提速及相关问题:二战刚结束后的美国汽车工会与基层不满情绪

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 Arts and Humanities
Timothy J. Minchin
{"title":"提速及相关问题:二战刚结束后的美国汽车工会与基层不满情绪","authors":"Timothy J. Minchin","doi":"10.3828/labourhistory.2024.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship on the United Automobile Workers – for many decades the largest industrial union in the USA – has focused heavily on the landmark wage and benefit gains that the union won, especially through pattern bargaining in the post-World War II era. The UAW has been praised as an “American Vanguard” that secured landmark wages and benefits for its members in widely publicised national contracts, especially in the 1940s and 1950s. This article interrogates this image through the lens of the UAW’s executive board minutes, its top decision-making body. Although bargaining gains in these years were real, the national “pattern” was not as uniform as was reported and was constantly under pressure. Despite the gains, post-war autoworkers had many grievances, especially over workloads and “speed-ups.” Workers testified before the board about these complaints, showing that plant conditions were more important to many than wages and benefits. Usually precipitated by these issues, local strikes were a constant problem. As these records show, there was more to the UAW’s history in these years than pattern bargaining. These findings build on literature that has explored rank-and-file dissatisfaction in the auto industry, but extend it beyond local studies, showing how the union’s top leaders experienced the impact of members’ restlessness. The article also demonstrates that workers’ dissatisfaction occurred much earlier than the 1960s and 1970s, the era that has received more attention, throwing light on the roots of subsequent discontent.","PeriodicalId":44167,"journal":{"name":"Labour History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speed-Ups and Related Problems: The UAW and Grassroots Grievances in the Immediate Post-World War II Period\",\"authors\":\"Timothy J. Minchin\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/labourhistory.2024.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholarship on the United Automobile Workers – for many decades the largest industrial union in the USA – has focused heavily on the landmark wage and benefit gains that the union won, especially through pattern bargaining in the post-World War II era. The UAW has been praised as an “American Vanguard” that secured landmark wages and benefits for its members in widely publicised national contracts, especially in the 1940s and 1950s. This article interrogates this image through the lens of the UAW’s executive board minutes, its top decision-making body. Although bargaining gains in these years were real, the national “pattern” was not as uniform as was reported and was constantly under pressure. Despite the gains, post-war autoworkers had many grievances, especially over workloads and “speed-ups.” Workers testified before the board about these complaints, showing that plant conditions were more important to many than wages and benefits. Usually precipitated by these issues, local strikes were a constant problem. As these records show, there was more to the UAW’s history in these years than pattern bargaining. These findings build on literature that has explored rank-and-file dissatisfaction in the auto industry, but extend it beyond local studies, showing how the union’s top leaders experienced the impact of members’ restlessness. The article also demonstrates that workers’ dissatisfaction occurred much earlier than the 1960s and 1970s, the era that has received more attention, throwing light on the roots of subsequent discontent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/labourhistory.2024.28\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/labourhistory.2024.28","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,美国汽车工人联合会一直是美国最大的工业工会,有关该工会的学术研究主要集中在该工会赢得的具有里程碑意义的工资和福利收益上,尤其是在二战后通过模式谈判赢得的收益。UAW 被赞誉为 "美国先锋",在广为宣传的全国性合同中为其会员争取到了具有里程碑意义的工资和福利,尤其是在 20 世纪 40 年代和 50 年代。本文通过 UAW 的最高决策机构--执行委员会的会议记录来审视这一形象。尽管这些年的谈判成果是真实的,但全国 "模式 "并不像报道的那样统一,而且一直面临压力。尽管取得了成果,但战后汽车工人仍有许多不满,尤其是对工作量和 "提速 "的不满。工人们就这些不满向委员会作证,表明对许多人来说,工厂条件比工资和福利更重要。通常由这些问题引发的地方性罢工一直是个问题。正如这些记录所显示的,这些年 UAW 的历史不仅仅是模式化的谈判。这些发现建立在探讨汽车行业基层不满情绪的文献基础之上,但又超出了地方研究的范围,显示了工会高层领导是如何体验到会员不安情绪所带来的影响的。文章还表明,工人的不满情绪早在 20 世纪 60 年代和 70 年代就已出现,而 20 世纪 60 年代和 70 年代受到了更多关注,这为后来不满情绪的根源提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speed-Ups and Related Problems: The UAW and Grassroots Grievances in the Immediate Post-World War II Period
Scholarship on the United Automobile Workers – for many decades the largest industrial union in the USA – has focused heavily on the landmark wage and benefit gains that the union won, especially through pattern bargaining in the post-World War II era. The UAW has been praised as an “American Vanguard” that secured landmark wages and benefits for its members in widely publicised national contracts, especially in the 1940s and 1950s. This article interrogates this image through the lens of the UAW’s executive board minutes, its top decision-making body. Although bargaining gains in these years were real, the national “pattern” was not as uniform as was reported and was constantly under pressure. Despite the gains, post-war autoworkers had many grievances, especially over workloads and “speed-ups.” Workers testified before the board about these complaints, showing that plant conditions were more important to many than wages and benefits. Usually precipitated by these issues, local strikes were a constant problem. As these records show, there was more to the UAW’s history in these years than pattern bargaining. These findings build on literature that has explored rank-and-file dissatisfaction in the auto industry, but extend it beyond local studies, showing how the union’s top leaders experienced the impact of members’ restlessness. The article also demonstrates that workers’ dissatisfaction occurred much earlier than the 1960s and 1970s, the era that has received more attention, throwing light on the roots of subsequent discontent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labour History
Labour History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信