利用环境噪声记录和区域地震记录监测高层建筑的结构健康状况

Linpeng Qin, Yun Wang, Zhen Guo, Yi Zhang, Chunqi Liao, Chang Chen, Baojian Zhang
{"title":"利用环境噪声记录和区域地震记录监测高层建筑的结构健康状况","authors":"Linpeng Qin, Yun Wang, Zhen Guo, Yi Zhang, Chunqi Liao, Chang Chen, Baojian Zhang","doi":"10.1785/0220230368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Resonance frequency and seismic-wave velocity monitoring are both important for structural health monitoring (SHM). However, the limited number of vibration sensors or seismometers in most buildings necessitates the study of the sensitivity of monitoring indicators to ensure effective monitoring while reducing data acquisition costs and processing time. This study compares the changes in resonance frequency and seismic-wave velocity under ambient noise and a regional seismic event. Resonance frequency is calculated by power spectral density, whereas seismic-wave velocity is estimated using impulse response function and moving-window cross-spectrum methods. The results indicate that relative resonance frequency changes are more suitable for overall SHM due to its higher sensitivity and lower instrument requirements. Moreover, the time–frequency analysis method provides higher resolution results in resonance frequency during seismic events, a precision that seismic velocity methods cannot achieve.","PeriodicalId":508466,"journal":{"name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":"56 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Health Monitoring of a High-Rise Building Using Ambient Noise Recordings and a Regional Earthquake Record\",\"authors\":\"Linpeng Qin, Yun Wang, Zhen Guo, Yi Zhang, Chunqi Liao, Chang Chen, Baojian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0220230368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Resonance frequency and seismic-wave velocity monitoring are both important for structural health monitoring (SHM). However, the limited number of vibration sensors or seismometers in most buildings necessitates the study of the sensitivity of monitoring indicators to ensure effective monitoring while reducing data acquisition costs and processing time. This study compares the changes in resonance frequency and seismic-wave velocity under ambient noise and a regional seismic event. Resonance frequency is calculated by power spectral density, whereas seismic-wave velocity is estimated using impulse response function and moving-window cross-spectrum methods. The results indicate that relative resonance frequency changes are more suitable for overall SHM due to its higher sensitivity and lower instrument requirements. Moreover, the time–frequency analysis method provides higher resolution results in resonance frequency during seismic events, a precision that seismic velocity methods cannot achieve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seismological Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"56 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seismological Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共振频率和地震波速度监测对于结构健康监测(SHM)都很重要。然而,由于大多数建筑物中的振动传感器或地震仪数量有限,因此有必要对监测指标的灵敏度进行研究,以确保在降低数据采集成本和处理时间的同时进行有效监测。本研究比较了环境噪声和区域地震事件下共振频率和地震波速度的变化。共振频率用功率谱密度计算,地震波速度则用脉冲响应函数和移动窗交叉谱方法估算。结果表明,相对共振频率变化更适用于整体 SHM,因为其灵敏度更高,对仪器要求更低。此外,时频分析方法可提供地震事件期间共振频率的更高分辨率结果,这是地震波速度方法无法达到的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural Health Monitoring of a High-Rise Building Using Ambient Noise Recordings and a Regional Earthquake Record
Resonance frequency and seismic-wave velocity monitoring are both important for structural health monitoring (SHM). However, the limited number of vibration sensors or seismometers in most buildings necessitates the study of the sensitivity of monitoring indicators to ensure effective monitoring while reducing data acquisition costs and processing time. This study compares the changes in resonance frequency and seismic-wave velocity under ambient noise and a regional seismic event. Resonance frequency is calculated by power spectral density, whereas seismic-wave velocity is estimated using impulse response function and moving-window cross-spectrum methods. The results indicate that relative resonance frequency changes are more suitable for overall SHM due to its higher sensitivity and lower instrument requirements. Moreover, the time–frequency analysis method provides higher resolution results in resonance frequency during seismic events, a precision that seismic velocity methods cannot achieve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信