Archean期Central-Vozhma硫化物矿床(卡累利阿)硫化物形成过程中的大气和生物影响

S. Vysotskiy, T. Velivetskaya, A. Ignatiev, A. Aseeva
{"title":"Archean期Central-Vozhma硫化物矿床(卡累利阿)硫化物形成过程中的大气和生物影响","authors":"S. Vysotskiy, T. Velivetskaya, A. Ignatiev, A. Aseeva","doi":"10.18799/24131830/2024/7/4388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. The need of new knowledge about the early stages of the Earth. Sulfur isotope analysis of sulfide minerals is a powerful tool to understand the processes during the Archaean and Paleoproterozoic. Combined with other data, isotope geochemistry provides an insight into sulfur sources of sulfides from ancient sulfide volcanosedimentary deposits; geochemical factors affecting Archaean sulfide volcanosedimentary ore formation; adjust genetic models and determine the degree of influence of bacteria on the mineral formation. Aim. To identify the sources of sulfur during the formation of sulfide deposits via isotope analysis, and to evaluate bacteria affect mineral formation. Objects. They were obtained from the core of boreholes of Mesoarchaean volcanosedimentary sulfide Central-Vozhma deposit, being a part of the Sumozersko-Kenozersky greenstone belt of the Karelian craton. Methods. Mineralogical studies of rock and ore samples were carried out using optical microscopy; scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The ratios of four stable sulfur isotopes were analyzed in sulfide minerals of the deposit (33S/32S, 34S/32S, 36S/32S). Results. The results obtained demonstrated the polygenic source of sulfur in sulfides. The sulfides have both positive and negative Δ33S values, indicating the presence of atmospheric sulfur formed under UV photolysis during mineral formation. Sulfide minerals include the following components: Seawater sulfate sulfur of photolytic genesis showed a negative anomaly Δ33S (∼ –0.4‰). It was the source of authigenic pyrite. Sulfides crystallized as a result of biological sulfate reduction demonstrated a narrow range of δ34S values (–2.64‰˂0˂+4.27‰). Elemental sulfur of photolytic genesis mobilized from the host sedimentary rocks by hydrothermal fluids. This sulfur, with a positive Δ33S anomaly (up to +1.6‰) took part in the massive sulfide ores formation.","PeriodicalId":513946,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering","volume":"40 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atmosphere and biological impact during sulfide formation in the Archean Central-Vozhma sulfide deposit (Karelia)\",\"authors\":\"S. Vysotskiy, T. Velivetskaya, A. Ignatiev, A. Aseeva\",\"doi\":\"10.18799/24131830/2024/7/4388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance. The need of new knowledge about the early stages of the Earth. Sulfur isotope analysis of sulfide minerals is a powerful tool to understand the processes during the Archaean and Paleoproterozoic. Combined with other data, isotope geochemistry provides an insight into sulfur sources of sulfides from ancient sulfide volcanosedimentary deposits; geochemical factors affecting Archaean sulfide volcanosedimentary ore formation; adjust genetic models and determine the degree of influence of bacteria on the mineral formation. Aim. To identify the sources of sulfur during the formation of sulfide deposits via isotope analysis, and to evaluate bacteria affect mineral formation. Objects. They were obtained from the core of boreholes of Mesoarchaean volcanosedimentary sulfide Central-Vozhma deposit, being a part of the Sumozersko-Kenozersky greenstone belt of the Karelian craton. Methods. Mineralogical studies of rock and ore samples were carried out using optical microscopy; scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The ratios of four stable sulfur isotopes were analyzed in sulfide