COVID-19 对澳大利亚北部地区结直肠癌的影响,以及与治疗距离有关的治疗变化:回顾性队列研究

Richard Maguire, Shaurya Jhamb, Tegan Lun, Fathima Shaba Isaam, Avjit Singh, Tejminder Singh, Kyle Crowley, James Lonie, Jai Hoff, Alexander David Croese, C. Mushaya
{"title":"COVID-19 对澳大利亚北部地区结直肠癌的影响,以及与治疗距离有关的治疗变化:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Richard Maguire, Shaurya Jhamb, Tegan Lun, Fathima Shaba Isaam, Avjit Singh, Tejminder Singh, Kyle Crowley, James Lonie, Jai Hoff, Alexander David Croese, C. Mushaya","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC). It was proposed in regional Northern Australia that the distance to services could further impact cancer outcomes, leading to delayed diagnosis. We compared the outcomes of patients prior and during the pandemic; with a focus on whether patients were presenting in the emergency setting with more advanced disease. The distance to treatment was also analysed to see if there was any impact to the management of patients with colorectal cancer.\n \n \n \n A retrospective analysis of 444 patients that underwent treatment for colorectal cancer over 2 time periods were examined. Time period 1 (prior to COVID-19); March 2017-July 2019 and time period 2 (during COVID-19); March 2020-July 2022. Only patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were included if they were primarily treated at a hospital in northern Australia; those with benign pathologies or recurrent disease were also excluded. Data was collected in terms of treatment and outcomes and compared between the two groups. A separate analysis of whether locality affected outcomes and referral times was also performed.\n \n \n \n In the time period prior to COVID-19 174 patients’ required invasive management, while in the second time period during COVID-19 there were 188 patients managed surgically or endoscopically. Of the patients managed prior to COVID-19 17/174 (9.8%) patients required emergency interventions, during COVID-19 this number increased to 37/188 (19.7%). This difference was deemed to be statistically significant (P\n =0.008). No substantial difference in cancer staging at presentation was found between the two groups. There was an increase in complication rate found during COVID-19 34.6% vs 25.5% prior to COVID-19 (P =0.046). During COVID-19 the median time between General Practitioner (primary care physician) referral and colonoscopy was actually lower than prior to covid 26.5 vs 36 days (P=0.047). When comparing local to distant patients we found locally based patients had lower rates of neoadjuvant treatment 18.9% vs 30.4% (P=0.018) and higher rates of open surgery 39.1% vs 26.5%, P\n =0.012. An increase in time between colonoscopy and outpatient department review (OPD) was seen in patients not from the local area 13 vs 18 days (P\n =0.006).\n \n \n \n We found during the COVID-19 pandemic a greater proportion of patients were presenting with colorectal cancer that required emergency intervention. This may be due to decreased presentations to general practitioners due to lockdown causing potential delays in diagnosis. We did not see more advanced disease in these patients presenting emergently, between the two groups. Further assessment of local patients’ vs patients from distant sites, showed difference in how patients were managed but similar outcomes. Our large catchment area with distance to treatment in Northern Australia may further impact the management of colorectal cancer in the future.\n","PeriodicalId":503882,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer in regional Northern Australia and changes to treatment related to distance to care: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Richard Maguire, Shaurya Jhamb, Tegan Lun, Fathima Shaba Isaam, Avjit Singh, Tejminder Singh, Kyle Crowley, James Lonie, Jai Hoff, Alexander David Croese, C. Mushaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC). It was proposed in regional Northern Australia that the distance to services could further impact cancer outcomes, leading to delayed diagnosis. We compared the outcomes of patients prior and during the pandemic; with a focus on whether patients were presenting in the emergency setting with more advanced disease. The distance to treatment was also analysed to see if there was any impact to the management of patients with colorectal cancer.\\n \\n \\n \\n A retrospective analysis of 444 patients that underwent treatment for colorectal cancer over 2 time periods were examined. Time period 1 (prior to COVID-19); March 2017-July 2019 and time period 2 (during COVID-19); March 2020-July 2022. Only patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were included if they were primarily treated at a hospital in northern Australia; those with benign pathologies or recurrent disease were also excluded. Data was collected in terms of treatment and outcomes and compared between the two groups. A separate analysis of whether locality affected outcomes and referral times was also performed.\\n \\n \\n \\n In the time period prior to COVID-19 174 patients’ required invasive management, while in the second time period during COVID-19 there were 188 patients managed surgically or endoscopically. Of the patients managed prior to COVID-19 17/174 (9.8%) patients required emergency interventions, during COVID-19 this number increased to 37/188 (19.7%). This difference was deemed to be statistically significant (P\\n =0.008). No substantial difference in cancer staging at presentation was found between the two groups. There was an increase in complication rate found during COVID-19 34.6% vs 25.5% prior to COVID-19 (P =0.046). During COVID-19 the median time between General Practitioner (primary care physician) referral and colonoscopy was actually lower than prior to covid 26.5 vs 36 days (P=0.047). When comparing local to distant patients we found locally based patients had lower rates of neoadjuvant treatment 18.9% vs 30.4% (P=0.018) and higher rates of open surgery 39.1% vs 26.5%, P\\n =0.012. An increase in time between colonoscopy and outpatient department review (OPD) was seen in patients not from the local area 13 vs 18 days (P\\n =0.006).