压迫与附身--土著智慧与圣公会驱魔的现代视角

Hillary Raining
{"title":"压迫与附身--土著智慧与圣公会驱魔的现代视角","authors":"Hillary Raining","doi":"10.1177/00033286241261360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Rite of Exorcism is a controversial topic. Jesus, a prolific spiritual healer who cast out many demons in the name of the Kingdom of God, was not without his detractors either. His healings on the Sabbath were some of the primary evidence used against him leading up to his crucifixion. Even his disciples did not always understand his methods and could not perform exorcisms at times (Mk. 9:14-29). Thus, it is unsurprising that at different times in the last 2000 years, the use of the Rite has ebbed and flowed—almost reaching a fever-pitch at times, while sinking into obscurity at others. In the Episcopal tradition, exorcisms as an active ministry of the modern church can be feared, ignored, or scoffed at. Some of the disuse of the Rites of Exorcism are rightly due to the fact that we understand much more about the mental and physical health of humans than we did in ancient times. What many used to attribute to demonic forces can now be more widely understood as mental illness. Thus, many Episcopalians do not even know that there are provisions for exorcisms in our tradition: They assume those ritual acts of spiritual healing fall into the “primitive” past, when people did not have an understanding of mental illness. Even today, Native Americans suffer from a similar stereotype, viewed condescendingly as “savage,” with their spiritual healing practices dismissed. This pattern is especially true in the Anglican/Episcopal tradition, which has followed a similar journey as the Roman Catholic liturgical tradition, as well as the Protestant Enlightenment and the Charismatic Renewal Movement. One might expect that our current culture, saturated by enlightenment thinking, with its emphasis on all things rational and empirically proven data, would be poised to abandon it altogether. Yet, the data show that the desire for exorcisms and the belief in spiritual phenomena, including evil possession, is rising. This article will examine some of the reasons exorcisms have been repressed in the past and the lessons we should use to shape our current use of the rite of exorcisms. Pulling from the authors own research (including interviews with several Episcopal Exorcists and traditional Ojibwe healers) and experience as an Episcopal Priest and member of The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa, this paper explores trauma informed and Native American models for spiritual healing as examples of how the church might use exorcisms in its current cultural milieu.","PeriodicalId":8051,"journal":{"name":"Anglican theological review","volume":"34 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oppression and Possession—Indigenous Wisdom and a Modern View of Episcopal Exorcism\",\"authors\":\"Hillary Raining\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00033286241261360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Rite of Exorcism is a controversial topic. Jesus, a prolific spiritual healer who cast out many demons in the name of the Kingdom of God, was not without his detractors either. His healings on the Sabbath were some of the primary evidence used against him leading up to his crucifixion. Even his disciples did not always understand his methods and could not perform exorcisms at times (Mk. 9:14-29). Thus, it is unsurprising that at different times in the last 2000 years, the use of the Rite has ebbed and flowed—almost reaching a fever-pitch at times, while sinking into obscurity at others. In the Episcopal tradition, exorcisms as an active ministry of the modern church can be feared, ignored, or scoffed at. Some of the disuse of the Rites of Exorcism are rightly due to the fact that we understand much more about the mental and physical health of humans than we did in ancient times. What many used to attribute to demonic forces can now be more widely understood as mental illness. Thus, many Episcopalians do not even know that there are provisions for exorcisms in our tradition: They assume those ritual acts of spiritual healing fall into the “primitive” past, when people did not have an understanding of mental illness. Even today, Native Americans suffer from a similar stereotype, viewed condescendingly as “savage,” with their spiritual healing practices dismissed. This pattern is especially true in the Anglican/Episcopal tradition, which has followed a similar journey as the Roman Catholic liturgical tradition, as well as the Protestant Enlightenment and the Charismatic Renewal Movement. One might expect that our current