比较预测不同厄尔尼诺/南方涛动类型的机器学习模型

C. Ibebuchi, Seth Rainey, O. Obarein, Silva Alindomar, Cameron C. Lee
{"title":"比较预测不同厄尔尼诺/南方涛动类型的机器学习模型","authors":"C. Ibebuchi, Seth Rainey, O. Obarein, Silva Alindomar, Cameron C. Lee","doi":"10.1088/1402-4896/ad65c5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Accurate forecasting of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) plays a critical role in mitigating the impacts of extreme weather conditions linked to ENSO variability on ecosystems. This study evaluates the performance of six machine learning models in forecasting two ENSO types: the Central Pacific El Niño (Niño 4 index) and the East Central Pacific El Niño (Niño 3.4 index). The models analyzed include the Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN), Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) neural network, eXtreme Gradient Boosting Regressor, K-Nearest Neighbors Regressor, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and Support Vector Regressor, using the ENSO index lagged by six months as the predictor. The models were trained on the monthly ENSO indices from 1870 to 1992 and tested from 1993 to 2023. We also assess the relative predictability of the two ENSO types. Events were defined as when the ENSO index exceeded ±0.4. Our evaluation during the testing period reveals that for the analyzed models, the deep neural network models (LSTM and FFNN) demonstrated superior performance in forecasting ENSO at a 6-month lead time. Furthermore, all models achieved impressive all-season correlations ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 and threat score for the ENSO phases between 0.71 to 0.88 for Niño 3.4 events, and 0.72 to 0.93 for Niño 4 events. The predictability of the two ENSO types depended on the model and strength of the ENSO event. Considering both ENSO phases, La Niña events were forecasted with a higher accuracy relative to El Niño events, and all models, besides the deep learning models, notably fell short in capturing the extreme 2015/2016 Central Pacific El Niño event. These results highlight the potential of machine learning models, particularly the deep learning approaches, for skillful ENSO forecasting, by leveraging its historical data.","PeriodicalId":503429,"journal":{"name":"Physica Scripta","volume":"121 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of machine learning models in forecasting different ENSO types\",\"authors\":\"C. Ibebuchi, Seth Rainey, O. Obarein, Silva Alindomar, Cameron C. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1402-4896/ad65c5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Accurate forecasting of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) plays a critical role in mitigating the impacts of extreme weather conditions linked to ENSO variability on ecosystems. This study evaluates the performance of six machine learning models in forecasting two ENSO types: the Central Pacific El Niño (Niño 4 index) and the East Central Pacific El Niño (Niño 3.4 index). The models analyzed include the Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN), Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) neural network, eXtreme Gradient Boosting Regressor, K-Nearest Neighbors Regressor, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and Support Vector Regressor, using the ENSO index lagged by six months as the predictor. The models were trained on the monthly ENSO indices from 1870 to 1992 and tested from 1993 to 2023. We also assess the relative predictability of the two ENSO types. Events were defined as when the ENSO index exceeded ±0.4. Our evaluation during the testing period reveals that for the analyzed models, the deep neural network models (LSTM and FFNN) demonstrated superior performance in forecasting ENSO at a 6-month lead time. Furthermore, all models achieved impressive all-season correlations ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 and threat score for the ENSO phases between 0.71 to 0.88 for Niño 3.4 events, and 0.72 to 0.93 for Niño 4 events. The predictability of the two ENSO types depended on the model and strength of the ENSO event. Considering both ENSO phases, La Niña events were forecasted with a higher accuracy relative to El Niño events, and all models, besides the deep learning models, notably fell short in capturing the extreme 2015/2016 Central Pacific El Niño event. These results highlight the potential of machine learning models, particularly the deep learning approaches, for skillful ENSO forecasting, by leveraging its historical data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Scripta\",\"volume\":\"121 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Scripta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad65c5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Scripta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad65c5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确预报厄尔尼诺南方涛动(ENSO)对减轻与厄尔尼诺南方涛动变率相关的极端天气条件对生态系统的影响起着至关重要的作用。本研究评估了六种机器学习模型在预测两种厄尔尼诺/南方涛动类型方面的性能:中太平洋厄尔尼诺现象(厄尔尼诺 4 指数)和东中太平洋厄尔尼诺现象(厄尔尼诺 3.4 指数)。分析的模型包括前馈神经网络(FFNN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)神经网络、极端梯度提升回归器、K-近邻回归器、梯度提升回归器和支持向量回归器,使用滞后 6 个月的厄尔尼诺/南方涛动指数作为预测因子。这些模型根据 1870 年至 1992 年的厄尔尼诺/南方涛动月度指数进行训练,并在 1993 年至 2023 年期间进行测试。我们还评估了两种厄尔尼诺/南方涛动类型的相对可预测性。当厄尔尼诺/南方涛动指数超过±0.4时,就定义为事件。我们在测试期间进行的评估显示,在分析的模型中,深度神经网络模型(LSTM 和 FFNN)在 6 个月前预报 ENSO 方面表现出色。此外,所有模型都取得了令人印象深刻的全季节相关性,从 0.93 到 0.97 不等,厄尔尼诺/南方涛动阶段的威胁得分在 0.71 到 0.88 之间(针对 3.4 级厄尔尼诺事件)和 0.72 到 0.93 之间(针对 4 级厄尔尼诺事件)。两种厄尔尼诺/南方涛动类型的可预测性取决于厄尔尼诺/南方涛动事件的模式和强度。考虑到两个厄尔尼诺/南方涛动阶段,相对于厄尔尼诺事件,拉尼娜事件的预测准确率更高,而除了深度学习模型外,所有模型在捕捉2015/2016年中太平洋厄尔尼诺极端事件方面都明显不足。这些结果凸显了机器学习模型,特别是深度学习方法的潜力,可利用其历史数据进行熟练的厄尔尼诺/南方涛动预报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of machine learning models in forecasting different ENSO types
Accurate forecasting of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) plays a critical role in mitigating the impacts of extreme weather conditions linked to ENSO variability on ecosystems. This study evaluates the performance of six machine learning models in forecasting two ENSO types: the Central Pacific El Niño (Niño 4 index) and the East Central Pacific El Niño (Niño 3.4 index). The models analyzed include the Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN), Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) neural network, eXtreme Gradient Boosting Regressor, K-Nearest Neighbors Regressor, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and Support Vector Regressor, using the ENSO index lagged by six months as the predictor. The models were trained on the monthly ENSO indices from 1870 to 1992 and tested from 1993 to 2023. We also assess the relative predictability of the two ENSO types. Events were defined as when the ENSO index exceeded ±0.4. Our evaluation during the testing period reveals that for the analyzed models, the deep neural network models (LSTM and FFNN) demonstrated superior performance in forecasting ENSO at a 6-month lead time. Furthermore, all models achieved impressive all-season correlations ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 and threat score for the ENSO phases between 0.71 to 0.88 for Niño 3.4 events, and 0.72 to 0.93 for Niño 4 events. The predictability of the two ENSO types depended on the model and strength of the ENSO event. Considering both ENSO phases, La Niña events were forecasted with a higher accuracy relative to El Niño events, and all models, besides the deep learning models, notably fell short in capturing the extreme 2015/2016 Central Pacific El Niño event. These results highlight the potential of machine learning models, particularly the deep learning approaches, for skillful ENSO forecasting, by leveraging its historical data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信