\\n \\n \\n \\n We found during the COVID-19 pandemic a greater proportion of patients were presenting with colorectal cancer that required emergency intervention. This may be due to decreased presentations to general practitioners due to lockdown causing potential delays in diagnosis. We did not see more advanced disease in these patients presenting emergently, between the two groups. Further assessment of local patients’ vs patients from distant sites, showed difference in how patients were managed but similar outcomes. Our large catchment area with distance to treatment in Northern Australia may further impact the management of colorectal cancer in the future.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medicine & Surgery\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medicine & Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 的流行给大肠癌 (CRC) 的诊断和管理带来了挑战。有人提出,在澳大利亚北部地区,服务距离可能会进一步影响癌症治疗效果,导致诊断延迟。我们比较了大流行之前和大流行期间患者的治疗效果,重点关注患者是否在急诊就诊时病情已经发展到晚期。我们还对治疗距离进行了分析,以了解对结直肠癌患者的治疗是否有影响。 我们对两个时间段内接受治疗的 444 名结直肠癌患者进行了回顾性分析。时间段 1(COVID-19 之前);2017 年 3 月至 2019 年 7 月;时间段 2(COVID-19 期间);2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 7 月。只有主要在澳大利亚北部医院接受治疗的结直肠腺癌患者才被纳入研究范围;良性病变或复发性疾病患者也被排除在外。研究人员收集了两组患者的治疗和结果数据,并进行了比较。此外,还对地区是否影响治疗效果和转诊时间进行了单独分析。 在 COVID-19 之前的一段时间内,有 174 名患者需要接受侵入性治疗,而在 COVID-19 期间的第二个时间段内,有 188 名患者接受了手术或内窥镜治疗。在 COVID-19 之前接受治疗的患者中,17/174(9.8%)名患者需要紧急干预,而在 COVID-19 期间,这一数字增加到 37/188(19.7%)名。这一差异被认为具有统计学意义(P =0.008)。两组患者在就诊时的癌症分期没有实质性差异。在 COVID-19 期间,并发症发生率为 34.6%,而在 COVID-19 之前为 25.5%(P =0.046)。在 COVID-19 期间,全科医生(初级保健医生)转诊与结肠镜检查之间的中位时间实际上低于 COVID 之前的 26.5 天 vs 36 天(P=0.047)。在比较本地患者和外地患者时,我们发现本地患者接受新辅助治疗的比例较低,为 18.9% 对 30.4%(P=0.018),而接受开腹手术的比例较高,为 39.1% 对 26.5%,P=0.012。非本地患者接受结肠镜检查和门诊部复查(OPD)之间的时间分别为 13 天和 18 天(P=0.006)。 我们发现,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,有更大比例的结直肠癌患者需要进行紧急干预。这可能是由于封锁导致全科医生接诊量减少,从而可能延误诊断。在两组急诊患者中,我们没有发现更多的晚期患者。对本地患者和远方患者的进一步评估显示,患者的管理方式有所不同,但结果相似。我们的服务区面积大,距离澳大利亚北部的治疗地点较远,这可能会进一步影响未来结直肠癌的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer in regional Northern Australia and changes to treatment related to distance to care: A retrospective cohort study
The COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC). It was proposed in regional Northern Australia that the distance to services could further impact cancer outcomes, leading to delayed diagnosis. We compared the outcomes of patients prior and during the pandemic; with a focus on whether patients were presenting in the emergency setting with more advanced disease. The distance to treatment was also analysed to see if there was any impact to the management of patients with colorectal cancer. A retrospective analysis of 444 patients that underwent treatment for colorectal cancer over 2 time periods were examined. Time period 1 (prior to COVID-19); March 2017-July 2019 and time period 2 (during COVID-19); March 2020-July 2022. Only patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were included if they were primarily treated at a hospital in northern Australia; those with benign pathologies or recurrent disease were also excluded. Data was collected in terms of treatment and outcomes and compared between the two groups. A separate analysis of whether locality affected outcomes and referral times was also performed. In the time period prior to COVID-19 174 patients’ required invasive management, while in the second time period during COVID-19 there were 188 patients managed surgically or endoscopically. Of the patients managed prior to COVID-19 17/174 (9.8%) patients required emergency interventions, during COVID-19 this number increased to 37/188 (19.7%). This difference was deemed to be statistically significant (P =0.008). No substantial difference in cancer staging at presentation was found between the two groups. There was an increase in complication rate found during COVID-19 34.6% vs 25.5% prior to COVID-19 (P =0.046). During COVID-19 the median time between General Practitioner (primary care physician) referral and colonoscopy was actually lower than prior to covid 26.5 vs 36 days (P=0.047). When comparing local to distant patients we found locally based patients had lower rates of neoadjuvant treatment 18.9% vs 30.4% (P=0.018) and higher rates of open surgery 39.1% vs 26.5%, P =0.012. An increase in time between colonoscopy and outpatient department review (OPD) was seen in patients not from the local area 13 vs 18 days (P =0.006). We found during the COVID-19 pandemic a greater proportion of patients were presenting with colorectal cancer that required emergency intervention. This may be due to decreased presentations to general practitioners due to lockdown causing potential delays in diagnosis. We did not see more advanced disease in these patients presenting emergently, between the two groups. Further assessment of local patients’ vs patients from distant sites, showed difference in how patients were managed but similar outcomes. Our large catchment area with distance to treatment in Northern Australia may further impact the management of colorectal cancer in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信