神经病理学确诊样本中两种血浆 p-tau217 实验室开发检验的阿尔茨海默病临床决策点

Anna Mammel, Ging-Yuek Robin, Ali Mousavi, Kelsey Hallett, Ian R MacKenzie, Veronica Hirsch-Reinshagen, Donald Biehl, Pradip Gill, Mary Encarnacion, Hans Frykman
{"title":"神经病理学确诊样本中两种血浆 p-tau217 实验室开发检验的阿尔茨海默病临床决策点","authors":"Anna Mammel, Ging-Yuek Robin, Ali Mousavi, Kelsey Hallett, Ian R MacKenzie, Veronica Hirsch-Reinshagen, Donald Biehl, Pradip Gill, Mary Encarnacion, Hans Frykman","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.27.24310872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of two commercial plasma p-tau217 immunoassays compared to CSF testing and neuropathology. METHODS: 170 plasma samples from University of British Columbia Hospital Clinic for Alzheimer's (AD) and Related Disorders were analyzed for p-tau217 using Fujirebio and ALZpath assays. Decision points were determined using CSF testing and autopsy findings as the standard. RESULTS: Fujirebio and ALZpath p-tau217 had similar overall analytical and clinical performance, with distinct decision points for each assay. Based on autopsy finding, both p-tau217 assays identified individuals with AD from other neurodegenerative diseases (ALZpath AUC = 0.94, Fujirebio AUC= 0.90). The ALZpath assay detected AD pathology at milder disease stages compared to the Fujirebio assay. DISCUSSION: Our study reinforces the clinical utility of plasma p-tau217 as an AD biomarker. Differences in test performance and clinical decision points suggest an assay specific diagnostic approach is required for plasma p-tau217 in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alzheimer's Disease clinical decision points for two plasma p-tau217 laboratory developed tests in neuropathology confirmed samples\",\"authors\":\"Anna Mammel, Ging-Yuek Robin, Ali Mousavi, Kelsey Hallett, Ian R MacKenzie, Veronica Hirsch-Reinshagen, Donald Biehl, Pradip Gill, Mary Encarnacion, Hans Frykman\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.27.24310872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of two commercial plasma p-tau217 immunoassays compared to CSF testing and neuropathology. METHODS: 170 plasma samples from University of British Columbia Hospital Clinic for Alzheimer's (AD) and Related Disorders were analyzed for p-tau217 using Fujirebio and ALZpath assays. Decision points were determined using CSF testing and autopsy findings as the standard. RESULTS: Fujirebio and ALZpath p-tau217 had similar overall analytical and clinical performance, with distinct decision points for each assay. Based on autopsy finding, both p-tau217 assays identified individuals with AD from other neurodegenerative diseases (ALZpath AUC = 0.94, Fujirebio AUC= 0.90). The ALZpath assay detected AD pathology at milder disease stages compared to the Fujirebio assay. DISCUSSION: Our study reinforces the clinical utility of plasma p-tau217 as an AD biomarker. Differences in test performance and clinical decision points suggest an assay specific diagnostic approach is required for plasma p-tau217 in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.27.24310872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.27.24310872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:我们评估了两种商用血浆p-tau217免疫测定与脑脊液检测和神经病理学相比的诊断性能。方法:使用 Fujirebio 和 ALZpath 检测法对不列颠哥伦比亚大学医院阿尔茨海默氏症(AD)及相关疾病诊所的 170 份血浆样本进行 p-tau217 分析。以脑脊液检测和尸检结果为标准确定决策点。结果:Fujirebio和ALZpath p-tau217的总体分析和临床表现相似,但每种检测方法都有不同的决定点。根据尸检结果,两种p-tau217检测方法都能从其他神经退行性疾病中鉴别出AD患者(ALZpath的AUC=0.94,Fujirebio的AUC=0.90)。与Fujirebio检测法相比,ALZpath检测法能在较轻的疾病阶段检测到AD病理变化。讨论:我们的研究加强了血浆p-tau217作为AD生物标记物的临床实用性。检测性能和临床决策点的差异表明,在临床实践中需要对血浆p-tau217采用特定的检测诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alzheimer's Disease clinical decision points for two plasma p-tau217 laboratory developed tests in neuropathology confirmed samples
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of two commercial plasma p-tau217 immunoassays compared to CSF testing and neuropathology. METHODS: 170 plasma samples from University of British Columbia Hospital Clinic for Alzheimer's (AD) and Related Disorders were analyzed for p-tau217 using Fujirebio and ALZpath assays. Decision points were determined using CSF testing and autopsy findings as the standard. RESULTS: Fujirebio and ALZpath p-tau217 had similar overall analytical and clinical performance, with distinct decision points for each assay. Based on autopsy finding, both p-tau217 assays identified individuals with AD from other neurodegenerative diseases (ALZpath AUC = 0.94, Fujirebio AUC= 0.90). The ALZpath assay detected AD pathology at milder disease stages compared to the Fujirebio assay. DISCUSSION: Our study reinforces the clinical utility of plasma p-tau217 as an AD biomarker. Differences in test performance and clinical decision points suggest an assay specific diagnostic approach is required for plasma p-tau217 in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信