关于用于波传播分析的自适应隐式-显式和显式-隐式时间积分程序的研究

Acoustics Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.3390/acoustics6030036
Delfim Soares, Isabelle de Souza Sales, Lucas Ruffo Pinto, W. Mansur
{"title":"关于用于波传播分析的自适应隐式-显式和显式-隐式时间积分程序的研究","authors":"Delfim Soares, Isabelle de Souza Sales, Lucas Ruffo Pinto, W. Mansur","doi":"10.3390/acoustics6030036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study delves into the effectiveness of two time integration techniques, namely the adaptive implicit–explicit (imp–exp) and explicit–explicit (exp–exp) methods, which stand as efficient formulations for tackling intricate systems characterized by multiple time scales. The imp–exp technique combines implicit and explicit procedures by employing implicit formulations for faster components and explicit calculations for slower ones, achieving high accuracy and computational efficiency. Conversely, the exp–exp method, a variation of explicit methods with sub-cycling, excels in handling locally stiff systems by employing smaller sub-steps to resolve rapid changes while maintaining stability. For both these approaches, numerical damping may be activated by adaptive time integration parameters, allowing numerical dissipation to be locally applied, if necessary, as a function of the considered discrete model and its computed responses, enabling a highly effective numerical dissipative algorithm. Furthermore, both these techniques stand as very simple and straightforward formulations as they rely solely on single-step displacement–velocity relations, describing truly self-starting procedures, and they stand as entirely automated methodologies, requiring no effort nor expertise from the user. This work provides comparative studies of the adaptive imp–exp and exp–exp approaches to assess their accuracy and efficiency across a wide range of scenarios, with emphasis on geophysical applications characterized by multiscale problems, aiming to establish under which circumstances one approach should be preferred over the other.","PeriodicalId":502373,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics","volume":"95 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on Adaptive Implicit–Explicit and Explicit–Explicit Time Integration Procedures for Wave Propagation Analyses\",\"authors\":\"Delfim Soares, Isabelle de Souza Sales, Lucas Ruffo Pinto, W. Mansur\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/acoustics6030036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study delves into the effectiveness of two time integration techniques, namely the adaptive implicit–explicit (imp–exp) and explicit–explicit (exp–exp) methods, which stand as efficient formulations for tackling intricate systems characterized by multiple time scales. The imp–exp technique combines implicit and explicit procedures by employing implicit formulations for faster components and explicit calculations for slower ones, achieving high accuracy and computational efficiency. Conversely, the exp–exp method, a variation of explicit methods with sub-cycling, excels in handling locally stiff systems by employing smaller sub-steps to resolve rapid changes while maintaining stability. For both these approaches, numerical damping may be activated by adaptive time integration parameters, allowing numerical dissipation to be locally applied, if necessary, as a function of the considered discrete model and its computed responses, enabling a highly effective numerical dissipative algorithm. Furthermore, both these techniques stand as very simple and straightforward formulations as they rely solely on single-step displacement–velocity relations, describing truly self-starting procedures, and they stand as entirely automated methodologies, requiring no effort nor expertise from the user. This work provides comparative studies of the adaptive imp–exp and exp–exp approaches to assess their accuracy and efficiency across a wide range of scenarios, with emphasis on geophysical applications characterized by multiscale problems, aiming to establish under which circumstances one approach should be preferred over the other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acoustics\",\"volume\":\"95 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acoustics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics6030036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics6030036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究深入探讨了两种时间积分技术的有效性,即自适应隐式-显式(imp-exp)和显式-显式(exp-exp)方法,这两种方法是处理以多时间尺度为特征的复杂系统的高效公式。imp-exp 技术结合了隐式和显式程序,对速度较快的部分采用隐式计算,对速度较慢的部分采用显式计算,从而实现了高精度和计算效率。相反,exp-exp 方法是显式方法与子循环的一种变体,通过采用较小的子步骤来解决快速变化,同时保持稳定,从而在处理局部僵化系统方面表现出色。对于这两种方法,数值阻尼可通过自适应时间积分参数激活,允许在必要时局部应用数值耗散,作为所考虑的离散模型及其计算响应的函数,从而实现高效的数值耗散算法。此外,这两种技术都是非常简单直接的公式,因为它们只依赖于单步位移-速度关系,描述了真正的自启动程序,而且它们是完全自动化的方法,用户无需付出任何努力,也无需专业知识。这项工作对自适应 imp-exp 和 exp-exp 方法进行了比较研究,以评估它们在各种情况下的准确性和效率,重点是以多尺度问题为特征的地球物理应用,旨在确定在哪些情况下一种方法应优于另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on Adaptive Implicit–Explicit and Explicit–Explicit Time Integration Procedures for Wave Propagation Analyses
This study delves into the effectiveness of two time integration techniques, namely the adaptive implicit–explicit (imp–exp) and explicit–explicit (exp–exp) methods, which stand as efficient formulations for tackling intricate systems characterized by multiple time scales. The imp–exp technique combines implicit and explicit procedures by employing implicit formulations for faster components and explicit calculations for slower ones, achieving high accuracy and computational efficiency. Conversely, the exp–exp method, a variation of explicit methods with sub-cycling, excels in handling locally stiff systems by employing smaller sub-steps to resolve rapid changes while maintaining stability. For both these approaches, numerical damping may be activated by adaptive time integration parameters, allowing numerical dissipation to be locally applied, if necessary, as a function of the considered discrete model and its computed responses, enabling a highly effective numerical dissipative algorithm. Furthermore, both these techniques stand as very simple and straightforward formulations as they rely solely on single-step displacement–velocity relations, describing truly self-starting procedures, and they stand as entirely automated methodologies, requiring no effort nor expertise from the user. This work provides comparative studies of the adaptive imp–exp and exp–exp approaches to assess their accuracy and efficiency across a wide range of scenarios, with emphasis on geophysical applications characterized by multiscale problems, aiming to establish under which circumstances one approach should be preferred over the other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信