Javier Meza-Arroyo, Jesús Valdés-Hernández, J. L. Domínguez-Juárez, R. Quintero-Torres
{"title":"DLS 自制装置:结合 PLAL 合成的纳米粒子尺寸,回顾光源的一阶和二阶相干性及自相关性概念","authors":"Javier Meza-Arroyo, Jesús Valdés-Hernández, J. L. Domínguez-Juárez, R. Quintero-Torres","doi":"10.1088/1402-4896/ad664e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The size of the nanoparticles (NP) is one of the most important and essential characteristics to know the properties of the synthesized nanostructures. The most common characterization procedures are related to Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electronic Microscopy (TEM), and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Unfortunately, from a practical point of view, they represent a time-consuming procedure and require expensive equipment, which limits its application to specialized research groups. Significant attention has been paid to Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) as a simple, fast, and reproducible method for sizing nanoparticles. However, inadequate representation of the fundamental principles of DLS and data interpretation represents two of the most important challenges related to this technique. In this work we try to provide the fundamental principles of the DLS technique, the fundamental mathematical treatment of data obtained during the optical scattering studies and provide the MATLAB code to configure non-commercial DLS equipment. Additionally, analyzes of nanoparticles obtained by pulsed laser ablation of Ag, Au, Si and W and commercial Au nanoparticles were carried out. The particle size results are compared with SEM images to calculate the percentage error of the DLS measurements. The results show an error of 5%, 3.8%, 2.1% for the Ag, Au and Si nanoparticles respectively, which proves to be an excellent approximation to the real values of nanoparticle diameter. Meanwhile, the error in size for W nanoparticles by the same technique and commercial Au nanoparticle is 29% and 12%, which shows the effect of the hydrodynamic diameter of the nanoparticles. This work ends with the analysis of the concentration of nanoparticles and its importance in reliable results of DLS measurements.","PeriodicalId":503429,"journal":{"name":"Physica Scripta","volume":"36 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DLS homemade setup: reviewing first and second-order coherence and autocorrelation concepts of a light source in the context of nanoparticle sizes synthesized by PLAL\",\"authors\":\"Javier Meza-Arroyo, Jesús Valdés-Hernández, J. L. Domínguez-Juárez, R. Quintero-Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1402-4896/ad664e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The size of the nanoparticles (NP) is one of the most important and essential characteristics to know the properties of the synthesized nanostructures. The most common characterization procedures are related to Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electronic Microscopy (TEM), and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Unfortunately, from a practical point of view, they represent a time-consuming procedure and require expensive equipment, which limits its application to specialized research groups. Significant attention has been paid to Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) as a simple, fast, and reproducible method for sizing nanoparticles. However, inadequate representation of the fundamental principles of DLS and data interpretation represents two of the most important challenges related to this technique. In this work we try to provide the fundamental principles of the DLS technique, the fundamental mathematical treatment of data obtained during the optical scattering studies and provide the MATLAB code to configure non-commercial DLS equipment. Additionally, analyzes of nanoparticles obtained by pulsed laser ablation of Ag, Au, Si and W and commercial Au nanoparticles were carried out. The particle size results are compared with SEM images to calculate the percentage error of the DLS measurements. The results show an error of 5%, 3.8%, 2.1% for the Ag, Au and Si nanoparticles respectively, which proves to be an excellent approximation to the real values of nanoparticle diameter. Meanwhile, the error in size for W nanoparticles by the same technique and commercial Au nanoparticle is 29% and 12%, which shows the effect of the hydrodynamic diameter of the nanoparticles. This work ends with the analysis of the concentration of nanoparticles and its importance in reliable results of DLS measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Scripta\",\"volume\":\"36 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Scripta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad664e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Scripta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad664e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
纳米粒子(NP)的尺寸是了解合成纳米结构特性的最重要、最基本的特征之一。最常见的表征程序与扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)和原子力显微镜(AFM)有关。遗憾的是,从实用角度来看,这些方法耗时长,而且需要昂贵的设备,这就限制了其在专业研究小组中的应用。动态光散射(DLS)作为一种简单、快速、可重复的纳米粒子尺寸测定方法,受到了广泛关注。然而,对 DLS 基本原理和数据解释的表述不足是与该技术相关的两个最重要的挑战。在这项工作中,我们试图提供 DLS 技术的基本原理、光学散射研究期间所获数据的基本数学处理方法,并提供配置非商业 DLS 设备的 MATLAB 代码。此外,还对通过脉冲激光烧蚀获得的银、金、硅和瓦纳米颗粒以及商用金纳米颗粒进行了分析。将粒度结果与 SEM 图像进行比较,以计算 DLS 测量误差的百分比。结果显示,Ag、Au 和 Si 纳米粒子的误差分别为 5%、3.8% 和 2.1%,这证明它们非常接近纳米粒子直径的真实值。同时,用同样的技术测定的 W 纳米粒子和商用 Au 纳米粒子的尺寸误差分别为 29% 和 12%,这表明纳米粒子的流体力学直径会产生影响。本研究最后分析了纳米粒子的浓度及其对 DLS 测量可靠结果的重要性。
DLS homemade setup: reviewing first and second-order coherence and autocorrelation concepts of a light source in the context of nanoparticle sizes synthesized by PLAL
The size of the nanoparticles (NP) is one of the most important and essential characteristics to know the properties of the synthesized nanostructures. The most common characterization procedures are related to Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electronic Microscopy (TEM), and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Unfortunately, from a practical point of view, they represent a time-consuming procedure and require expensive equipment, which limits its application to specialized research groups. Significant attention has been paid to Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) as a simple, fast, and reproducible method for sizing nanoparticles. However, inadequate representation of the fundamental principles of DLS and data interpretation represents two of the most important challenges related to this technique. In this work we try to provide the fundamental principles of the DLS technique, the fundamental mathematical treatment of data obtained during the optical scattering studies and provide the MATLAB code to configure non-commercial DLS equipment. Additionally, analyzes of nanoparticles obtained by pulsed laser ablation of Ag, Au, Si and W and commercial Au nanoparticles were carried out. The particle size results are compared with SEM images to calculate the percentage error of the DLS measurements. The results show an error of 5%, 3.8%, 2.1% for the Ag, Au and Si nanoparticles respectively, which proves to be an excellent approximation to the real values of nanoparticle diameter. Meanwhile, the error in size for W nanoparticles by the same technique and commercial Au nanoparticle is 29% and 12%, which shows the effect of the hydrodynamic diameter of the nanoparticles. This work ends with the analysis of the concentration of nanoparticles and its importance in reliable results of DLS measurements.