在 COVID-19 大流行期间,社区中扑热息痛治疗失误率上升

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Nicole O'Shea BPharm, MClinPharm, MSHP, GradCertPharmPrac, GradCertHlthMgmt, FANZCAP (Tox, MedSafety), Rohan A. Elliott BPharm, BpharmSc(Hons), MClinPharm, PhD, FSHP, FANZCAP (GeriMed, Research), Anselm Wong MBBS, DipTox, PhD, FACEM, FACMT, FAACT, FEAPCCT
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,社区中扑热息痛治疗失误率上升","authors":"Nicole O'Shea BPharm, MClinPharm, MSHP, GradCertPharmPrac, GradCertHlthMgmt, FANZCAP (Tox, MedSafety),&nbsp;Rohan A. Elliott BPharm, BpharmSc(Hons), MClinPharm, PhD, FSHP, FANZCAP (GeriMed, Research),&nbsp;Anselm Wong MBBS, DipTox, PhD, FACEM, FACMT, FAACT, FEAPCCT","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Treatment guidelines for COVID-19 recommend basic analgesics/antipyretics such as paracetamol.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Paracetamol therapeutic errors are associated with morbidity and mortality.<span><sup>2</sup></span> The Victorian Poisons Information Centre (VPIC), the statewide poisons centre for Victoria, Australia, receives calls from members of the public for advice regarding errors made with medicines. Paracetamol therapeutic errors are usually accidental overdoses (e.g. double-dose, maximum daily dose exceeded, incorrectly measured liquid paracetamol, or use of two paracetamol-containing medicines). The aim of this research was to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases in the community (outside of hospitals) that were reported to VPIC.</p><p>Call records were extracted from the VPIC database from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2022 (approximately 2.5 years before and after the first cases of COVID-19 in Victoria). Retrospectively, records were reviewed where callers reported a therapeutic error with any form of paracetamol that occurred in an adult or child in the home or community.</p><p>In the 2.5 years prior to the pandemic there was an average of 120 (standard deviation [SD] 21) paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month. In the 2.5 years from January 2020 there was an average of 116 (SD 33) cases per month, but case numbers varied as the Victorian population went into and out of lockdown (lockdowns were a stay-at-home order to reduce the spread of COVID-19). During the first two Melbourne lockdowns, which occurred between 31 March 2020–12 May 2020 and 9 July 2020–27 October 2020,<span><sup>3</sup></span> the average number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month fell to 60 (SD 19) and 80 (SD 5) per month, respectively. During this time, COVID-19 cases remained low (Figure 1).<span><sup>4</sup></span> When the number of COVID-19 cases rose in the second half of 2021, the average number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month increased.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The mean number of cases after lockdowns ended (22 October 2021–30 June 2022) was 145 per month compared to 120 per month pre-pandemic (p &lt; 0.001).</p><p>In reviewing cases related to paediatrics and adolescents (defined in the database as people ≤19 years of age) prior to COVID-19, the average number of therapeutic error cases was 62.66 (SD 13) per month. After the COVID-19 lockdown periods, the average number of therapeutic error cases per month increased to 80 (SD 26, p &lt; 0.001).</p><p>The lower number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases reported to VPIC during the first two lockdowns could be explained by an overall reduction in viral illness due to prolonged lockdowns and improved infection control (e.g. social distancing, face masks, improved hand hygiene).<span><sup>5</sup></span> The statistically significant increase in paracetamol therapeutic errors in the post-lockdown period, compared to pre-COVID-19, may be due to the increased paracetamol use in the community due to high COVID-19 case numbers and other viral illnesses such as influenza.</p><p>A limitation of the data is that only cases reported to VPIC were included. We do not have data on how many patients experienced toxicity from their overdose, but the numbers of patients referred to hospital or in hospital are included in Figure 1.