复发性多发性硬化症患者二线治疗指南回顾:2024 年更新

Cadth
{"title":"复发性多发性硬化症患者二线治疗指南回顾:2024 年更新","authors":"Cadth","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Issue? \n \nMultiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disorder that causes damage to central nervous system cells. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is characterized by relapses (episodes of new or worsening symptoms) followed by periods of partial or complete recovery (remission). \nFirst-line therapies for multiple sclerosis include interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide. Second-line therapies include natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and fingolimod. \nThe considerations for switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are unclear. \n \nWhat Did We Do? \n \nTo inform decisions around switching patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from a first-line to a second-line therapy, we sought to identify and summarize recommendations from evidence-based guidelines. \nWe searched key resources, including journal citation databases, and conducted a focused internet search for relevant evidence published since 2019. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included guidelines, and narratively summarized the findings. \n \nWhat Did We Find? \n \nWe identified 2 evidence-based guidelines that included recommendations around switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. \nOne guideline from Spain classified therapies as moderate-efficacy (interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide) and high-efficacy (fingolimod, cladribine, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab). The guideline recommends that patients switch from a moderate-efficacy disease-modifying therapy to a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy for a variety of reasons including suboptimal response, adverse events, comorbidities, pregnancy plans, confirmed progression of disability, and tolerability issues. The guideline also included several recommendations specific to switching to natalizumab as well as washout periods when switching from a moderate-efficacy therapy. \nOne guideline from France included recommendations regarding washout periods for switching from a first-line therapy. The guideline recommends that when switching from a first-line therapy, a second-line therapy or an induction therapy could be started without a washout period if the patient has normal biological results. The guideline also recommends validating the indication, timing, and washout period of a switch to a second-line therapy or induction therapy with a multiple sclerosis expert centre or in a multidisciplinary consensus meeting. The guideline also included specific considerations for washout periods for dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide. \n \nWhat Does It Mean? \n \nThe considerations for switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis — including the timing of a switch, choice of second-line therapy, and washout periods — depend on treatment response, individual patient characteristics, and the specific first-line therapy being used. \nAdditional evidence-based guidelines that use comprehensive methods for identifying evidence and include clear links between identified evidence and recommendations will help to reduce uncertainty around considerations for switching from first-line to second-line therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. \n","PeriodicalId":505661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Guidelines on Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A 2024 Update\",\"authors\":\"Cadth\",\"doi\":\"10.51731/cjht.2024.931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What Is the Issue? \\n \\nMultiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disorder that causes damage to central nervous system cells. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is characterized by relapses (episodes of new or worsening symptoms) followed by periods of partial or complete recovery (remission). \\nFirst-line therapies for multiple sclerosis include interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide. Second-line therapies include natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and fingolimod. \\nThe considerations for switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are unclear. \\n \\nWhat Did We Do? \\n \\nTo inform decisions around switching patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from a first-line to a second-line therapy, we sought to identify and summarize recommendations from evidence-based guidelines. \\nWe searched key resources, including journal citation databases, and conducted a focused internet search for relevant evidence published since 2019. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included guidelines, and narratively summarized the findings. \\n \\nWhat Did We Find? \\n \\nWe identified 2 evidence-based guidelines that included recommendations around switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. \\nOne guideline from Spain classified therapies as moderate-efficacy (interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide) and high-efficacy (fingolimod, cladribine, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab). The guideline recommends that patients switch from a moderate-efficacy disease-modifying therapy to a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy for a variety of reasons including suboptimal response, adverse events, comorbidities, pregnancy plans, confirmed progression of disability, and tolerability issues. The guideline also included several recommendations specific to switching to natalizumab as well as washout periods when switching from a moderate-efficacy therapy. \\nOne guideline from France included recommendations regarding washout periods