用于配水管网漏水检测的编码器-解码器神经网络的性能

Water Supply Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.2166/ws.2024.174
P. Mohan Doss, M. Rokstad, F. Tscheikner-Gratl
{"title":"用于配水管网漏水检测的编码器-解码器神经网络的性能","authors":"P. Mohan Doss, M. Rokstad, F. Tscheikner-Gratl","doi":"10.2166/ws.2024.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This work outlines the performance of three variants of deep neural networks for leak detection in water distribution networks, namely – autoencoders (AEs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), and long short-term memory autoencoders (LSTM-AEs). The multivariate pressure signals reconstructed from these models are analysed for leakage identification. The leak onset time is estimated using a fast approximation sliding window technique, which computes statistical discrepancies in prediction errors. The performance of all three variants is validated using the widely studied L-Town benchmark network. Furthermore, their feasibility for real-world application is studied by applying them to a real-world case study representing the data availability and network design often found in smaller- and medium-sized utilities in Norway. The results for the benchmark network showed that AE and LSTM-AE showed comparable detection performance for abrupt leaks with VAE performing the least. For incipient leaks, the LSTM-AE showed better detection performance with few false-positives. For the real-world dataset, the performance was significantly lower due to the quantity and quality of data available, and the contradiction of inherent requirements of data-driven models. In addition, the analysis revealed that the positioning of pressure sensors in the network is critical for the leak detection performance of these models.","PeriodicalId":509977,"journal":{"name":"Water Supply","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The performance of encoder–decoder neural networks for leak detection in water distribution networks\",\"authors\":\"P. Mohan Doss, M. Rokstad, F. Tscheikner-Gratl\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/ws.2024.174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This work outlines the performance of three variants of deep neural networks for leak detection in water distribution networks, namely – autoencoders (AEs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), and long short-term memory autoencoders (LSTM-AEs). The multivariate pressure signals reconstructed from these models are analysed for leakage identification. The leak onset time is estimated using a fast approximation sliding window technique, which computes statistical discrepancies in prediction errors. The performance of all three variants is validated using the widely studied L-Town benchmark network. Furthermore, their feasibility for real-world application is studied by applying them to a real-world case study representing the data availability and network design often found in smaller- and medium-sized utilities in Norway. The results for the benchmark network showed that AE and LSTM-AE showed comparable detection performance for abrupt leaks with VAE performing the least. For incipient leaks, the LSTM-AE showed better detection performance with few false-positives. For the real-world dataset, the performance was significantly lower due to the quantity and quality of data available, and the contradiction of inherent requirements of data-driven models. In addition, the analysis revealed that the positioning of pressure sensors in the network is critical for the leak detection performance of these models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Supply\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Supply\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Supply","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究概述了用于配水管网泄漏检测的三种深度神经网络变体的性能,即自动编码器(AE)、变异自动编码器(VAE)和长短期记忆自动编码器(LSTM-AE)。从这些模型中重建的多变量压力信号可用于泄漏识别分析。使用快速近似滑动窗口技术估算泄漏发生时间,该技术计算预测误差的统计差异。使用广泛研究的 L-Town 基准网络验证了所有三种变体的性能。此外,通过将它们应用于实际案例研究,研究了它们在现实世界中应用的可行性,该案例研究代表了挪威中小型公用事业中常见的数据可用性和网络设计。基准网络的结果表明,AE 和 LSTM-AE 对突然泄漏的检测性能相当,而 VAE 的性能最低。对于初期泄漏,LSTM-AE 的检测性能更高,误报率更低。对于真实世界数据集,由于可用数据的数量和质量以及与数据驱动模型内在要求的矛盾,其性能明显较低。此外,分析表明,压力传感器在网络中的定位对这些模型的泄漏检测性能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The performance of encoder–decoder neural networks for leak detection in water distribution networks
This work outlines the performance of three variants of deep neural networks for leak detection in water distribution networks, namely – autoencoders (AEs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), and long short-term memory autoencoders (LSTM-AEs). The multivariate pressure signals reconstructed from these models are analysed for leakage identification. The leak onset time is estimated using a fast approximation sliding window technique, which computes statistical discrepancies in prediction errors. The performance of all three variants is validated using the widely studied L-Town benchmark network. Furthermore, their feasibility for real-world application is studied by applying them to a real-world case study representing the data availability and network design often found in smaller- and medium-sized utilities in Norway. The results for the benchmark network showed that AE and LSTM-AE showed comparable detection performance for abrupt leaks with VAE performing the least. For incipient leaks, the LSTM-AE showed better detection performance with few false-positives. For the real-world dataset, the performance was significantly lower due to the quantity and quality of data available, and the contradiction of inherent requirements of data-driven models. In addition, the analysis revealed that the positioning of pressure sensors in the network is critical for the leak detection performance of these models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信