对以环境、社会和公司治理原则为基础的高管薪酬政策的严格审查

Nick Ammel, Stacy Boyer-Davis, Mackenzie Karki
{"title":"对以环境、社会和公司治理原则为基础的高管薪酬政策的严格审查","authors":"Nick Ammel, Stacy Boyer-Davis, Mackenzie Karki","doi":"10.33423/jsis.v19i2.7110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High executive salaries often lead executives to prioritize short-term gains over long-term ESG benefits. This review explores how reducing executive compensation, influenced by environmental regulations, impacts innovation in sustainable technologies. As shareholders demand more ESG-focused models, the traditional compensation model is shifting to link compensation with environmental and social goals. The literature focuses on greenhouse gas emissions, employee satisfaction, and regulatory compliance. This review covers global ESG-based incentives, followed by country-specific approaches in China, France, Germany, India, Italy, South Africa, Sweden, and the United States. It concludes with alternative frameworks from financial institutions. Executives are more likely to engage in environmental initiatives when personal gains are tied to these goals. Equity-based incentives are favored over salary-based bonuses. Concepts like the parity pill aim to increase investor trust and transparency. As investors become more environmentally conscious, they expect companies to align with these values. Executives are encouraged to prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term personal gains.","PeriodicalId":197350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability","volume":"121 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Review of Executive Compensation Policies Grounded in ESG Principles\",\"authors\":\"Nick Ammel, Stacy Boyer-Davis, Mackenzie Karki\",\"doi\":\"10.33423/jsis.v19i2.7110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High executive salaries often lead executives to prioritize short-term gains over long-term ESG benefits. This review explores how reducing executive compensation, influenced by environmental regulations, impacts innovation in sustainable technologies. As shareholders demand more ESG-focused models, the traditional compensation model is shifting to link compensation with environmental and social goals. The literature focuses on greenhouse gas emissions, employee satisfaction, and regulatory compliance. This review covers global ESG-based incentives, followed by country-specific approaches in China, France, Germany, India, Italy, South Africa, Sweden, and the United States. It concludes with alternative frameworks from financial institutions. Executives are more likely to engage in environmental initiatives when personal gains are tied to these goals. Equity-based incentives are favored over salary-based bonuses. Concepts like the parity pill aim to increase investor trust and transparency. As investors become more environmentally conscious, they expect companies to align with these values. Executives are encouraged to prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term personal gains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"121 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i2.7110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i2.7110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高管的高薪往往导致高管优先考虑短期收益,而不是长期的环境、社会和公司治理效益。本综述探讨了在环境法规的影响下,降低高管薪酬如何影响可持续技术的创新。随着股东要求更加注重环境、社会和公司治理的模式,传统的薪酬模式正在转变为将薪酬与环境和社会目标挂钩。相关文献主要关注温室气体排放、员工满意度和监管合规性。本综述涵盖了全球基于环境、社会和公司治理的激励机制,随后介绍了中国、法国、德国、印度、意大利、南非、瑞典和美国等国的具体方法。最后还介绍了金融机构的替代框架。当个人收益与环保目标挂钩时,高管更有可能参与环保行动。股权激励比工资奖金更受欢迎。平等药丸等概念旨在提高投资者的信任度和透明度。随着投资者的环保意识越来越强,他们希望公司能与这些价值观保持一致。鼓励高管优先考虑长期可持续发展,而不是短期个人利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Review of Executive Compensation Policies Grounded in ESG Principles
High executive salaries often lead executives to prioritize short-term gains over long-term ESG benefits. This review explores how reducing executive compensation, influenced by environmental regulations, impacts innovation in sustainable technologies. As shareholders demand more ESG-focused models, the traditional compensation model is shifting to link compensation with environmental and social goals. The literature focuses on greenhouse gas emissions, employee satisfaction, and regulatory compliance. This review covers global ESG-based incentives, followed by country-specific approaches in China, France, Germany, India, Italy, South Africa, Sweden, and the United States. It concludes with alternative frameworks from financial institutions. Executives are more likely to engage in environmental initiatives when personal gains are tied to these goals. Equity-based incentives are favored over salary-based bonuses. Concepts like the parity pill aim to increase investor trust and transparency. As investors become more environmentally conscious, they expect companies to align with these values. Executives are encouraged to prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term personal gains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信