R. A. Mousset, Agnes Diemers, W. H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Jean-Pierre E.N. Pierie, A. Langers, Paul L.P. Brand
{"title":"内窥镜培训的进步与挑战:荷兰内窥镜培训人员的混合方法研究","authors":"R. A. Mousset, Agnes Diemers, W. H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Jean-Pierre E.N. Pierie, A. Langers, Paul L.P. Brand","doi":"10.1055/a-2370-5812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and study aims: Variation between trainers in providing the traditional gastrointestinal endoscopy training, in which residents learn endoscopy by doing under the supervision of endoscopy trainers, may cause differences in endoscopy competence between residents. In this study, we explored endoscopy trainers’ views on the current status and desired future best practices regarding endoscopy training. \nPatients and methods: This mixed-methods study comprised quantitative survey data collected from 158 endoscopy trainers working in the 26 gastroenterology teaching hospitals in the Netherlands and semi-structured interviews with 15 gastroenterology residency (associate) program directors (PDs). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interview results with thematic analysis. \nResults: There was considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between teaching hospitals in the structure of endoscopy supervision, the criteria used to determine the level of supervision, and the participation of trainers in endoscopy teaching courses. Interview participants agreed that an endoscopy training supervisor requires several teaching strategies, highlighting the importance of formal education in endoscopy teaching. Interview participants perceived self-regulated learning strategies as essential for residents to learn endoscopy effectively. The perceived main barriers to effective supervision were a lack of time and heavy workload. Participants expressed the desire for more standardization in endoscopy training programs between teaching hospitals. \nConclusions: Considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between gastroenterology teaching hospitals was identified. Formal education on endoscopy teaching, promotion of self-regulated learning, and standardization of endoscopy training programs and supervision practices have the potential to improve future endoscopy training.","PeriodicalId":508938,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"51 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances and challenges in endoscopy training: a mixed methods study among endoscopy trainers in the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Mousset, Agnes Diemers, W. H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Jean-Pierre E.N. Pierie, A. Langers, Paul L.P. Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2370-5812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and study aims: Variation between trainers in providing the traditional gastrointestinal endoscopy training, in which residents learn endoscopy by doing under the supervision of endoscopy trainers, may cause differences in endoscopy competence between residents. In this study, we explored endoscopy trainers’ views on the current status and desired future best practices regarding endoscopy training. \\nPatients and methods: This mixed-methods study comprised quantitative survey data collected from 158 endoscopy trainers working in the 26 gastroenterology teaching hospitals in the Netherlands and semi-structured interviews with 15 gastroenterology residency (associate) program directors (PDs). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interview results with thematic analysis. \\nResults: There was considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between teaching hospitals in the structure of endoscopy supervision, the criteria used to determine the level of supervision, and the participation of trainers in endoscopy teaching courses. Interview participants agreed that an endoscopy training supervisor requires several teaching strategies, highlighting the importance of formal education in endoscopy teaching. Interview participants perceived self-regulated learning strategies as essential for residents to learn endoscopy effectively. The perceived main barriers to effective supervision were a lack of time and heavy workload. Participants expressed the desire for more standardization in endoscopy training programs between teaching hospitals. \\nConclusions: Considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between gastroenterology teaching hospitals was identified. Formal education on endoscopy teaching, promotion of self-regulated learning, and standardization of endoscopy training programs and supervision practices have the potential to improve future endoscopy training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"51 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2370-5812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2370-5812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advances and challenges in endoscopy training: a mixed methods study among endoscopy trainers in the Netherlands
Background and study aims: Variation between trainers in providing the traditional gastrointestinal endoscopy training, in which residents learn endoscopy by doing under the supervision of endoscopy trainers, may cause differences in endoscopy competence between residents. In this study, we explored endoscopy trainers’ views on the current status and desired future best practices regarding endoscopy training.
Patients and methods: This mixed-methods study comprised quantitative survey data collected from 158 endoscopy trainers working in the 26 gastroenterology teaching hospitals in the Netherlands and semi-structured interviews with 15 gastroenterology residency (associate) program directors (PDs). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interview results with thematic analysis.
Results: There was considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between teaching hospitals in the structure of endoscopy supervision, the criteria used to determine the level of supervision, and the participation of trainers in endoscopy teaching courses. Interview participants agreed that an endoscopy training supervisor requires several teaching strategies, highlighting the importance of formal education in endoscopy teaching. Interview participants perceived self-regulated learning strategies as essential for residents to learn endoscopy effectively. The perceived main barriers to effective supervision were a lack of time and heavy workload. Participants expressed the desire for more standardization in endoscopy training programs between teaching hospitals.
Conclusions: Considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between gastroenterology teaching hospitals was identified. Formal education on endoscopy teaching, promotion of self-regulated learning, and standardization of endoscopy training programs and supervision practices have the potential to improve future endoscopy training.