culture, saturated by enlightenment thinking, with its emphasis on all things rational and empirically proven data, would be poised to abandon it altogether. Yet, the data show that the desire for exorcisms and the belief in spiritual phenomena, including evil possession, is rising. This article will examine some of the reasons exorcisms have been repressed in the past and the lessons we should use to shape our current use of the rite of exorcisms. Pulling from the authors own research (including interviews with several Episcopal Exorcists and traditional Ojibwe healers) and experience as an Episcopal Priest and member of The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa, this paper explores trauma informed and Native American models for spiritual healing as examples of how the church might use exorcisms in its current cultural milieu.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anglican theological review\",\"volume\":\"34 30\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anglican theological review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033286241261360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglican theological review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033286241261360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

驱魔仪式是一个有争议的话题。耶稣是一位多产的精神医治者,他以天国的名义赶走了许多恶魔,但他也并非没有诋毁者。他在安息日治病是导致他被钉死在十字架上的一些主要证据。就连他的门徒也不总是理解他的方法,有时甚至无法进行驱魔(可 9:14-29)。因此,在过去的两千年中,驱魔仪式的使用在不同时期起起伏伏--有时几乎达到狂热的程度,而有时则陷入默默无闻的境地,这也就不足为奇了。在圣公会的传统中,驱魔作为现代教会的一项积极事工,可能会被恐惧、忽视或嘲笑。驱魔仪式之所以被摒弃,有些原因是我们对人类身心健康的了解比古代要多得多。许多人过去认为是恶魔的力量造成的疾病,现在可以更广泛地理解为精神疾病。因此,许多圣公会教徒甚至不知道我们的传统中有关于驱魔的规定:他们认为这些精神治疗的仪式属于 "原始 "的过去,那时人们还不了解精神疾病。即使在今天,美国原住民也遭受着类似的刻板印象,他们被居高临下地视为 "野蛮人",他们的精神治疗实践也被摒弃。这种模式在英国圣公会/圣公会传统中尤为明显,其发展历程与罗马天主教礼仪传统、新教启蒙运动和灵恩复兴运动相似。人们可能会认为,我们当前的文化深受启蒙思想的影响,强调一切理性和经验证明的数据,因此会准备完全放弃它。然而,数据显示,人们对驱魔的渴望和对灵异现象(包括恶魔附身)的信仰正在上升。本文将探讨驱魔仪式在过去受到压制的一些原因,以及我们在当前使用驱魔仪式时应该吸取的教训。本文将从作者自己的研究(包括与几位圣公会驱魔师和传统奥吉布韦治疗师的访谈)以及作为圣公会牧师和索特-斯蒂-玛丽部落奇佩瓦人成员的经验出发,探讨创伤信息和美洲原住民的精神治疗模式,作为教会在当前文化环境中如何使用驱魔仪式的范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oppression and Possession—Indigenous Wisdom and a Modern View of Episcopal Exorcism
The Rite of Exorcism is a controversial topic. Jesus, a prolific spiritual healer who cast out many demons in the name of the Kingdom of God, was not without his detractors either. His healings on the Sabbath were some of the primary evidence used against him leading up to his crucifixion. Even his disciples did not always understand his methods and could not perform exorcisms at times (Mk. 9:14-29). Thus, it is unsurprising that at different times in the last 2000 years, the use of the Rite has ebbed and flowed—almost reaching a fever-pitch at times, while sinking into obscurity at others. In the Episcopal tradition, exorcisms as an active ministry of the modern church can be feared, ignored, or scoffed at. Some of the disuse of the Rites of Exorcism are rightly due to the fact that we understand much more about the mental and physical health of humans than we did in ancient times. What many used to attribute to demonic forces can now be more widely understood as mental illness. Thus, many Episcopalians do not even know that there are provisions for exorcisms in our tradition: They assume those ritual acts of spiritual healing fall into the “primitive” past, when people did not have an understanding of mental illness. Even today, Native Americans suffer from a similar stereotype, viewed condescendingly as “savage,” with their spiritual healing practices dismissed. This pattern is especially true in the Anglican/Episcopal tradition, which has followed a similar journey as the Roman Catholic liturgical tradition, as well as the Protestant Enlightenment and the Charismatic Renewal Movement. One might expect that our current culture, saturated by enlightenment thinking, with its emphasis on all things rational and empirically proven data, would be poised to abandon it altogether. Yet, the data show that the desire for exorcisms and the belief in spiritual phenomena, including evil possession, is rising. This article will examine some of the reasons exorcisms have been repressed in the past and the lessons we should use to shape our current use of the rite of exorcisms. Pulling from the authors own research (including interviews with several Episcopal Exorcists and traditional Ojibwe healers) and experience as an Episcopal Priest and member of The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa, this paper explores trauma informed and Native American models for spiritual healing as examples of how the church might use exorcisms in its current cultural milieu.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信