April 2020 and April 2021; 48.2% were for in-person and 51.8% for telehealth. Families reported the following languages: 90.5% English, 6.2% Spanish, and 3.3% other language. Missed visits accounted for 7.6% of scheduled visits. The relative percentage of in-person versus telehealth visits varied significantly by site (p < 0.001) and preferred family language (p < 0.001). English-speaking patients had 2.10 times the odds of being scheduled for telehealth compared with patients with PLOE, adjusting for site. Statistically significant differences were not found for visit outcome (completed or missed) by visit type (in-person or telehealth) (p = 0.79), including after accounting for PLOE status (p = 0.83). At the height of the pandemic, most English-speaking families were scheduled for new DBP evaluations by telehealth, but fewer families with PLOE were. Attention to language to ensure telehealth access equity is critical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信