电燃料作为航运燃料的技术经济分析

F. Tassew, Hendrik Brinks, H. A. Tvete
{"title":"电燃料作为航运燃料的技术经济分析","authors":"F. Tassew, Hendrik Brinks, H. A. Tvete","doi":"10.1115/1.4066064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, we aim to evaluate the technical and economic requirements of electrofuel production through Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using green hydrogen and CO2. We find that a plant with a 1 000-barrel per day capacity necessitates 60 tH2 and 424 tCO2 daily, achieving a 36% hydrogen-to-electrofuel conversion rate. The initial capital expenditure (CAPEX) is projected at 295 million USD, with an additional 139 million USD for electrolyzer replacement. The hydrogen production unit accounts for 61% of the CAPEX, followed by the direct air capture unit at 22%. The annual operating expense (OPEX) is estimated at 49.3 million USD, with hydrogen production and direct air capture constituting 58% and 25% of this expense, respectively, largely due to substantial electricity requirements. The synthesis and refining units comprise 17% of the OPEX. The levelized cost of electrofuel is calculated at 1881 USD/t, which is 2.5 times the cost of marine gas oil and 3.8 times that of very low sulfur fuel oil. However, electrofuels emission factor is found to be significantly lower, nearly 14 times less carbon-intensive than traditional fuels. We conclude that electrofuels cost competitiveness with fossil fuels depends on favorable conditions such as low electricity costs, low discount rates, and high carbon prices. While the EU's ETS inclusion for maritime transport will lessen the cost disparity, it is unlikely to make electrofuels cost-competitive given the current carbon prices.","PeriodicalId":509714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic analysis of electrofuel as a shipping fuel\",\"authors\":\"F. Tassew, Hendrik Brinks, H. A. Tvete\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4066064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this study, we aim to evaluate the technical and economic requirements of electrofuel production through Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using green hydrogen and CO2. We find that a plant with a 1 000-barrel per day capacity necessitates 60 tH2 and 424 tCO2 daily, achieving a 36% hydrogen-to-electrofuel conversion rate. The initial capital expenditure (CAPEX) is projected at 295 million USD, with an additional 139 million USD for electrolyzer replacement. The hydrogen production unit accounts for 61% of the CAPEX, followed by the direct air capture unit at 22%. The annual operating expense (OPEX) is estimated at 49.3 million USD, with hydrogen production and direct air capture constituting 58% and 25% of this expense, respectively, largely due to substantial electricity requirements. The synthesis and refining units comprise 17% of the OPEX. The levelized cost of electrofuel is calculated at 1881 USD/t, which is 2.5 times the cost of marine gas oil and 3.8 times that of very low sulfur fuel oil. However, electrofuels emission factor is found to be significantly lower, nearly 14 times less carbon-intensive than traditional fuels. We conclude that electrofuels cost competitiveness with fossil fuels depends on favorable conditions such as low electricity costs, low discount rates, and high carbon prices. While the EU's ETS inclusion for maritime transport will lessen the cost disparity, it is unlikely to make electrofuels cost-competitive given the current carbon prices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们旨在评估利用绿色氢气和二氧化碳通过费托合成生产电燃料的技术和经济要求。我们发现,一个日产量为 1000 桶的工厂每天需要 60 吨氢气和 424 吨二氧化碳,实现 36% 的氢气-电燃料转化率。预计初始资本支出(CAPEX)为 2.95 亿美元,另外 1.39 亿美元用于更换电解槽。制氢装置占资本支出的 61%,其次是直接空气捕获装置,占 22%。年运营费用(OPEX)预计为 4930 万美元,其中制氢和直接空气捕集分别占 58% 和 25%,这主要是由于大量的电力需求。合成和精炼装置占运营费用的 17%。据计算,电燃料的平准化成本为 1881 美元/吨,是船用燃气油成本的 2.5 倍,是极低硫燃油成本的 3.8 倍。然而,我们发现电燃料的排放系数明显较低,碳密集度比传统燃料低近 14 倍。我们的结论是,与化石燃料相比,电燃料的成本竞争力取决于低电力成本、低贴现率和高碳价格等有利条件。虽然欧盟将排放交易计划纳入海运将缩小成本差距,但鉴于目前的碳价格,这不太可能使电动燃料具有成本竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techno-economic analysis of electrofuel as a shipping fuel
In this study, we aim to evaluate the technical and economic requirements of electrofuel production through Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using green hydrogen and CO2. We find that a plant with a 1 000-barrel per day capacity necessitates 60 tH2 and 424 tCO2 daily, achieving a 36% hydrogen-to-electrofuel conversion rate. The initial capital expenditure (CAPEX) is projected at 295 million USD, with an additional 139 million USD for electrolyzer replacement. The hydrogen production unit accounts for 61% of the CAPEX, followed by the direct air capture unit at 22%. The annual operating expense (OPEX) is estimated at 49.3 million USD, with hydrogen production and direct air capture constituting 58% and 25% of this expense, respectively, largely due to substantial electricity requirements. The synthesis and refining units comprise 17% of the OPEX. The levelized cost of electrofuel is calculated at 1881 USD/t, which is 2.5 times the cost of marine gas oil and 3.8 times that of very low sulfur fuel oil. However, electrofuels emission factor is found to be significantly lower, nearly 14 times less carbon-intensive than traditional fuels. We conclude that electrofuels cost competitiveness with fossil fuels depends on favorable conditions such as low electricity costs, low discount rates, and high carbon prices. While the EU's ETS inclusion for maritime transport will lessen the cost disparity, it is unlikely to make electrofuels cost-competitive given the current carbon prices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信