for switching from a first-line therapy. The guideline recommends that when switching from a first-line therapy, a second-line therapy or an induction therapy could be started without a washout period if the patient has normal biological results. The guideline also recommends validating the indication, timing, and washout period of a switch to a second-line therapy or induction therapy with a multiple sclerosis expert centre or in a multidisciplinary consensus meeting. The guideline also included specific considerations for washout periods for dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide. \\n \\nWhat Does It Mean? \\n \\nThe considerations for switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis — including the timing of a switch, choice of second-line therapy, and washout periods — depend on treatment response, individual patient characteristics, and the specific first-line therapy being used. \\nAdditional evidence-based guidelines that use comprehensive methods for identifying evidence and include clear links between identified evidence and recommendations will help to reduce uncertainty around considerations for switching from first-line to second-line therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":505661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题是什么? 多发性硬化症是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,会对中枢神经系统细胞造成损害。复发-缓解型多发性硬化症的特点是复发(出现新症状或症状恶化),随后是部分或完全恢复(缓解)期。多发性硬化症的一线疗法包括干扰素、醋酸格拉替雷、富马酸二甲酯和特立氟胺。二线疗法包括纳他珠单抗、阿仑妥珠单抗和芬戈莫德。复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者从一线疗法转为二线疗法的注意事项尚不明确。 我们做了什么? 为了给复发性多发性硬化症患者从一线疗法转为二线疗法的决策提供参考,我们试图识别并总结循证指南中的建议。我们搜索了关键资源,包括期刊引文数据库,并在互联网上重点搜索了自 2019 年以来发表的相关证据。一位审稿人根据预先定义的标准筛选了纳入文章,对纳入的指南进行了严格评估,并对结果进行了叙述性总结。 我们发现了什么? 我们发现了 2 份循证指南,其中包括关于复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者从一线疗法转为二线疗法的建议。其中一份来自西班牙的指南将疗法分为中效疗法(干扰素、醋酸格拉替雷、富马酸二甲酯和特利氟胺)和高效疗法(芬戈莫德、克拉利宾、奥克利珠单抗、纳他珠单抗和阿来珠单抗)。该指南建议患者出于各种原因,包括次优反应、不良事件、合并症、妊娠计划、确认的残疾进展以及耐受性问题,从中度疗效的疾病修饰疗法转为高效疗效的疾病修饰疗法。该指南还包括几项专门针对转用纳他珠单抗的建议,以及从中等疗效疗法转为纳他珠单抗时的冲洗期。法国的一份指南包含了关于从一线疗法转用纳他珠单抗的冲洗期建议。该指南建议,在从一线疗法转换到二线疗法或诱导疗法时,如果患者的生物学结果正常,则可以开始二线疗法或诱导疗法,而无需冲洗期。该指南还建议与多发性硬化症专家中心或在多学科共识会议上验证转用二线疗法或诱导疗法的适应症、时机和冲洗期。该指南还包括富马酸二甲酯和特立氟胺冲洗期的具体注意事项。 这意味着什么? 复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者从一线疗法转为二线疗法的注意事项--包括转换时机、二线疗法的选择和冲洗期--取决于治疗反应、患者个体特征和正在使用的特定一线疗法。更多的循证指南应采用全面的方法来识别证据,并在已识别的证据和建议之间建立明确的联系,这将有助于减少复发性多发性硬化症患者从一线疗法转为二线疗法的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Guidelines on Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A 2024 Update
What Is the Issue? Multiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disorder that causes damage to central nervous system cells. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is characterized by relapses (episodes of new or worsening symptoms) followed by periods of partial or complete recovery (remission). First-line therapies for multiple sclerosis include interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide. Second-line therapies include natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and fingolimod. The considerations for switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are unclear. What Did We Do? To inform decisions around switching patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from a first-line to a second-line therapy, we sought to identify and summarize recommendations from evidence-based guidelines. We searched key resources, including journal citation databases, and conducted a focused internet search for relevant evidence published since 2019. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included guidelines, and narratively summarized the findings. What Did We Find? We identified 2 evidence-based guidelines that included recommendations around switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. One guideline from Spain classified therapies as moderate-efficacy (interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide) and high-efficacy (fingolimod, cladribine, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab). The guideline recommends that patients switch from a moderate-efficacy disease-modifying therapy to a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy for a variety of reasons including suboptimal response, adverse events, comorbidities, pregnancy plans, confirmed progression of disability, and tolerability issues. The guideline also included several recommendations specific to switching to natalizumab as well as washout periods when switching from a moderate-efficacy therapy. One guideline from France included recommendations regarding washout periods for switching from a first-line therapy. The guideline recommends that when switching from a first-line therapy, a second-line therapy or an induction therapy could be started without a washout period if the patient has normal biological results. The guideline also recommends validating the indication, timing, and washout period of a switch to a second-line therapy or induction therapy with a multiple sclerosis expert centre or in a multidisciplinary consensus meeting. The guideline also included specific considerations for washout periods for dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide. What Does It Mean? The considerations for switching from a first-line to a second-line therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis — including the timing of a switch, choice of second-line therapy, and washout periods — depend on treatment response, individual patient characteristics, and the specific first-line therapy being used. Additional evidence-based guidelines that use comprehensive methods for identifying evidence and include clear links between identified evidence and recommendations will help to reduce uncertainty around considerations for switching from first-line to second-line therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信