</p><p>Callers were not routinely asked about what had caused the paracetamol therapeutic error. Anecdotally, VPIC staff noted that people with COVID-19 symptoms often reported taking paracetamol 4-hourly, without regard to the maximum daily dose. Some callers reported that they were instructed by a health professional to take paracetamol 4-hourly. It is important that the public and health professionals understand the risks associated with paracetamol and how to use paracetamol safely in the management of acute viral illnesses.</p><p>None.</p><p>Rohan A. Elliot was the former Geriatric Therapeutics Review Editor for the <i>Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research</i> and an author of this article. He was excluded from editorial decision-making related to the acceptance and publication of this article. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p><p><b>Nicole O'Shea:</b> Writing – original draft; project administration; formal analysis; investigation; methodology. <b>Rohan A. Elliott:</b> Formal analysis; validation; writing – review and editing; supervision; data curation. <b>Anselm Wong:</b> Project administration; writing – review and editing; validation; resources; supervision.</p><p>Ethical approval was granted by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: HREC/67865/Austin-2020) and the study conforms to the <i>Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research</i>.</p><p>This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"54 5","pages":"436-438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1936","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rise in paracetamol therapeutic errors in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Nicole O'Shea BPharm, MClinPharm, MSHP, GradCertPharmPrac, GradCertHlthMgmt, FANZCAP (Tox, MedSafety),&nbsp;Rohan A. Elliott BPharm, BpharmSc(Hons), MClinPharm, PhD, FSHP, FANZCAP (GeriMed, Research),&nbsp;Anselm Wong MBBS, DipTox, PhD, FACEM, FACMT, FAACT, FEAPCCT\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Treatment guidelines for COVID-19 recommend basic analgesics/antipyretics such as paracetamol.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Paracetamol therapeutic errors are associated with morbidity and mortality.<span><sup>2</sup></span> The Victorian Poisons Information Centre (VPIC), the statewide poisons centre for Victoria, Australia, receives calls from members of the public for advice regarding errors made with medicines. Paracetamol therapeutic errors are usually accidental overdoses (e.g. double-dose, maximum daily dose exceeded, incorrectly measured liquid paracetamol, or use of two paracetamol-containing medicines). The aim of this research was to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases in the community (outside of hospitals) that were reported to VPIC.</p><p>Call records were extracted from the VPIC database from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2022 (approximately 2.5 years before and after the first cases of COVID-19 in Victoria). Retrospectively, records were reviewed where callers reported a therapeutic error with any form of paracetamol that occurred in an adult or child in the home or community.</p><p>In the 2.5 years prior to the pandemic there was an average of 120 (standard deviation [SD] 21) paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month. In the 2.5 years from January 2020 there was an average of 116 (SD 33) cases per month, but case numbers varied as the Victorian population went into and out of lockdown (lockdowns were a stay-at-home order to reduce the spread of COVID-19). During the first two Melbourne lockdowns, which occurred between 31 March 2020–12 May 2020 and 9 July 2020–27 October 2020,<span><sup>3</sup></span> the average number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month fell to 60 (SD 19) and 80 (SD 5) per month, respectively. During this time, COVID-19 cases remained low (Figure 1).<span><sup>4</sup></span> When the number of COVID-19 cases rose in the second half of 2021, the average number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month increased.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The mean number of cases after lockdowns ended (22 October 2021–30 June 2022) was 145 per month compared to 120 per month pre-pandemic (p &lt; 0.001).