{"title":"女性乳房改造手术中光滑假体和纹理假体并发症的特点比较","authors":"Yusufov Stiven Ranbomovich, Yusufova Eteri Ranbomovna, Filimonov Dmitry Alekseevich, Ishchenko Roman Viktorovich","doi":"10.1177/07488068241253470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare breast modification surgeries using smooth and textured implants in terms of a complication profile. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies reporting complication rates and quality of life on the BREAST-Q questionnaire in groups of patients with smooth and textured implants. The odds ratios of the following complications between the groups were calculated: capsular contracture, hematoma, infection, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates. And mean differences for BREAST-Q scores were also calculated. A meta-analysis of 14 studies was performed in this article. No significant differences were found in the odds of capsular contracture, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates between groups. The chance of developing infection was statistically significantly lower with smooth implants. The chance of hematoma development was statistically significantly lower with textured implants. Comparison of BREAST-Q results showed no difference between the groups. Our results suggest that using smooth implants is associated with a lower chance of infection and a higher chance of hematoma development.","PeriodicalId":508479,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Сharacteristic of Complications in Smooth and Textured Implants for Breast Modification Surgeries Performed in Women\",\"authors\":\"Yusufov Stiven Ranbomovich, Yusufova Eteri Ranbomovna, Filimonov Dmitry Alekseevich, Ishchenko Roman Viktorovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07488068241253470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare breast modification surgeries using smooth and textured implants in terms of a complication profile. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies reporting complication rates and quality of life on the BREAST-Q questionnaire in groups of patients with smooth and textured implants. The odds ratios of the following complications between the groups were calculated: capsular contracture, hematoma, infection, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates. And mean differences for BREAST-Q scores were also calculated. A meta-analysis of 14 studies was performed in this article. No significant differences were found in the odds of capsular contracture, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates between groups. The chance of developing infection was statistically significantly lower with smooth implants. The chance of hematoma development was statistically significantly lower with textured implants. Comparison of BREAST-Q results showed no difference between the groups. Our results suggest that using smooth implants is associated with a lower chance of infection and a higher chance of hematoma development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068241253470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068241253470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Сharacteristic of Complications in Smooth and Textured Implants for Breast Modification Surgeries Performed in Women
The aim of this study is to comprehensively compare breast modification surgeries using smooth and textured implants in terms of a complication profile. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies reporting complication rates and quality of life on the BREAST-Q questionnaire in groups of patients with smooth and textured implants. The odds ratios of the following complications between the groups were calculated: capsular contracture, hematoma, infection, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates. And mean differences for BREAST-Q scores were also calculated. A meta-analysis of 14 studies was performed in this article. No significant differences were found in the odds of capsular contracture, malposition, seroma, breast rippling, implant rupture, and reoperation rates between groups. The chance of developing infection was statistically significantly lower with smooth implants. The chance of hematoma development was statistically significantly lower with textured implants. Comparison of BREAST-Q results showed no difference between the groups. Our results suggest that using smooth implants is associated with a lower chance of infection and a higher chance of hematoma development.