1850 年和 1996 年地震对克罗地亚斯通市建筑物破坏情况的比较研究

M. Herak, D. Herak
{"title":"1850 年和 1996 年地震对克罗地亚斯通市建筑物破坏情况的比较研究","authors":"M. Herak, D. Herak","doi":"10.1785/0220240248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The small medieval city of Ston in southern Dalmatia (Croatia) has been hit by several strong earthquakes since mid-nineteenth century. The two most important are the ones from the years of 1850 and 1996. Although various aspects of the 1996 event have been well studied so far, the earthquake of 1850 has only recently been macroseismically analyzed. It turned out that the macroseismic epicenters, focal depths, and the epicentral intensities of the two events are virtually the same. As the categories of damage to buildings in Ston caused by the 1996 event were available from previous studies, we here combine details on damage and property ownership from reports in 1850 with the cadastral records from 1837. This allowed us to geolocate most of the damaged houses and thus directly compare the spatial distribution of damage from the two earthquakes. Although the building identification was not straight-forward and unambiguous due to unknown history of each building during the 13 yr between the cadastral survey and the earthquake, the overall damage distributions of both events are found to be similar. They both show the largest damage confined to the plain terrain below the Bartolomija hill characterized by a sedimentary cover 10–30 m thick and expected ground-motion amplification by factors of 3–5. Minimal damage for both events is observed on the hillslopes of Bartolomija in the northern part of the city, where the bedrock is shallow or outcropping. To our knowledge, this observation of the shaking effects for two strong similar earthquakes in a city that has changed little in the 146 yr between them is the only one of its kind in Croatia. It confirms consistency of spatial distribution of earthquake ground-motion amplification for comparable input earthquake motion.","PeriodicalId":508466,"journal":{"name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Building Damage in Ston, Croatia, Caused by the Earthquakes of 1850 and 1996\",\"authors\":\"M. Herak, D. Herak\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0220240248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The small medieval city of Ston in southern Dalmatia (Croatia) has been hit by several strong earthquakes since mid-nineteenth century. The two most important are the ones from the years of 1850 and 1996. Although various aspects of the 1996 event have been well studied so far, the earthquake of 1850 has only recently been macroseismically analyzed. It turned out that the macroseismic epicenters, focal depths, and the epicentral intensities of the two events are virtually the same. As the categories of damage to buildings in Ston caused by the 1996 event were available from previous studies, we here combine details on damage and property ownership from reports in 1850 with the cadastral records from 1837. This allowed us to geolocate most of the damaged houses and thus directly compare the spatial distribution of damage from the two earthquakes. Although the building identification was not straight-forward and unambiguous due to unknown history of each building during the 13 yr between the cadastral survey and the earthquake, the overall damage distributions of both events are found to be similar. They both show the largest damage confined to the plain terrain below the Bartolomija hill characterized by a sedimentary cover 10–30 m thick and expected ground-motion amplification by factors of 3–5. Minimal damage for both events is observed on the hillslopes of Bartolomija in the northern part of the city, where the bedrock is shallow or outcropping. To our knowledge, this observation of the shaking effects for two strong similar earthquakes in a city that has changed little in the 146 yr between them is the only one of its kind in Croatia. It confirms consistency of spatial distribution of earthquake ground-motion amplification for comparable input earthquake motion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seismological Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"8 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seismological Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自十九世纪中叶以来,位于达尔马提亚(克罗地亚)南部的中世纪小城斯通曾多次遭受强烈地震袭击。最重要的两次地震分别发生在 1850 年和 1996 年。虽然 1996 年地震的各个方面迄今已得到深入研究,但对 1850 年地震的宏观地震学分析最近才开始。结果发现,两次地震的宏观震中、震源深度和震中烈度几乎相同。由于之前的研究已经提供了 1996 年地震对斯通地区建筑物造成的损坏类别,我们在此将 1850 年报告中有关损坏和财产所有权的详细信息与 1837 年的地籍记录结合起来。这使我们能够对大部分受损房屋进行地理定位,从而直接比较两次地震中受损房屋的空间分布情况。虽然由于地籍调查和地震之间的 13 年间每栋建筑物的历史不详,因此建筑物的识别并不直接和明确,但我们发现两次地震的总体破坏分布情况相似。它们都显示最大的破坏局限于 Bartolomija 山下的平原地形,其特点是沉积覆盖层厚 10-30 米,预计地动放大系数为 3-5 倍。在该市北部的巴托洛米亚山坡上,基岩较浅或出露,因此两次地震造成的破坏都很小。据我们所知,在一个相隔 146 年变化不大的城市里,对两次类似强震的摇晃效应进行观测,这在克罗地亚是唯一的一次。它证实了在输入地震运动相当的情况下,地震地动放大的空间分布具有一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Building Damage in Ston, Croatia, Caused by the Earthquakes of 1850 and 1996
The small medieval city of Ston in southern Dalmatia (Croatia) has been hit by several strong earthquakes since mid-nineteenth century. The two most important are the ones from the years of 1850 and 1996. Although various aspects of the 1996 event have been well studied so far, the earthquake of 1850 has only recently been macroseismically analyzed. It turned out that the macroseismic epicenters, focal depths, and the epicentral intensities of the two events are virtually the same. As the categories of damage to buildings in Ston caused by the 1996 event were available from previous studies, we here combine details on damage and property ownership from reports in 1850 with the cadastral records from 1837. This allowed us to geolocate most of the damaged houses and thus directly compare the spatial distribution of damage from the two earthquakes. Although the building identification was not straight-forward and unambiguous due to unknown history of each building during the 13 yr between the cadastral survey and the earthquake, the overall damage distributions of both events are found to be similar. They both show the largest damage confined to the plain terrain below the Bartolomija hill characterized by a sedimentary cover 10–30 m thick and expected ground-motion amplification by factors of 3–5. Minimal damage for both events is observed on the hillslopes of Bartolomija in the northern part of the city, where the bedrock is shallow or outcropping. To our knowledge, this observation of the shaking effects for two strong similar earthquakes in a city that has changed little in the 146 yr between them is the only one of its kind in Croatia. It confirms consistency of spatial distribution of earthquake ground-motion amplification for comparable input earthquake motion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信