</p><p>In reviewing cases related to paediatrics and adolescents (defined in the database as people ≤19 years of age) prior to COVID-19, the average number of therapeutic error cases was 62.66 (SD 13) per month. After the COVID-19 lockdown periods, the average number of therapeutic error cases per month increased to 80 (SD 26, p &lt; 0.001).</p><p>The lower number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases reported to VPIC during the first two lockdowns could be explained by an overall reduction in viral illness due to prolonged lockdowns and improved infection control (e.g. social distancing, face masks, improved hand hygiene).<span><sup>5</sup></span> The statistically significant increase in paracetamol therapeutic errors in the post-lockdown period, compared to pre-COVID-19, may be due to the increased paracetamol use in the community due to high COVID-19 case numbers and other viral illnesses such as influenza.</p><p>A limitation of the data is that only cases reported to VPIC were included. We do not have data on how many patients experienced toxicity from their overdose, but the numbers of patients referred to hospital or in hospital are included in Figure 1.</p><p>Callers were not routinely asked about what had caused the paracetamol therapeutic error. Anecdotally, VPIC staff noted that people with COVID-19 symptoms often reported taking paracetamol 4-hourly, without regard to the maximum daily dose. Some callers reported that they were instructed by a health professional to take paracetamol 4-hourly. It is important that the public and health professionals understand the risks associated with paracetamol and how to use paracetamol safely in the management of acute viral illnesses.</p><p>None.</p><p>Rohan A. Elliot was the former Geriatric Therapeutics Review Editor for the <i>Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research</i> and an author of this article. He was excluded from editorial decision-making related to the acceptance and publication of this article. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p><p><b>Nicole O'Shea:</b> Writing – original draft; project administration; formal analysis; investigation; methodology. <b>Rohan A. Elliott:</b> Formal analysis; validation; writing – review and editing; supervision; data curation. <b>Anselm Wong:</b> Project administration; writing – review and editing; validation; resources; supervision.</p><p>Ethical approval was granted by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: HREC/67865/Austin-2020) and the study conforms to the <i>Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research</i>.</p><p>This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"436-438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1936\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1 扑热息痛治疗错误与发病率和死亡率有关。2 澳大利亚维多利亚州毒物信息中心(VPIC)是维多利亚州的全州毒物中心,经常接到公众关于用药错误的咨询电话。扑热息痛的治疗错误通常是意外过量使用(如双倍剂量、超过每日最大剂量、错误测量液体扑热息痛或使用两种含扑热息痛的药物)。本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行对社区(医院外)向 VPIC 报告的扑热息痛治疗性误诊病例数量的影响。研究人员从 VPIC 数据库中提取了 2017 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日(维多利亚州出现首例 COVID-19 前后约 2.5 年)的呼叫记录。回顾性地审查了来电者报告的发生在家庭或社区中成人或儿童身上的任何形式扑热息痛治疗错误的记录。在大流行之前的 2.5 年中,平均每月有 120 例(标准差 [SD] 21)扑热息痛治疗错误病例。从 2020 年 1 月起的 2.5 年中,平均每月有 116 例(标准差为 33),但病例数会随着维多利亚州人口进入和退出封锁状态而变化(封锁状态是为了减少 COVID-19 的传播而发出的留在家中的命令)。在墨尔本前两次封锁期间,即 2020 年 3 月 31 日至 2020 年 5 月 12 日和 2020 年 7 月 9 日至 2020 年 10 月 27 日3 ,扑热息痛治疗失误的月平均病例数分别降至每月 60 例(标清 19 例)和 80 例(标清 5 例)。4 2021 年下半年 COVID-19 病例数上升时,扑热息痛治疗性误诊的月平均病例数也随之上升。封锁结束后(2021 年 10 月 22 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日)的平均病例数为每月 145 例,而疫情发生前为每月 120 例(p < 0.001)。在 COVID-19 之前,在审查与儿科和青少年(数据库中定义为年龄小于 19 岁者)相关的病例时,治疗性误差病例的平均数量为每月 62.66 例(标度 13)。在前两次封锁期间,向 VPIC 报告的扑热息痛治疗失误病例数较少,这可能是由于封锁时间延长和感染控制的改善(如:社交疏远、口罩等)导致病毒性疾病的总体减少。5 与 COVID-19 发生前相比,封锁后的扑热息痛治疗差错在统计上有显著增加,这可能是由于 COVID-19 病例数高以及流感等其他病毒性疾病导致社区中扑热息痛的使用量增加。我们没有数据显示有多少患者因服用过量扑热息痛而中毒,但图 1 中包含了转院或住院患者的人数。根据轶事,VPIC 工作人员注意到,出现 COVID-19 症状的患者通常表示每 4 小时服用一次扑热息痛,而不考虑每日最大剂量。一些来电者称,医疗专业人员指示他们每4小时服用一次扑热息痛。公众和医疗专业人员必须了解扑热息痛的相关风险,以及如何在治疗急性病毒性疾病时安全使用扑热息痛。他被排除在与接受和发表这篇文章相关的编辑决策之外。其余作者声明他们没有利益冲突。Nicole O'Shea:写作-原稿;项目管理;正式分析;调查;方法学。罗汉-艾略特(Rohan A. Elliott):正式分析;验证;写作--审阅和编辑;监督;数据整理。Anselm Wong:奥斯汀健康人类研究伦理委员会(参考编号:HREC/67865/Austin-2020)对本研究进行了伦理审批,本研究符合澳大利亚国家人类研究伦理行为声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Rise in paracetamol therapeutic errors in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic

