女性乳房改造手术中光滑假体和纹理假体并发症的特点比较

Yusufov Stiven Ranbomovich, Yusufova Eteri Ranbomovna, Filimonov Dmitry Alekseevich, Ishchenko Roman Viktorovich
{"title":"女性乳房改造手术中光滑假体和纹理假体并发症的特点比较","authors":"Yusufov Stiven Ranbomovich, Yusufova Eteri Ranbomovna, Filimonov Dmitry Alekseevich, Ishchenko Roman Viktorovich","doi":"10.1177/07488068241253470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare breast modification surgeries using smooth and textured implants in terms of a complication profile. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies reporting complication rates and quality of life on the BREAST-Q questionnaire in groups of patients with smooth and textured implants. The odds ratios of the following complications between the groups were calculated: capsular contracture, hematoma, infection, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates. And mean differences for BREAST-Q scores were also calculated. A meta-analysis of 14 studies was performed in this article. No significant differences were found in the odds of capsular contracture, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates between groups. The chance of developing infection was statistically significantly lower with smooth implants. The chance of hematoma development was statistically significantly lower with textured implants. Comparison of BREAST-Q results showed no difference between the groups. Our results suggest that using smooth implants is associated with a lower chance of infection and a higher chance of hematoma development.","PeriodicalId":508479,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Сharacteristic of Complications in Smooth and Textured Implants for Breast Modification Surgeries Performed in Women\",\"authors\":\"Yusufov Stiven Ranbomovich, Yusufova Eteri Ranbomovna, Filimonov Dmitry Alekseevich, Ishchenko Roman Viktorovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07488068241253470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare breast modification surgeries using smooth and textured implants in terms of a complication profile. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies reporting complication rates and quality of life on the BREAST-Q questionnaire in groups of patients with smooth and textured implants. The odds ratios of the following complications between the groups were calculated: capsular contracture, hematoma, infection, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates. And mean differences for BREAST-Q scores were also calculated. A meta-analysis of 14 studies was performed in this article. No significant differences were found in the odds of capsular contracture, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates between groups. The chance of developing infection was statistically significantly lower with smooth implants. The chance of hematoma development was statistically significantly lower with textured implants. Comparison of BREAST-Q results showed no difference between the groups. Our results suggest that using smooth implants is associated with a lower chance of infection and a higher chance of hematoma development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068241253470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068241253470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在全面比较使用光滑假体和纹理假体进行乳房改造手术的并发症情况。我们在 PubMed、ScienceDirect、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中搜索了相关研究,这些研究报告了使用光滑假体和有纹理假体的患者群体的并发症发生率和 BREAST-Q 问卷调查的生活质量。计算了两组患者出现以下并发症的几率:包膜挛缩、血肿、感染、位置不正、血清肿、乳房波纹、假体破裂和再次手术率。此外,还计算了 BREAST-Q 评分的平均差异。本文对 14 项研究进行了荟萃分析。发现不同组间发生包膜挛缩、位置不正、血清肿、乳房波纹、假体破裂和再次手术率的几率无明显差异。在统计学上,光滑假体发生感染的几率明显较低。从统计学角度看,纹理假体发生血肿的几率明显更低。BREAST-Q 结果的比较显示两组之间没有差异。我们的结果表明,使用光滑假体的感染几率较低,而血肿形成的几率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Сharacteristic of Complications in Smooth and Textured Implants for Breast Modification Surgeries Performed in Women
The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare breast modification surgeries using smooth and textured implants in terms of a complication profile. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies reporting complication rates and quality of life on the BREAST-Q questionnaire in groups of patients with smooth and textured implants. The odds ratios of the following complications between the groups were calculated: capsular contracture, hematoma, infection, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates. And mean differences for BREAST-Q scores were also calculated. A meta-analysis of 14 studies was performed in this article. No significant differences were found in the odds of capsular contracture, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates between groups. The chance of developing infection was statistically significantly lower with smooth implants. The chance of hematoma development was statistically significantly lower with textured implants. Comparison of BREAST-Q results showed no difference between the groups. Our results suggest that using smooth implants is associated with a lower chance of infection and a higher chance of hematoma development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信