不同分布布置下带有砌体填充墙的三维钢筋混凝土结构的抗震脆性评估

Q2 Engineering
Salah Guettala, Akram Khelaifia, Issam Abdesselam, Rachid Chebili, Salim Guettala
{"title":"不同分布布置下带有砌体填充墙的三维钢筋混凝土结构的抗震脆性评估","authors":"Salah Guettala,&nbsp;Akram Khelaifia,&nbsp;Issam Abdesselam,&nbsp;Rachid Chebili,&nbsp;Salim Guettala","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01126-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infill walls under different distribution arrangements. Over the past six decades, the interaction between reinforced concrete frames and infill walls has been crucial due to its impact on structural behavior during earthquakes. This study utilizes pushover and fragility analyses to assess the effects of various infill wall distributions on reinforced concrete frames. The results demonstrate that the presence of infill walls significantly enhances lateral stiffness and alters the overall structural response. Results indicate that symmetrically distributed infill walls significantly increase lateral stiffness and base shear capacity compared to models without infill walls, while asymmetrical or partially filled models show lesser improvements. Fragility analysis shows varying collapse probabilities and damage susceptibility based on infill wall distribution, with symmetric arrangements demonstrating lower collapse likelihood and higher safety levels. Models with infill walls on one side or lacking them on the ground floor exhibit higher fragility, especially under severe damage scenarios, highlighting the critical role of symmetric infill wall placement in enhancing seismic resilience and ensuring building safety in earthquake-prone regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 7","pages":"5525 - 5532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of seismic fragility of 3D reinforced concrete structures with masonry infill walls under different distribution arrangements\",\"authors\":\"Salah Guettala,&nbsp;Akram Khelaifia,&nbsp;Issam Abdesselam,&nbsp;Rachid Chebili,&nbsp;Salim Guettala\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42107-024-01126-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infill walls under different distribution arrangements. Over the past six decades, the interaction between reinforced concrete frames and infill walls has been crucial due to its impact on structural behavior during earthquakes. This study utilizes pushover and fragility analyses to assess the effects of various infill wall distributions on reinforced concrete frames. The results demonstrate that the presence of infill walls significantly enhances lateral stiffness and alters the overall structural response. Results indicate that symmetrically distributed infill walls significantly increase lateral stiffness and base shear capacity compared to models without infill walls, while asymmetrical or partially filled models show lesser improvements. Fragility analysis shows varying collapse probabilities and damage susceptibility based on infill wall distribution, with symmetric arrangements demonstrating lower collapse likelihood and higher safety levels. Models with infill walls on one side or lacking them on the ground floor exhibit higher fragility, especially under severe damage scenarios, highlighting the critical role of symmetric infill wall placement in enhancing seismic resilience and ensuring building safety in earthquake-prone regions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"5525 - 5532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01126-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01126-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了带有砌体填充墙的钢筋混凝土结构在不同分布布置下的抗震性能。在过去的六十年中,钢筋混凝土框架与填充墙之间的相互作用因其在地震中对结构行为的影响而变得至关重要。本研究利用推移和脆性分析来评估各种填充墙分布对钢筋混凝土框架的影响。结果表明,填充墙的存在大大增强了侧向刚度,改变了整体结构响应。结果表明,与没有填充墙的模型相比,对称分布的填充墙能显著提高侧向刚度和基底抗剪能力,而不对称或部分填充的模型则改善较小。脆性分析表明,根据填充墙的分布,倒塌概率和损坏敏感性各不相同,对称布置的模型倒塌概率较低,安全等级较高。一侧有填充墙或底层没有填充墙的模型表现出更高的脆性,尤其是在严重破坏情况下,这突出表明了对称填充墙布置在提高抗震能力和确保地震多发地区建筑安全方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of seismic fragility of 3D reinforced concrete structures with masonry infill walls under different distribution arrangements

This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infill walls under different distribution arrangements. Over the past six decades, the interaction between reinforced concrete frames and infill walls has been crucial due to its impact on structural behavior during earthquakes. This study utilizes pushover and fragility analyses to assess the effects of various infill wall distributions on reinforced concrete frames. The results demonstrate that the presence of infill walls significantly enhances lateral stiffness and alters the overall structural response. Results indicate that symmetrically distributed infill walls significantly increase lateral stiffness and base shear capacity compared to models without infill walls, while asymmetrical or partially filled models show lesser improvements. Fragility analysis shows varying collapse probabilities and damage susceptibility based on infill wall distribution, with symmetric arrangements demonstrating lower collapse likelihood and higher safety levels. Models with infill walls on one side or lacking them on the ground floor exhibit higher fragility, especially under severe damage scenarios, highlighting the critical role of symmetric infill wall placement in enhancing seismic resilience and ensuring building safety in earthquake-prone regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信