Mehmet Asaf Düzen, İsmail Buğra Bölükbaşı, E. Calik
{"title":"如何将 ML 和 MCDM 技术相结合:扩展文献计量学分析","authors":"Mehmet Asaf Düzen, İsmail Buğra Bölükbaşı, E. Calik","doi":"10.61112/jiens.1475948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine Learning (ML) and Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) are popular methods that have recently been widely used in many different fields. Due to the increasing use of these two methods together, there is a need for a bibliometric analysis in this area. In this study, an extended author-developed bibliometric analysis was performed on 1189 publications retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases between January 2000 and April 2024. In the initial bibliometric analysis, as a generic part, the VOSviewer program was used to make the data meaningful. In particular, the analysis was carried out according to years and relationships related to the keyword analysis. In addition, the most frequently used keywords were identified, and the direction of the trend was determined. During the initial bibliometric analysis, 308 publications were analyzed, with 297 publications retrieved from the WoS database and 11 publications from Scopus. The study distinguishes itself from the existing literature by establishing new models and categories as an extended part of bibliometric analysis. Using these models and categories, we sought to answer questions about how researchers use ML and MCDM together and in what direction these methods are evolving. In this context, the distribution of models and categories in different research areas and their changes over the years were analyzed. This study provides researchers with a comprehensive perspective on the various combination possibilities when integrating ML and MCDM techniques.","PeriodicalId":306664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science","volume":"43 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to combine ML and MCDM techniques: an extended bibliometric analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Asaf Düzen, İsmail Buğra Bölükbaşı, E. Calik\",\"doi\":\"10.61112/jiens.1475948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine Learning (ML) and Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) are popular methods that have recently been widely used in many different fields. Due to the increasing use of these two methods together, there is a need for a bibliometric analysis in this area. In this study, an extended author-developed bibliometric analysis was performed on 1189 publications retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases between January 2000 and April 2024. In the initial bibliometric analysis, as a generic part, the VOSviewer program was used to make the data meaningful. In particular, the analysis was carried out according to years and relationships related to the keyword analysis. In addition, the most frequently used keywords were identified, and the direction of the trend was determined. During the initial bibliometric analysis, 308 publications were analyzed, with 297 publications retrieved from the WoS database and 11 publications from Scopus. The study distinguishes itself from the existing literature by establishing new models and categories as an extended part of bibliometric analysis. Using these models and categories, we sought to answer questions about how researchers use ML and MCDM together and in what direction these methods are evolving. In this context, the distribution of models and categories in different research areas and their changes over the years were analyzed. This study provides researchers with a comprehensive perspective on the various combination possibilities when integrating ML and MCDM techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science\",\"volume\":\"43 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1475948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovative Engineering and Natural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1475948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
机器学习(ML)和多标准决策(MCDM)是最近在许多不同领域得到广泛应用的流行方法。由于这两种方法的使用越来越多,因此有必要对这一领域进行文献计量分析。本研究对 2000 年 1 月至 2024 年 4 月期间从 Web of Science (WoS) 和 Scopus 数据库中检索到的 1189 篇出版物进行了由作者开发的扩展文献计量分析。在最初的文献计量分析中,作为一个通用部分,使用了 VOSviewer 程序使数据更有意义。特别是,分析是根据年份和与关键词分析相关的关系进行的。此外,还确定了最常使用的关键词,并确定了趋势的方向。在最初的文献计量分析中,共分析了 308 篇出版物,其中 297 篇从 WoS 数据库中检索,11 篇从 Scopus 中检索。这项研究有别于现有文献,它建立了新的模型和类别,作为文献计量分析的扩展部分。利用这些模型和类别,我们试图回答研究人员如何同时使用 ML 和 MCDM 以及这些方法的发展方向等问题。在此背景下,我们分析了模型和类别在不同研究领域中的分布情况及其多年来的变化。这项研究为研究人员提供了一个全面的视角,让他们了解在整合 ML 和 MCDM 技术时的各种组合可能性。
How to combine ML and MCDM techniques: an extended bibliometric analysis
Machine Learning (ML) and Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) are popular methods that have recently been widely used in many different fields. Due to the increasing use of these two methods together, there is a need for a bibliometric analysis in this area. In this study, an extended author-developed bibliometric analysis was performed on 1189 publications retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases between January 2000 and April 2024. In the initial bibliometric analysis, as a generic part, the VOSviewer program was used to make the data meaningful. In particular, the analysis was carried out according to years and relationships related to the keyword analysis. In addition, the most frequently used keywords were identified, and the direction of the trend was determined. During the initial bibliometric analysis, 308 publications were analyzed, with 297 publications retrieved from the WoS database and 11 publications from Scopus. The study distinguishes itself from the existing literature by establishing new models and categories as an extended part of bibliometric analysis. Using these models and categories, we sought to answer questions about how researchers use ML and MCDM together and in what direction these methods are evolving. In this context, the distribution of models and categories in different research areas and their changes over the years were analyzed. This study provides researchers with a comprehensive perspective on the various combination possibilities when integrating ML and MCDM techniques.