Achille Germain Feumo, Jean Francois Wounba, André Talla, Gervis Roméo Tueguem S
{"title":"应用于测量仪器不确定性测量最小化的优化控制技术","authors":"Achille Germain Feumo, Jean Francois Wounba, André Talla, Gervis Roméo Tueguem S","doi":"10.1177/00202940241259907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to develop an optimal control approach by numerical calculus to predict how to reduce the overall uncertainty of survey instruments unable to directly measure inaccessible points. To reach our goal, two approaches were used to attain the objective. The first was inspired by mathematical models related to three methods appropriately selected and contained in Zhuo’s work proposed in 2012. These were Remote Elevation Measurement (REM), Remote Elevation Dual Measurement (REDM), and Front-to-Back Measurement (FBM) methods whose uncertainties on the measurements of points were deduced using error propagation equations. Optimal control technique helps us to show that for the REM, the height h of the prism contributed more than 70% compared to the global uncertainty for ranges [Formula: see text] from the prism. For the REDM, when the distance between two consecutive stations increases, the weight of the contribution of the two zenith angles [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] tends to 50% each for [Formula: see text] close to [Formula: see text], which is to be avoided. For the FBM, the weight of the contribution during the front measurement process before is negligible. The second approach used the Swedish regulation of SIS-TS 21143:2009 which classified total stations according to types of uncertainty to compare the results given by the total station of class T3 unable to directly measure inaccessible points with the more sophisticated class T1 station with direct measurements. Thus, for small spans at the rear measurements [Formula: see text], the height [Formula: see text] of the front prism has the greatest relative contribution more than 90% for zenithal differences [Formula: see text]. This results of our analysis were convincing and provided designers with the data to minimize the overall uncertainties essential in the conception of total stations.","PeriodicalId":510299,"journal":{"name":"Measurement and Control","volume":"22 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal control technique applied to the minimization of uncertainty measurements in surveying instruments\",\"authors\":\"Achille Germain Feumo, Jean Francois Wounba, André Talla, Gervis Roméo Tueguem S\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00202940241259907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to develop an optimal control approach by numerical calculus to predict how to reduce the overall uncertainty of survey instruments unable to directly measure inaccessible points. To reach our goal, two approaches were used to attain the objective. The first was inspired by mathematical models related to three methods appropriately selected and contained in Zhuo’s work proposed in 2012. These were Remote Elevation Measurement (REM), Remote Elevation Dual Measurement (REDM), and Front-to-Back Measurement (FBM) methods whose uncertainties on the measurements of points were deduced using error propagation equations. Optimal control technique helps us to show that for the REM, the height h of the prism contributed more than 70% compared to the global uncertainty for ranges [Formula: see text] from the prism. For the REDM, when the distance between two consecutive stations increases, the weight of the contribution of the two zenith angles [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] tends to 50% each for [Formula: see text] close to [Formula: see text], which is to be avoided. For the FBM, the weight of the contribution during the front measurement process before is negligible. The second approach used the Swedish regulation of SIS-TS 21143:2009 which classified total stations according to types of uncertainty to compare the results given by the total station of class T3 unable to directly measure inaccessible points with the more sophisticated class T1 station with direct measurements. Thus, for small spans at the rear measurements [Formula: see text], the height [Formula: see text] of the front prism has the greatest relative contribution more than 90% for zenithal differences [Formula: see text]. This results of our analysis were convincing and provided designers with the data to minimize the overall uncertainties essential in the conception of total stations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement and Control\",\"volume\":\"22 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940241259907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940241259907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是通过数值微积分开发一种优化控制方法,以预测如何减少无法直接测量无法进入点的测量仪器的总体不确定性。为实现目标,我们采用了两种方法。第一种方法的灵感来自于与三种方法相关的数学模型,这三种方法被适当地选择并包含在卓文君于 2012 年提出的工作中。这三种方法分别是远程高程测量法(REM)、远程高程双测量法(REDM)和前后测量法(FBM),其点测量的不确定性是通过误差传播方程推导出来的。优化控制技术帮助我们表明,对于 REM,棱镜高度 h 对棱镜测距[公式:见正文]的全局不确定性的影响超过 70%。对于 REDM,当两个连续站点之间的距离增加时,两个天顶角[公式:见正文]和[公式:见正文]的贡献权重在[公式:见正文]接近[公式:见正文]时趋于各占 50%,这是需要避免的。对于 FBM 来说,前方测量过程中的贡献权重可以忽略不计。第二种方法采用瑞典 SIS-TS 21143:2009 法规,该法规根据不确定性类型对全站仪进行分类,将无法直接测量无法进入点的 T3 级全站仪的结果与可直接测量的更复杂的 T1 级全站仪的结果进行比较。因此,对于后方测量的小跨度[计算公式:见正文],前棱镜高度[计算公式:见正文]对天顶差[计算公式:见正文]的相对贡献最大,超过 90%。我们的分析结果令人信服,并为设计人员提供了数据,以最大限度地减少全站仪概念中必不可少的总体不确定性。
Optimal control technique applied to the minimization of uncertainty measurements in surveying instruments
The objective of this study was to develop an optimal control approach by numerical calculus to predict how to reduce the overall uncertainty of survey instruments unable to directly measure inaccessible points. To reach our goal, two approaches were used to attain the objective. The first was inspired by mathematical models related to three methods appropriately selected and contained in Zhuo’s work proposed in 2012. These were Remote Elevation Measurement (REM), Remote Elevation Dual Measurement (REDM), and Front-to-Back Measurement (FBM) methods whose uncertainties on the measurements of points were deduced using error propagation equations. Optimal control technique helps us to show that for the REM, the height h of the prism contributed more than 70% compared to the global uncertainty for ranges [Formula: see text] from the prism. For the REDM, when the distance between two consecutive stations increases, the weight of the contribution of the two zenith angles [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] tends to 50% each for [Formula: see text] close to [Formula: see text], which is to be avoided. For the FBM, the weight of the contribution during the front measurement process before is negligible. The second approach used the Swedish regulation of SIS-TS 21143:2009 which classified total stations according to types of uncertainty to compare the results given by the total station of class T3 unable to directly measure inaccessible points with the more sophisticated class T1 station with direct measurements. Thus, for small spans at the rear measurements [Formula: see text], the height [Formula: see text] of the front prism has the greatest relative contribution more than 90% for zenithal differences [Formula: see text]. This results of our analysis were convincing and provided designers with the data to minimize the overall uncertainties essential in the conception of total stations.