Rise in paracetamol therapeutic errors in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic

Treatment guidelines for COVID-19 recommend basic analgesics/antipyretics such as paracetamol.1 Paracetamol therapeutic errors are associated with morbidity and mortality.2 The Victorian Poisons Information Centre (VPIC), the statewide poisons centre for Victoria, Australia, receives calls from members of the public for advice regarding errors made with medicines. Paracetamol therapeutic errors are usually accidental overdoses (e.g. double-dose, maximum daily dose exceeded, incorrectly measured liquid paracetamol, or use of two paracetamol-containing medicines). The aim of this research was to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases in the community (outside of hospitals) that were reported to VPIC.

Call records were extracted from the VPIC database from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2022 (approximately 2.5 years before and after the first cases of COVID-19 in Victoria). Retrospectively, records were reviewed where callers reported a therapeutic error with any form of paracetamol that occurred in an adult or child in the home or community.

In the 2.5 years prior to the pandemic there was an average of 120 (standard deviation [SD] 21) paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month. In the 2.5 years from January 2020 there was an average of 116 (SD 33) cases per month, but case numbers varied as the Victorian population went into and out of lockdown (lockdowns were a stay-at-home order to reduce the spread of COVID-19). During the first two Melbourne lockdowns, which occurred between 31 March 2020–12 May 2020 and 9 July 2020–27 October 2020,3 the average number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month fell to 60 (SD 19) and 80 (SD 5) per month, respectively. During this time, COVID-19 cases remained low (Figure 1).4 When the number of COVID-19 cases rose in the second half of 2021, the average number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases per month increased.4 The mean number of cases after lockdowns ended (22 October 2021–30 June 2022) was 145 per month compared to 120 per month pre-pandemic (p < 0.001).

In reviewing cases related to paediatrics and adolescents (defined in the database as people ≤19 years of age) prior to COVID-19, the average number of therapeutic error cases was 62.66 (SD 13) per month. After the COVID-19 lockdown periods, the average number of therapeutic error cases per month increased to 80 (SD 26, p < 0.001).

The lower number of paracetamol therapeutic error cases reported to VPIC during the first two lockdowns could be explained by an overall reduction in viral illness due to prolonged lockdowns and improved infection control (e.g. social distancing, face masks, improved hand hygiene).5 The statistically significant increase in paracetamol therapeutic errors in the post-lockdown period, compared to pre-COVID-19, may be due to the increased paracetamol use in the community due to high COVID-19 case numbers and other viral illnesses such as influenza.

A limitation of the data is that only cases reported to VPIC were included. We do not have data on how many patients experienced toxicity from their overdose, but the numbers of patients referred to hospital or in hospital are included in Figure 1.

Callers were not routinely asked about what had caused the paracetamol therapeutic error. Anecdotally, VPIC staff noted that people with COVID-19 symptoms often reported taking paracetamol 4-hourly, without regard to the maximum daily dose. Some callers reported that they were instructed by a health professional to take paracetamol 4-hourly. It is important that the public and health professionals understand the risks associated with paracetamol and how to use paracetamol safely in the management of acute viral illnesses.

None.

Rohan A. Elliot was the former Geriatric Therapeutics Review Editor for the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research and an author of this article. He was excluded from editorial decision-making related to the acceptance and publication of this article. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Nicole O'Shea: Writing – original draft; project administration; formal analysis; investigation; methodology. Rohan A. Elliott: Formal analysis; validation; writing – review and editing; supervision; data curation. Anselm Wong: Project administration; writing – review and editing; validation; resources; supervision.

Ethical approval was granted by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: HREC/67865/Austin-2020) and the study conforms to the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信