minerals of the deposit (33S/32S, 34S/32S, 36S/32S). Results. The results obtained demonstrated the polygenic source of sulfur in sulfides. The sulfides have both positive and negative Δ33S values, indicating the presence of atmospheric sulfur formed under UV photolysis during mineral formation. Sulfide minerals include the following components: Seawater sulfate sulfur of photolytic genesis showed a negative anomaly Δ33S (∼ –0.4‰). It was the source of authigenic pyrite. Sulfides crystallized as a result of biological sulfate reduction demonstrated a narrow range of δ34S values (–2.64‰˂0˂+4.27‰). Elemental sulfur of photolytic genesis mobilized from the host sedimentary rocks by hydrothermal fluids. This sulfur, with a positive Δ33S anomaly (up to +1.6‰) took part in the massive sulfide ores formation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering\",\"volume\":\"40 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2024/7/4388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2024/7/4388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相关性。需要了解地球早期的新知识。硫化物矿物的硫同位素分析是了解太古宙和古近代过程的有力工具。结合其他数据,同位素地球化学可深入了解古代硫化物火山沉积矿床硫化物的来源;影响太古宙硫化物火山沉积矿形成的地球化学因素;调整遗传模型并确定细菌对矿物形成的影响程度。目标通过同位素分析确定硫化物矿床形成过程中硫的来源,评估细菌对矿物形成的影响。研究对象从中生代火山沉积硫化物 Central-Vozhma 矿床的钻孔岩心中获得,该矿床是卡累利阿克拉通 Sumozersko-Kenozersky 绿岩带的一部分。研究方法使用光学显微镜、扫描电子显微镜和能量色散 X 射线光谱对岩石和矿石样本进行了矿物学研究。分析了矿床硫化物矿物中四种稳定硫同位素的比例(33S/32S、34S/32S、36S/32S)。结果。结果表明,硫化物中的硫具有多源性。硫化物的 Δ33S 值既有正值也有负值,这表明在矿物形成过程中存在紫外线光解形成的大气硫。硫化物矿物包括以下成分:光解生成的海水硫酸盐硫呈现负异常 Δ33S (∼ -0.4‰)。这是自生黄铁矿的来源。由于生物硫酸盐还原作用而结晶的硫化物的 Δ34S 值范围较窄(-2.64‰˂0˂+4.27‰)。热液从主沉积岩中移动的光解成因硫元素。这种硫元素具有正Δ33S异常(高达+1.6‰),参与了块状硫化矿的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atmosphere and biological impact during sulfide formation in the Archean Central-Vozhma sulfide deposit (Karelia)
Relevance. The need of new knowledge about the early stages of the Earth. Sulfur isotope analysis of sulfide minerals is a powerful tool to understand the processes during the Archaean and Paleoproterozoic. Combined with other data, isotope geochemistry provides an insight into sulfur sources of sulfides from ancient sulfide volcanosedimentary deposits; geochemical factors affecting Archaean sulfide volcanosedimentary ore formation; adjust genetic models and determine the degree of influence of bacteria on the mineral formation. Aim. To identify the sources of sulfur during the formation of sulfide deposits via isotope analysis, and to evaluate bacteria affect mineral formation. Objects. They were obtained from the core of boreholes of Mesoarchaean volcanosedimentary sulfide Central-Vozhma deposit, being a part of the Sumozersko-Kenozersky greenstone belt of the Karelian craton. Methods. Mineralogical studies of rock and ore samples were carried out using optical microscopy; scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The ratios of four stable sulfur isotopes were analyzed in sulfide minerals of the deposit (33S/32S, 34S/32S, 36S/32S). Results. The results obtained demonstrated the polygenic source of sulfur in sulfides. The sulfides have both positive and negative Δ33S values, indicating the presence of atmospheric sulfur formed under UV photolysis during mineral formation. Sulfide minerals include the following components: Seawater sulfate sulfur of photolytic genesis showed a negative anomaly Δ33S (∼ –0.4‰). It was the source of authigenic pyrite. Sulfides crystallized as a result of biological sulfate reduction demonstrated a narrow range of δ34S values (–2.64‰˂0˂+4.27‰). Elemental sulfur of photolytic genesis mobilized from the host sedimentary rocks by hydrothermal fluids. This sulfur, with a positive Δ33S anomaly (up to +1.6‰) took part in the massive sulfide ores formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信