带着巨大假阳具的小个子女孩正是我们所需要的":鸡鸡不是枪》抗议活动中的性玩具政治

Lotta Kähkönen
{"title":"带着巨大假阳具的小个子女孩正是我们所需要的\":鸡鸡不是枪》抗议活动中的性玩具政治","authors":"Lotta Kähkönen","doi":"10.1177/13675494241264650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The University of Texas at Austin became the epicenter of the gun debate in fall 2016 as a student-led protest against the campus carry law grew into a movement known as Cocks Not Glocks. Utilizing humor and slogans, the activists adapted the dildo as a symbol of defiance. This article focuses on how the dildo as a protest tool gained agency. The subversive potential of the dildo was in its affective ambivalence, which was augmented in Texas, where the state law censors the public brandishing of sex toys. Through an analysis of media coverage and interviews with activists, students and faculty belonging to the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) community, the article demonstrates the cultural meaning-making and complex relationality of the dildo, an object shaped by competing meanings in relation to obscenity laws, sex-positivism and debates on gendered gun culture. Drawing from Sara Ahmed’s theorization of how objects may become sticky as an effect of substitutions, the article argues that the affective ambivalence of the dildo worked in the protest as a gesture that moved between sexual desires and political demands about gendered gun culture and public security in the United States.","PeriodicalId":502446,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The small girl with the huge dildo is what we needed’: The politics of sex toy in Cocks Not Glocks protest\",\"authors\":\"Lotta Kähkönen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13675494241264650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The University of Texas at Austin became the epicenter of the gun debate in fall 2016 as a student-led protest against the campus carry law grew into a movement known as Cocks Not Glocks. Utilizing humor and slogans, the activists adapted the dildo as a symbol of defiance. This article focuses on how the dildo as a protest tool gained agency. The subversive potential of the dildo was in its affective ambivalence, which was augmented in Texas, where the state law censors the public brandishing of sex toys. Through an analysis of media coverage and interviews with activists, students and faculty belonging to the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) community, the article demonstrates the cultural meaning-making and complex relationality of the dildo, an object shaped by competing meanings in relation to obscenity laws, sex-positivism and debates on gendered gun culture. Drawing from Sara Ahmed’s theorization of how objects may become sticky as an effect of substitutions, the article argues that the affective ambivalence of the dildo worked in the protest as a gesture that moved between sexual desires and political demands about gendered gun culture and public security in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241264650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241264650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016 年秋季,德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校成为枪支辩论的中心,一场由学生领导的反对校园携带枪支法的抗议活动发展成了一场名为 "公鸡不是格洛克 "的运动。活动人士利用幽默和口号,将假阳具改装成反抗的象征。本文重点探讨了假阳具作为一种抗议工具是如何获得影响力的。假阳具的颠覆潜力在于其情感矛盾性,而在得克萨斯州,这种矛盾性得到了加强,因为该州法律禁止公开展示性玩具。通过对媒体报道的分析,以及对德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校(UT Austin)社区的活动家、学生和教师的采访,文章展示了假阳具的文化意义生成和复杂的关系性,它是由与淫秽法律、性积极主义和性别枪支文化辩论相关的竞争意义所塑造的对象。文章借鉴萨拉-艾哈迈德(Sara Ahmed)关于物品如何因替代效应而变得具有粘性的理论,认为假阳具的情感矛盾性在抗议活动中发挥了作用,成为一种在性欲望和关于美国性别化枪支文化和公共安全的政治诉求之间游走的姿态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘The small girl with the huge dildo is what we needed’: The politics of sex toy in Cocks Not Glocks protest
The University of Texas at Austin became the epicenter of the gun debate in fall 2016 as a student-led protest against the campus carry law grew into a movement known as Cocks Not Glocks. Utilizing humor and slogans, the activists adapted the dildo as a symbol of defiance. This article focuses on how the dildo as a protest tool gained agency. The subversive potential of the dildo was in its affective ambivalence, which was augmented in Texas, where the state law censors the public brandishing of sex toys. Through an analysis of media coverage and interviews with activists, students and faculty belonging to the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) community, the article demonstrates the cultural meaning-making and complex relationality of the dildo, an object shaped by competing meanings in relation to obscenity laws, sex-positivism and debates on gendered gun culture. Drawing from Sara Ahmed’s theorization of how objects may become sticky as an effect of substitutions, the article argues that the affective ambivalence of the dildo worked in the protest as a gesture that moved between sexual desires and political demands about gendered gun culture and public security in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信