2000-2018 年各州党派主导地位与 TANF 资金分配情况

Q2 Social Sciences
Jonathan Winburn, Robert Brown, Nichole Gligor
{"title":"2000-2018 年各州党派主导地位与 TANF 资金分配情况","authors":"Jonathan Winburn, Robert Brown, Nichole Gligor","doi":"10.1177/0160323x241262047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this field note, we examine the changing distribution of TANF spending patterns across the states. Given the important shift from the more restrictive categorical grant of AFDC to the more flexible block grant of TANF, examining patterns of spending across program categories is an important facet for understanding states’ welfare efforts. Overall, there has been a general decrease in the percentage of state TANF spending on cash assistance. Using a new measure of party dominance, we find that Democratic states initially spent a higher share of their TANF funds on cash assistance than Republican states. However, by the 2010s this partisan difference basically disappeared with Democratic states spending patterns matching those of Republican states, focusing less on cash assistance and giving greater priority to areas less reflective of TANF’s principal objectives.","PeriodicalId":52260,"journal":{"name":"State and Local Government Review","volume":"84 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Partisan Dominance and the Distribution of TANF Funds, 2000–2018\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Winburn, Robert Brown, Nichole Gligor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0160323x241262047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this field note, we examine the changing distribution of TANF spending patterns across the states. Given the important shift from the more restrictive categorical grant of AFDC to the more flexible block grant of TANF, examining patterns of spending across program categories is an important facet for understanding states’ welfare efforts. Overall, there has been a general decrease in the percentage of state TANF spending on cash assistance. Using a new measure of party dominance, we find that Democratic states initially spent a higher share of their TANF funds on cash assistance than Republican states. However, by the 2010s this partisan difference basically disappeared with Democratic states spending patterns matching those of Republican states, focusing less on cash assistance and giving greater priority to areas less reflective of TANF’s principal objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"State and Local Government Review\",\"volume\":\"84 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"State and Local Government Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x241262047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Local Government Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x241262047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本实地说明中,我们研究了各州 TANF 支出模式不断变化的分布情况。鉴于从限制性更强的分类补助(AFDC)向更灵活的整体补助(TANF)的重要转变,研究各计划类别的支出模式是了解各州福利工作的一个重要方面。总体而言,各州用于现金援助的 TANF 支出比例普遍下降。通过使用一种新的政党优势衡量方法,我们发现民主党各州最初用于现金援助的 TANF 资金比例高于共和党各州。然而,到了 2010 年代,这种党派差异基本消失,民主党各州的支出模式与共和党各州一致,减少了对现金援助的关注,而更多地优先考虑那些较少反映 TANF 主要目标的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Partisan Dominance and the Distribution of TANF Funds, 2000–2018
In this field note, we examine the changing distribution of TANF spending patterns across the states. Given the important shift from the more restrictive categorical grant of AFDC to the more flexible block grant of TANF, examining patterns of spending across program categories is an important facet for understanding states’ welfare efforts. Overall, there has been a general decrease in the percentage of state TANF spending on cash assistance. Using a new measure of party dominance, we find that Democratic states initially spent a higher share of their TANF funds on cash assistance than Republican states. However, by the 2010s this partisan difference basically disappeared with Democratic states spending patterns matching those of Republican states, focusing less on cash assistance and giving greater priority to areas less reflective of TANF’s principal objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
State and Local Government Review
State and Local Government Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信