基于离子色谱法和超高效液相色谱法的不同海藻多糖谱图比较

IF 1.3 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jing Fan, Donglin Gu, Weiyi Xv, Tingting Zhou, Anzhen Chen, Jingguang Lu, Ying Wang, Hongyu Jin, Feng Wei, ShuangCheng Ma
{"title":"基于离子色谱法和超高效液相色谱法的不同海藻多糖谱图比较","authors":"Jing Fan, Donglin Gu, Weiyi Xv, Tingting Zhou, Anzhen Chen, Jingguang Lu, Ying Wang, Hongyu Jin, Feng Wei, ShuangCheng Ma","doi":"10.1002/sscp.202400060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In traditional Chinese medicine research, seaweeds used for drug and health food development mainly refer to Sargassum pallidum (Turn.) C. Ag. (SP) and Sargassum fusiforme (Harv.) Setch. (SF). In the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, polysaccharides are the main quality control indicators. The total sugar content is determined by the anthrone–sulfuric acid method to evaluate the quality of seaweeds. However, this method cannot reflect the structural characteristics of seaweed polysaccharides and cannot distinguish among different seaweed varieties. Given this, to comprehensively evaluate the quality of different seaweeds, this study conducted a thorough analysis of the primary structure of polysaccharides in 11 batches of SF and 7 batches of SP. The neutral sugar content was determined by the anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetric method, weight average molecular weight (Mw) by high‐performance size exclusion chromatography coupled with multi‐angle laser light scattering and refractive index detector method, sulfate content by ion chromatography and monosaccharide composition by ultrahigh‐performance liquid chromatography method, while also using professional software for statistical and similarity analysis. The results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in neutral sugar content and Mw between S. fusiforme polysaccharides and S. pallidum polysaccharides, which can be used to distinguish SF and SP. The monosaccharide composition fingerprint was analyzed using chemometric methods, and it was found that fucose and glucose could serve as differential markers to distinguish SF and SP. This study further deepens the understanding of polysaccharides in seaweeds and more comprehensively evaluates the quality of different seaweeds.","PeriodicalId":21639,"journal":{"name":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Polysaccharide Profiles of Different Seaweeds Based on Ion Chromatography and Ultrahigh‐Performance Liquid Chromatography\",\"authors\":\"Jing Fan, Donglin Gu, Weiyi Xv, Tingting Zhou, Anzhen Chen, Jingguang Lu, Ying Wang, Hongyu Jin, Feng Wei, ShuangCheng Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sscp.202400060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In traditional Chinese medicine research, seaweeds used for drug and health food development mainly refer to Sargassum pallidum (Turn.) C. Ag. (SP) and Sargassum fusiforme (Harv.) Setch. (SF). In the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, polysaccharides are the main quality control indicators. The total sugar content is determined by the anthrone–sulfuric acid method to evaluate the quality of seaweeds. However, this method cannot reflect the structural characteristics of seaweed polysaccharides and cannot distinguish among different seaweed varieties. Given this, to comprehensively evaluate the quality of different seaweeds, this study conducted a thorough analysis of the primary structure of polysaccharides in 11 batches of SF and 7 batches of SP. The neutral sugar content was determined by the anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetric method, weight average molecular weight (Mw) by high‐performance size exclusion chromatography coupled with multi‐angle laser light scattering and refractive index detector method, sulfate content by ion chromatography and monosaccharide composition by ultrahigh‐performance liquid chromatography method, while also using professional software for statistical and similarity analysis. The results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in neutral sugar content and Mw between S. fusiforme polysaccharides and S. pallidum polysaccharides, which can be used to distinguish SF and SP. The monosaccharide composition fingerprint was analyzed using chemometric methods, and it was found that fucose and glucose could serve as differential markers to distinguish SF and SP. This study further deepens the understanding of polysaccharides in seaweeds and more comprehensively evaluates the quality of different seaweeds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202400060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202400060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在传统中药研究中,用于药物和保健食品开发的海藻主要是马尾藻(Sargassum pallidum (Turn.) C. Ag.)(SP)和马尾藻(Sargassum fusiforme (Harv.) Setch.(SF)。在《中国药典》中,多糖是主要的质量控制指标。采用蒽酮-硫酸法测定总糖含量,以评价海藻的质量。然而,这种方法无法反映海藻多糖的结构特征,也无法区分不同的海藻品种。有鉴于此,为全面评价不同海藻的质量,本研究对 11 批 SF 和 7 批 SP 的多糖一级结构进行了全面分析。采用蒽酮-硫酸比色法测定中性糖含量,采用高效尺寸排阻色谱-多角度激光光散射和折射率检测器法测定重量平均分子量(Mw),采用离子色谱法测定硫酸盐含量,采用超高效液相色谱法测定单糖组成,并使用专业软件进行统计和相似性分析。结果表明,扶桑多糖与苍白球多糖在中性糖含量和Mw上存在显著差异(p < 0.05),可用于区分SF和SP。利用化学计量学方法分析了单糖组成指纹,发现岩藻糖和葡萄糖可作为区分SF和SP的差异标记。该研究进一步加深了人们对海藻多糖的认识,更全面地评价了不同海藻的品质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Polysaccharide Profiles of Different Seaweeds Based on Ion Chromatography and Ultrahigh‐Performance Liquid Chromatography
In traditional Chinese medicine research, seaweeds used for drug and health food development mainly refer to Sargassum pallidum (Turn.) C. Ag. (SP) and Sargassum fusiforme (Harv.) Setch. (SF). In the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, polysaccharides are the main quality control indicators. The total sugar content is determined by the anthrone–sulfuric acid method to evaluate the quality of seaweeds. However, this method cannot reflect the structural characteristics of seaweed polysaccharides and cannot distinguish among different seaweed varieties. Given this, to comprehensively evaluate the quality of different seaweeds, this study conducted a thorough analysis of the primary structure of polysaccharides in 11 batches of SF and 7 batches of SP. The neutral sugar content was determined by the anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetric method, weight average molecular weight (Mw) by high‐performance size exclusion chromatography coupled with multi‐angle laser light scattering and refractive index detector method, sulfate content by ion chromatography and monosaccharide composition by ultrahigh‐performance liquid chromatography method, while also using professional software for statistical and similarity analysis. The results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in neutral sugar content and Mw between S. fusiforme polysaccharides and S. pallidum polysaccharides, which can be used to distinguish SF and SP. The monosaccharide composition fingerprint was analyzed using chemometric methods, and it was found that fucose and glucose could serve as differential markers to distinguish SF and SP. This study further deepens the understanding of polysaccharides in seaweeds and more comprehensively evaluates the quality of different seaweeds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信