意大利饮水机生命周期评估案例研究

Vincenzo Bianco, F. Cascetta, Sergio Nardini, R. E. Plomitallo
{"title":"意大利饮水机生命周期评估案例研究","authors":"Vincenzo Bianco, F. Cascetta, Sergio Nardini, R. E. Plomitallo","doi":"10.1177/0958305x241266537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this article is the comparison of global warming potential, estimated according to IPCC 2013 methodology, between bottled water and a drinking water dispenser made of pine wood. The functional unit is 1 L of water. Two cases are considered: in the first case is considered 1 L of refrigerated water supplied by a water dispenser, in the second case, it is also considered how users come back home with their water. The global warming potential for bottled water packed in polyethylene terephthalate is taken by literature, its average value is equal to 0.16 kg CO2 eq./L. In the first case, the water dispenser has a global warming potential value equal to 6.89 × 10−2 kg CO2 eq./L, the percentage difference between bottled water and water dispenser is about 43% in 100 years. In the end, a comparison of vehicles used by users to come back home is performed. The comparison shows that the use of bikes has a lower impact than cars.","PeriodicalId":505265,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Italian case study of life cycle assessment for a drinking water dispenser\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Bianco, F. Cascetta, Sergio Nardini, R. E. Plomitallo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0958305x241266537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this article is the comparison of global warming potential, estimated according to IPCC 2013 methodology, between bottled water and a drinking water dispenser made of pine wood. The functional unit is 1 L of water. Two cases are considered: in the first case is considered 1 L of refrigerated water supplied by a water dispenser, in the second case, it is also considered how users come back home with their water. The global warming potential for bottled water packed in polyethylene terephthalate is taken by literature, its average value is equal to 0.16 kg CO2 eq./L. In the first case, the water dispenser has a global warming potential value equal to 6.89 × 10−2 kg CO2 eq./L, the percentage difference between bottled water and water dispenser is about 43% in 100 years. In the end, a comparison of vehicles used by users to come back home is performed. The comparison shows that the use of bikes has a lower impact than cars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x241266537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x241266537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是比较瓶装水和松木饮水机的全球升温潜能值(根据 IPCC 2013 方法估算)。功能单位为 1 升水。本文考虑了两种情况:第一种情况是饮水机供应 1 升冷藏水,第二种情况是用户如何将水带回家。聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯瓶装水的全球变暖潜势是根据文献得出的,其平均值等于 0.16 kg CO2 eq./L。在第一种情况下,饮水机的全球变暖潜势值等于 6.89 × 10-2 kg CO2 eq./L,100 年内瓶装水和饮水机的百分比差异约为 43%。最后,对用户回家时使用的交通工具进行了比较。比较结果表明,使用自行车的影响低于汽车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Italian case study of life cycle assessment for a drinking water dispenser
The goal of this article is the comparison of global warming potential, estimated according to IPCC 2013 methodology, between bottled water and a drinking water dispenser made of pine wood. The functional unit is 1 L of water. Two cases are considered: in the first case is considered 1 L of refrigerated water supplied by a water dispenser, in the second case, it is also considered how users come back home with their water. The global warming potential for bottled water packed in polyethylene terephthalate is taken by literature, its average value is equal to 0.16 kg CO2 eq./L. In the first case, the water dispenser has a global warming potential value equal to 6.89 × 10−2 kg CO2 eq./L, the percentage difference between bottled water and water dispenser is about 43% in 100 years. In the end, a comparison of vehicles used by users to come back home is performed. The comparison shows that the use of bikes has a lower impact than cars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信