{"title":"霍扎瓦-利夫希茨引力参数的观测约束","authors":"Himanshu Chaudhary, Ujjal Debnath, Shibesh Kumar Jas Pacif, Niyaz Uddin Molla, Ghulam Mustafa, Sunil Kumar Maurya","doi":"10.1002/andp.202400181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the accelerated cosmic expansion within the Hořava–Lifshitz (HL) Model. To constrain the cosmological parameters of this model, 17 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation points, 31 Cosmic Chronometer points, 40 Type Ia Supernovae points, 24 quasar Hubble diagram points, and 162 Gamma Ray Bursts points, along with the latest Hubble constant measurement (R22) are incorporated. <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$r_{d}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is treated as a free parameter to extract <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>H</mi>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$H_{0}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$r_{d}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> using late-time datasets, aiming for optimal fitting values in each model. Treating <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$r_{d}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> as free improves precision, reduces bias, and enhances dataset compatibility. The obtained values of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>H</mi>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$H_{0}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$r_{d}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> are compared to the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Λ</mi>\n <mi>CDM</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\Lambda{\\rm CDM}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> model, showing consistency with previous estimates from Planck and SDSS studies. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) favor the Hořava–Lifshitz model, with the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Λ</mi>\n <mi>CDM</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\Lambda{\\rm CDM}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> model having the lowest AIC. Additionally, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mi>AIC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\Delta{\\rm AIC}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mi>BIC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\Delta{\\rm BIC}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> analyses are conducted to assess model preference. Validation using the reduced <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>χ</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msubsup>\n <annotation>$\\chi _{red}^{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> statistic indicates satisfactory fits for the Hořava–Lifshitz model, while recognizing <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Λ</mi>\n <mi>CDM</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\Lambda{\\rm CDM}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> as the preferred model. Extensions of the analysis warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7896,"journal":{"name":"Annalen der Physik","volume":"536 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational Constraints on the Parameters of Hořava–Lifshitz Gravity\",\"authors\":\"Himanshu Chaudhary, Ujjal Debnath, Shibesh Kumar Jas Pacif, Niyaz Uddin Molla, Ghulam Mustafa, Sunil Kumar Maurya\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/andp.202400181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates the accelerated cosmic expansion within the Hořava–Lifshitz (HL) Model. To constrain the cosmological parameters of this model, 17 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation points, 31 Cosmic Chronometer points, 40 Type Ia Supernovae points, 24 quasar Hubble diagram points, and 162 Gamma Ray Bursts points, along with the latest Hubble constant measurement (R22) are incorporated. <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$r_{d}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> is treated as a free parameter to extract <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>H</mi>\\n <mn>0</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$H_{0}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$r_{d}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> using late-time datasets, aiming for optimal fitting values in each model. Treating <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$r_{d}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> as free improves precision, reduces bias, and enhances dataset compatibility. The obtained values of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>H</mi>\\n <mn>0</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$H_{0}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$r_{d}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> are compared to the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>Λ</mi>\\n <mi>CDM</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\Lambda{\\\\rm CDM}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> model, showing consistency with previous estimates from Planck and SDSS studies. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) favor the Hořava–Lifshitz model, with the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>Λ</mi>\\n <mi>CDM</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\Lambda{\\\\rm CDM}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> model having the lowest AIC. Additionally, <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>Δ</mi>\\n <mi>AIC</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\Delta{\\\\rm AIC}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>Δ</mi>\\n <mi>BIC</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\Delta{\\\\rm BIC}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> analyses are conducted to assess model preference. Validation using the reduced <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>χ</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msubsup>\\n <annotation>$\\\\chi _{red}^{2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> statistic indicates satisfactory fits for the Hořava–Lifshitz model, while recognizing <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>Λ</mi>\\n <mi>CDM</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\Lambda{\\\\rm CDM}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> as the preferred model. Extensions of the analysis warrant further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annalen der Physik\",\"volume\":\"536 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annalen der Physik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.202400181\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annalen der Physik","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.202400181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Observational Constraints on the Parameters of Hořava–Lifshitz Gravity
This study investigates the accelerated cosmic expansion within the Hořava–Lifshitz (HL) Model. To constrain the cosmological parameters of this model, 17 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation points, 31 Cosmic Chronometer points, 40 Type Ia Supernovae points, 24 quasar Hubble diagram points, and 162 Gamma Ray Bursts points, along with the latest Hubble constant measurement (R22) are incorporated. is treated as a free parameter to extract and using late-time datasets, aiming for optimal fitting values in each model. Treating as free improves precision, reduces bias, and enhances dataset compatibility. The obtained values of and are compared to the model, showing consistency with previous estimates from Planck and SDSS studies. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) favor the Hořava–Lifshitz model, with the model having the lowest AIC. Additionally, and analyses are conducted to assess model preference. Validation using the reduced statistic indicates satisfactory fits for the Hořava–Lifshitz model, while recognizing as the preferred model. Extensions of the analysis warrant further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Annalen der Physik (AdP) is one of the world''s most renowned physics journals with an over 225 years'' tradition of excellence. Based on the fame of seminal papers by Einstein, Planck and many others, the journal is now tuned towards today''s most exciting findings including the annual Nobel Lectures. AdP comprises all areas of physics, with particular emphasis on important, significant and highly relevant results. Topics range from fundamental research to forefront applications including dynamic and interdisciplinary fields. The journal covers theory, simulation and experiment, e.g., but not exclusively, in condensed matter, quantum physics, photonics, materials physics, high energy, gravitation and astrophysics. It welcomes Rapid Research Letters, Original Papers, Review and Feature Articles.