国内监管机构的全球维度:为什么我们需要从网络角度看待政治合法性?

IF 1.1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Indira Latorre
{"title":"国内监管机构的全球维度:为什么我们需要从网络角度看待政治合法性?","authors":"Indira Latorre","doi":"10.1177/17550882241255314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many domestic regulatory agencies (DRAs) have intensified the use of international cooperation mechanisms, and their decisions increasingly exert a global impact. While the globally interactive nature of DRAs is generally accepted, the theoretical implications of this collaboration remain unexplored. I argue that DRAs have a global-domestic institutional dimension and outline the attributes of this aspect of their authority. Based on my analysis, I claim that the global-domestic dimension of DRAs produces changes in the manner in which they exercise their authority. I further try to ascertain how the political legitimacy of these agencies should be assessed. Finally, I argue that a networked perspective of political legitimacy is normatively sound in capturing and evaluating the global-domestic authority of DRAs.","PeriodicalId":44237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Political Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The global dimension of domestic regulatory agencies: Why do we need a networked perspective of political legitimacy?\",\"authors\":\"Indira Latorre\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17550882241255314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many domestic regulatory agencies (DRAs) have intensified the use of international cooperation mechanisms, and their decisions increasingly exert a global impact. While the globally interactive nature of DRAs is generally accepted, the theoretical implications of this collaboration remain unexplored. I argue that DRAs have a global-domestic institutional dimension and outline the attributes of this aspect of their authority. Based on my analysis, I claim that the global-domestic dimension of DRAs produces changes in the manner in which they exercise their authority. I further try to ascertain how the political legitimacy of these agencies should be assessed. Finally, I argue that a networked perspective of political legitimacy is normatively sound in capturing and evaluating the global-domestic authority of DRAs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Political Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Political Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882241255314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Political Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882241255314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多国内监管机构(DRAs)加强了对国际合作机制的利用,它们的决定越来越具有全球影响力。虽然人们普遍认为监管机构具有全球互动的性质,但这种合作的理论意义仍未得到探讨。我认为达尔富尔地区管理局具有全球-国内制度维度,并概述了其这方面权威的属性。基于我的分析,我认为地区权力机构的全球-国内维度会改变其行使权力的方式。我还试图确定应如何评估这些机构的政治合法性。最后,我认为政治合法性的网络化视角在捕捉和评估地区权力机构的全球-国内权威方面是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The global dimension of domestic regulatory agencies: Why do we need a networked perspective of political legitimacy?
Many domestic regulatory agencies (DRAs) have intensified the use of international cooperation mechanisms, and their decisions increasingly exert a global impact. While the globally interactive nature of DRAs is generally accepted, the theoretical implications of this collaboration remain unexplored. I argue that DRAs have a global-domestic institutional dimension and outline the attributes of this aspect of their authority. Based on my analysis, I claim that the global-domestic dimension of DRAs produces changes in the manner in which they exercise their authority. I further try to ascertain how the political legitimacy of these agencies should be assessed. Finally, I argue that a networked perspective of political legitimacy is normatively sound in capturing and evaluating the global-domestic authority of DRAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信