GPT 破译联邦言论:量化鹰派和鸽派的不同意见

Denis Peskoff, Adam Visokay, Sander Schulhoff, Benjamin Wachspress, Alan Blinder, Brandon Stewart
{"title":"GPT 破译联邦言论:量化鹰派和鸽派的不同意见","authors":"Denis Peskoff, Adam Visokay, Sander Schulhoff, Benjamin Wachspress, Alan Blinder, Brandon Stewart","doi":"10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Markets and policymakers around the world hang on the consequential monetary policy decisions made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Publicly available textual documentation of their meetings provides insight into members' attitudes about the economy. We use GPT-4 to quantify dissent among members on the topic of inflation. We find that transcripts and minutes reflect the diversity of member views about the macroeconomic outlook in a way that is lost or omitted from the public statements. In fact, diverging opinions that shed light upon the committee's\"true\"attitudes are almost entirely omitted from the final statements. Hence, we argue that forecasting FOMC sentiment based solely on statements will not sufficiently reflect dissent among the hawks and doves.","PeriodicalId":505350,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing","volume":"13 3","pages":"6529-6539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GPT Deciphering Fedspeak: Quantifying Dissent Among Hawks and Doves\",\"authors\":\"Denis Peskoff, Adam Visokay, Sander Schulhoff, Benjamin Wachspress, Alan Blinder, Brandon Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Markets and policymakers around the world hang on the consequential monetary policy decisions made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Publicly available textual documentation of their meetings provides insight into members' attitudes about the economy. We use GPT-4 to quantify dissent among members on the topic of inflation. We find that transcripts and minutes reflect the diversity of member views about the macroeconomic outlook in a way that is lost or omitted from the public statements. In fact, diverging opinions that shed light upon the committee's\\\"true\\\"attitudes are almost entirely omitted from the final statements. Hence, we argue that forecasting FOMC sentiment based solely on statements will not sufficiently reflect dissent among the hawks and doves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"6529-6539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界的市场和政策制定者都在关注联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)做出的重要货币政策决定。通过公开的会议文本文件,我们可以深入了解委员们对经济的态度。我们使用 GPT-4 来量化委员们在通胀问题上的不同意见。我们发现,文字记录和会议纪要反映了委员们对宏观经济前景的不同看法,而这些看法在公开声明中被忽略或遗漏了。事实上,能够反映委员会 "真实 "态度的不同意见在最终声明中几乎完全被忽略。因此,我们认为,仅凭声明来预测 FOMC 的情绪并不能充分反映鹰派和鸽派之间的分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GPT Deciphering Fedspeak: Quantifying Dissent Among Hawks and Doves
Markets and policymakers around the world hang on the consequential monetary policy decisions made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Publicly available textual documentation of their meetings provides insight into members' attitudes about the economy. We use GPT-4 to quantify dissent among members on the topic of inflation. We find that transcripts and minutes reflect the diversity of member views about the macroeconomic outlook in a way that is lost or omitted from the public statements. In fact, diverging opinions that shed light upon the committee's"true"attitudes are almost entirely omitted from the final statements. Hence, we argue that forecasting FOMC sentiment based solely on statements will not sufficiently reflect dissent among the hawks and doves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信