为南非抗逆转录病毒疗法失败的艾滋病毒感染者提供多学科方法

Parisha M. Juta, Juan M. Jansen van Vuuren, Kabamba J. Mbaya
{"title":"为南非抗逆转录病毒疗法失败的艾滋病毒感染者提供多学科方法","authors":"Parisha M. Juta, Juan M. Jansen van Vuuren, Kabamba J. Mbaya","doi":"10.4102/sajhivmed.v25i1.1579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: South Africa (SA) has the largest antiretroviral therapy (ART) programme worldwide. Multiple factors contribute to virological failure (VF), including poor adherence and viral resistance mutations. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinic dedicated to those with VF may be of benefit; however, very little data from SA exist.Objectives: To assess whether an MDT approach achieved virological suppression (VS) in patients failing second-line-ART (2LART); assess the number of MDT sessions required to achieve VS; assess local resistance mutation patterns and whether the MDT reduced the number of genotypic resistance testing (GRT) required.Method: An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional chart review study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2019 at a Target High Viral Load (VL) MDT clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, SA.Results: Ninety-seven medical records were eligible. Women accounted for 63% of patients, with a mean age of 37 years. A significant reduction in the first VL measurement following the MDT was seen (median reduction 2374 c/mL; P  0.001). This was maintained at the second VL measurement post-MDT (median reduction 2957 c/mL; P  0.001). Patients attended a mean of 2.71 MDT sessions and 73.2% achieved VS, resulting in 61.86% fewer GRTs required. Of the GRTs performed, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-related mutations were noted most frequently.Conclusion: The MDT approach resulted in a significant reduction in VL, with most participants achieving VS. The MDT was successful in reducing the need for GRT. Resistance mutations were similar to those found in other studies conducted across SA.","PeriodicalId":94212,"journal":{"name":"Southern African journal of HIV medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multidisciplinary approach for people with HIV failing antiretroviral therapy in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Parisha M. Juta, Juan M. Jansen van Vuuren, Kabamba J. Mbaya\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajhivmed.v25i1.1579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: South Africa (SA) has the largest antiretroviral therapy (ART) programme worldwide. Multiple factors contribute to virological failure (VF), including poor adherence and viral resistance mutations. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinic dedicated to those with VF may be of benefit; however, very little data from SA exist.Objectives: To assess whether an MDT approach achieved virological suppression (VS) in patients failing second-line-ART (2LART); assess the number of MDT sessions required to achieve VS; assess local resistance mutation patterns and whether the MDT reduced the number of genotypic resistance testing (GRT) required.Method: An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional chart review study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2019 at a Target High Viral Load (VL) MDT clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, SA.Results: Ninety-seven medical records were eligible. Women accounted for 63% of patients, with a mean age of 37 years. A significant reduction in the first VL measurement following the MDT was seen (median reduction 2374 c/mL; P  0.001). This was maintained at the second VL measurement post-MDT (median reduction 2957 c/mL; P  0.001). Patients attended a mean of 2.71 MDT sessions and 73.2% achieved VS, resulting in 61.86% fewer GRTs required. Of the GRTs performed, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-related mutations were noted most frequently.Conclusion: The MDT approach resulted in a significant reduction in VL, with most participants achieving VS. The MDT was successful in reducing the need for GRT. Resistance mutations were similar to those found in other studies conducted across SA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African journal of HIV medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African journal of HIV medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v25i1.1579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African journal of HIV medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v25i1.1579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:南非(SA)拥有全球最大的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)计划。导致病毒学失败(VF)的因素有多种,包括依从性差和病毒耐药性突变。多学科团队(MDT)诊所专门为病毒学失败患者提供治疗,可能会有所裨益;然而,南澳的相关数据却很少:评估 MDT 方法是否能使二线ART(2LART)治疗失败的患者达到病毒学抑制(VS);评估达到 VS 所需的 MDT 次数;评估局部耐药突变模式以及 MDT 是否减少了所需的基因型耐药检测(GRT)次数:2018年1月至2019年12月期间,在南澳大利亚夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的目标高病毒负荷(VL)MDT诊所开展了一项观察性、回顾性、横断面病历审查研究:符合条件的病历有 97 份。女性患者占 63%,平均年龄为 37 岁。MDT后,首次VL测量结果明显下降(中位数下降2374 c/mL;P 0.001)。在 MDT 后的第二次 VL 测量中,这一结果得以保持(中位数减少 2957 c/mL;P 0.001)。患者平均参加了 2.71 次 MDT,73.2% 的患者达到了 VS,因此所需的 GRT 减少了 61.86%。在进行的 GRT 中,核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂和非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂相关突变最为常见:结论:MDT 方法显著降低了 VL,大多数参与者实现了 VS。MDT 成功地减少了对 GRT 的需求。耐药突变与南澳大利亚州其他研究中发现的耐药突变相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multidisciplinary approach for people with HIV failing antiretroviral therapy in South Africa
Background: South Africa (SA) has the largest antiretroviral therapy (ART) programme worldwide. Multiple factors contribute to virological failure (VF), including poor adherence and viral resistance mutations. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinic dedicated to those with VF may be of benefit; however, very little data from SA exist.Objectives: To assess whether an MDT approach achieved virological suppression (VS) in patients failing second-line-ART (2LART); assess the number of MDT sessions required to achieve VS; assess local resistance mutation patterns and whether the MDT reduced the number of genotypic resistance testing (GRT) required.Method: An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional chart review study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2019 at a Target High Viral Load (VL) MDT clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, SA.Results: Ninety-seven medical records were eligible. Women accounted for 63% of patients, with a mean age of 37 years. A significant reduction in the first VL measurement following the MDT was seen (median reduction 2374 c/mL; P  0.001). This was maintained at the second VL measurement post-MDT (median reduction 2957 c/mL; P  0.001). Patients attended a mean of 2.71 MDT sessions and 73.2% achieved VS, resulting in 61.86% fewer GRTs required. Of the GRTs performed, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-related mutations were noted most frequently.Conclusion: The MDT approach resulted in a significant reduction in VL, with most participants achieving VS. The MDT was successful in reducing the need for GRT. Resistance mutations were similar to those found in other studies conducted across SA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信