内窥镜培训的进步与挑战:荷兰内窥镜培训人员的混合方法研究

R. A. Mousset, Agnes Diemers, W. H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Jean-Pierre E.N. Pierie, A. Langers, Paul L.P. Brand
{"title":"内窥镜培训的进步与挑战:荷兰内窥镜培训人员的混合方法研究","authors":"R. A. Mousset, Agnes Diemers, W. H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Jean-Pierre E.N. Pierie, A. Langers, Paul L.P. Brand","doi":"10.1055/a-2370-5812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and study aims: Variation between trainers in providing the traditional gastrointestinal endoscopy training, in which residents learn endoscopy by doing under the supervision of endoscopy trainers, may cause differences in endoscopy competence between residents. In this study, we explored endoscopy trainers’ views on the current status and desired future best practices regarding endoscopy training. \nPatients and methods: This mixed-methods study comprised quantitative survey data collected from 158 endoscopy trainers working in the 26 gastroenterology teaching hospitals in the Netherlands and semi-structured interviews with 15 gastroenterology residency (associate) program directors (PDs). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interview results with thematic analysis. \nResults: There was considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between teaching hospitals in the structure of endoscopy supervision, the criteria used to determine the level of supervision, and the participation of trainers in endoscopy teaching courses. Interview participants agreed that an endoscopy training supervisor requires several teaching strategies, highlighting the importance of formal education in endoscopy teaching. Interview participants perceived self-regulated learning strategies as essential for residents to learn endoscopy effectively. The perceived main barriers to effective supervision were a lack of time and heavy workload. Participants expressed the desire for more standardization in endoscopy training programs between teaching hospitals. \nConclusions: Considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between gastroenterology teaching hospitals was identified. Formal education on endoscopy teaching, promotion of self-regulated learning, and standardization of endoscopy training programs and supervision practices have the potential to improve future endoscopy training.","PeriodicalId":508938,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"51 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances and challenges in endoscopy training: a mixed methods study among endoscopy trainers in the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Mousset, Agnes Diemers, W. H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Jean-Pierre E.N. Pierie, A. Langers, Paul L.P. Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2370-5812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and study aims: Variation between trainers in providing the traditional gastrointestinal endoscopy training, in which residents learn endoscopy by doing under the supervision of endoscopy trainers, may cause differences in endoscopy competence between residents. In this study, we explored endoscopy trainers’ views on the current status and desired future best practices regarding endoscopy training. \\nPatients and methods: This mixed-methods study comprised quantitative survey data collected from 158 endoscopy trainers working in the 26 gastroenterology teaching hospitals in the Netherlands and semi-structured interviews with 15 gastroenterology residency (associate) program directors (PDs). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interview results with thematic analysis. \\nResults: There was considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between teaching hospitals in the structure of endoscopy supervision, the criteria used to determine the level of supervision, and the participation of trainers in endoscopy teaching courses. Interview participants agreed that an endoscopy training supervisor requires several teaching strategies, highlighting the importance of formal education in endoscopy teaching. Interview participants perceived self-regulated learning strategies as essential for residents to learn endoscopy effectively. The perceived main barriers to effective supervision were a lack of time and heavy workload. Participants expressed the desire for more standardization in endoscopy training programs between teaching hospitals. \\nConclusions: Considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between gastroenterology teaching hospitals was identified. Formal education on endoscopy teaching, promotion of self-regulated learning, and standardization of endoscopy training programs and supervision practices have the potential to improve future endoscopy training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"51 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2370-5812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2370-5812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:在传统的消化内镜培训中,住院医师在内镜培训师的指导下通过实践学习内镜检查,不同培训师在提供这种培训时存在差异,这可能会导致住院医师在内镜检查能力上的差异。在这项研究中,我们探讨了内镜培训师对内镜培训现状和未来最佳实践的看法。患者和方法:这项混合方法研究包括从荷兰26家消化内科教学医院的158名内镜培训师处收集的定量调查数据,以及对15名消化内科住院医师(副)项目主任(PD)进行的半结构化访谈。调查数据采用描述性统计,访谈结果采用主题分析。结果:各教学医院的内镜培训实践在内镜督导结构、确定督导水平的标准以及培训师参与内镜教学课程等方面存在很大差异。访谈参与者一致认为,内镜培训督导需要多种教学策略,这凸显了正规教育在内镜教学中的重要性。访谈参与者认为,自我调节的学习策略对住院医师有效学习内镜至关重要。有效督导的主要障碍是缺乏时间和工作量繁重。参与者表示希望教学医院之间的内镜培训项目更加标准化。结论:消化内科教学医院之间的内镜培训实践存在很大差异。内镜教学方面的正规教育、自我调节学习的推广以及内镜培训项目和督导实践的标准化都有可能改善未来的内镜培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advances and challenges in endoscopy training: a mixed methods study among endoscopy trainers in the Netherlands
Background and study aims: Variation between trainers in providing the traditional gastrointestinal endoscopy training, in which residents learn endoscopy by doing under the supervision of endoscopy trainers, may cause differences in endoscopy competence between residents. In this study, we explored endoscopy trainers’ views on the current status and desired future best practices regarding endoscopy training. Patients and methods: This mixed-methods study comprised quantitative survey data collected from 158 endoscopy trainers working in the 26 gastroenterology teaching hospitals in the Netherlands and semi-structured interviews with 15 gastroenterology residency (associate) program directors (PDs). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interview results with thematic analysis. Results: There was considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between teaching hospitals in the structure of endoscopy supervision, the criteria used to determine the level of supervision, and the participation of trainers in endoscopy teaching courses. Interview participants agreed that an endoscopy training supervisor requires several teaching strategies, highlighting the importance of formal education in endoscopy teaching. Interview participants perceived self-regulated learning strategies as essential for residents to learn endoscopy effectively. The perceived main barriers to effective supervision were a lack of time and heavy workload. Participants expressed the desire for more standardization in endoscopy training programs between teaching hospitals. Conclusions: Considerable variability in endoscopy training practices between gastroenterology teaching hospitals was identified. Formal education on endoscopy teaching, promotion of self-regulated learning, and standardization of endoscopy training programs and supervision practices have the potential to improve future endoscopy training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信