{"title":"堤坝破裂参数模型的评估与比较","authors":"Getachew Bereta Geremew","doi":"10.4028/p-z42x2n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliable approximations for breach parameters using a parametric model due to embankment dam failure are very significant factors in dam safety and mitigation measures. Therefore, utilizing information on historically unsuccessful embankment dams, several empirical models have been formulated by different researchers. There is still no universal method for calculating the occurrence of dam breaches. The main objective of this research is to evaluate and compare the selected parametric dam breach models that are available in the literature. Four models (Xu et al., Vescher et al., Froehlich, and USB Reclamation) were chosen to forecast the breach event's parameters and peak discharges. Historically, 59 failed embankment dams’ data in various countries around the world were used. In order to assess and compare the breach models and recommend the best-performing model for predicting the peak discharge, breach width, and failure time, ten (10) statistical quantitative indicators were used. The breach model developed by Xu et al. has good performance. Finally, to show the impacts of erodibility, validation, and sensitivity of the selected model, it was checked using eight dams’ data. During the validation, the calculated and observed results were in agreement. Sensitivity revealed that large fluctuations in the breach parameter and peak discharge were seen when the erodibility coefficient increased or decreased.","PeriodicalId":7184,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Forum","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Comparison of Breach Parametric Model for Embankment Dams\",\"authors\":\"Getachew Bereta Geremew\",\"doi\":\"10.4028/p-z42x2n\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reliable approximations for breach parameters using a parametric model due to embankment dam failure are very significant factors in dam safety and mitigation measures. Therefore, utilizing information on historically unsuccessful embankment dams, several empirical models have been formulated by different researchers. There is still no universal method for calculating the occurrence of dam breaches. The main objective of this research is to evaluate and compare the selected parametric dam breach models that are available in the literature. Four models (Xu et al., Vescher et al., Froehlich, and USB Reclamation) were chosen to forecast the breach event's parameters and peak discharges. Historically, 59 failed embankment dams’ data in various countries around the world were used. In order to assess and compare the breach models and recommend the best-performing model for predicting the peak discharge, breach width, and failure time, ten (10) statistical quantitative indicators were used. The breach model developed by Xu et al. has good performance. Finally, to show the impacts of erodibility, validation, and sensitivity of the selected model, it was checked using eight dams’ data. During the validation, the calculated and observed results were in agreement. Sensitivity revealed that large fluctuations in the breach parameter and peak discharge were seen when the erodibility coefficient increased or decreased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Engineering Forum\",\"volume\":\"9 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Engineering Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-z42x2n\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-z42x2n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
利用参数模型对堤坝溃决引起的溃口参数进行可靠的近似计算,是大坝安全和减灾措施中非常重要的因素。因此,不同的研究人员利用历史上未成功溃坝的信息,制定了若干经验模型。目前还没有一种通用的方法来计算溃坝的发生率。本研究的主要目的是评估和比较文献中选定的参数溃坝模型。我们选择了四个模型(Xu 等人、Vescher 等人、Froehlich 和 USB Reclamation)来预测溃坝事件的参数和峰值排水量。使用了世界各国 59 座溃坝的历史数据。为了评估和比较溃坝模型,并推荐预测峰值排水量、溃坝宽度和溃坝时间的最佳模型,使用了十(10)个统计量化指标。Xu 等人开发的决口模型性能良好。最后,为了说明所选模型的可侵蚀性、验证性和灵敏度的影响,使用八个大坝的数据对其进行了检验。在验证过程中,计算结果与观测结果一致。灵敏度表明,当侵蚀系数增大或减小时,溃口参数和峰值排水量会出现较大波动。
Evaluation and Comparison of Breach Parametric Model for Embankment Dams
Reliable approximations for breach parameters using a parametric model due to embankment dam failure are very significant factors in dam safety and mitigation measures. Therefore, utilizing information on historically unsuccessful embankment dams, several empirical models have been formulated by different researchers. There is still no universal method for calculating the occurrence of dam breaches. The main objective of this research is to evaluate and compare the selected parametric dam breach models that are available in the literature. Four models (Xu et al., Vescher et al., Froehlich, and USB Reclamation) were chosen to forecast the breach event's parameters and peak discharges. Historically, 59 failed embankment dams’ data in various countries around the world were used. In order to assess and compare the breach models and recommend the best-performing model for predicting the peak discharge, breach width, and failure time, ten (10) statistical quantitative indicators were used. The breach model developed by Xu et al. has good performance. Finally, to show the impacts of erodibility, validation, and sensitivity of the selected model, it was checked using eight dams’ data. During the validation, the calculated and observed results were in agreement. Sensitivity revealed that large fluctuations in the breach parameter and peak discharge were seen when the erodibility coefficient increased or decreased.