胃源性腹膜同步转移患者的系统治疗策略和疗效:一项基于全国人口的研究。

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Niels A D Guchelaar, Bo J Noordman, Marion W Welten, Myron T van Santen, Micha J de Neijs, Stijn L W Koolen, Rob H A Verhoeven, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Pieter C van der Sluis, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Geert-Jan Creemers, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen
{"title":"胃源性腹膜同步转移患者的系统治疗策略和疗效:一项基于全国人口的研究。","authors":"Niels A D Guchelaar, Bo J Noordman, Marion W Welten, Myron T van Santen, Micha J de Neijs, Stijn L W Koolen, Rob H A Verhoeven, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Pieter C van der Sluis, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Geert-Jan Creemers, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative systemic treatment is currently standard of care for metastatic gastric cancer. However, patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin are often underrepresented in clinical studies due to unmeasurable radiologic disease. This study describes the systemic treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with peritoneal metastases in a nationwide real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and synchronous peritoneal metastases (with or without other metastases) diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure were determined and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to compare treatment groups, corrected for relevant tumor and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1,972 patients were included, of whom 842 (43%) were treated with palliative systemic therapy. The majority received capecitabine + oxaliplatin (CAPOX; 44%), followed by fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 19%), and epirubicin + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (EOX; 8%). Of the 99 (45%) patients who received second-line systemic treatment, ramucirumab + paclitaxel were administered most frequently (63%). After adjustment for sex, age, comorbidities, performance status, tumor location, Lauren classification, and the presence of metastases outside of the peritoneum, patients treated with a triplet containing docetaxel and those treated with a regimen containing trastuzumab had a significantly longer OS compared with patients treated with a doublet containing a fluoropyrimidine derivate + oxaliplatin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.91, and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91, respectively). Monotherapy was associated with a shorter OS (HR, 2.08, 95% CI, 1.53-2.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity in systemic treatment choices in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases in the Netherlands. In this study, patients treated with triplets containing docetaxel and with trastuzumab-containing regimens survived longer than patients who received doublet therapy. Despite this, median OS for all treatment groups remained below one year.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"405-412"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Patients With Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases of Gastric Origin: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Niels A D Guchelaar, Bo J Noordman, Marion W Welten, Myron T van Santen, Micha J de Neijs, Stijn L W Koolen, Rob H A Verhoeven, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Pieter C van der Sluis, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Geert-Jan Creemers, Bianca Mostert, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ron H J Mathijssen\",\"doi\":\"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative systemic treatment is currently standard of care for metastatic gastric cancer. However, patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin are often underrepresented in clinical studies due to unmeasurable radiologic disease. This study describes the systemic treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with peritoneal metastases in a nationwide real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and synchronous peritoneal metastases (with or without other metastases) diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure were determined and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to compare treatment groups, corrected for relevant tumor and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1,972 patients were included, of whom 842 (43%) were treated with palliative systemic therapy. The majority received capecitabine + oxaliplatin (CAPOX; 44%), followed by fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 19%), and epirubicin + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (EOX; 8%). Of the 99 (45%) patients who received second-line systemic treatment, ramucirumab + paclitaxel were administered most frequently (63%). After adjustment for sex, age, comorbidities, performance status, tumor location, Lauren classification, and the presence of metastases outside of the peritoneum, patients treated with a triplet containing docetaxel and those treated with a regimen containing trastuzumab had a significantly longer OS compared with patients treated with a doublet containing a fluoropyrimidine derivate + oxaliplatin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.91, and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91, respectively). Monotherapy was associated with a shorter OS (HR, 2.08, 95% CI, 1.53-2.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity in systemic treatment choices in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases in the Netherlands. In this study, patients treated with triplets containing docetaxel and with trastuzumab-containing regimens survived longer than patients who received doublet therapy. Despite this, median OS for all treatment groups remained below one year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"405-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:姑息性全身治疗是目前治疗转移性胃癌的标准方法。然而,胃癌腹膜转移患者由于放射学疾病无法测量,在临床研究中往往代表性不足。本研究描述了全国范围内腹膜转移患者的系统治疗策略和结果:方法:从荷兰全国范围内的癌症登记处确定2015年至2020年间在荷兰确诊的胃腺癌和同步腹膜转移(伴有或不伴有其他转移)患者。在对相关肿瘤和患者特征进行校正后,确定了中位总生存期(OS)和治疗失败时间,并使用多变量考克斯回归分析对治疗组进行了比较:共纳入了1972名患者,其中842人(43%)接受了姑息性系统治疗。大多数患者接受了卡培他滨+奥沙利铂治疗(CAPOX;44%),其次是氟尿嘧啶/亮紫杉醇/奥沙利铂治疗(FOLFOX;19%),以及表柔比星+卡培他滨+奥沙利铂治疗(EOX;8%)。在接受二线系统治疗的99名患者(45%)中,使用最多的是拉穆西单抗+紫杉醇(63%)。在对性别、年龄、合并症、表现状态、肿瘤位置、劳伦分类以及是否存在腹膜外转移进行调整后,与使用含氟嘧啶衍生物+奥沙利铂的三联疗法的患者相比,使用含多西他赛的三联疗法和含曲妥珠单抗的治疗方案的患者的OS明显更长(危险比[HR],0.69;95% CI,0.52-0.91;HR,0.68;95% CI,0.51-0.91)。单药治疗与较短的OS相关(HR,2.08,95% CI,1.53-2.83):结论:在荷兰,胃癌腹膜转移患者在选择全身治疗时存在很大的异质性。在这项研究中,接受含多西他赛的三联疗法和含曲妥珠单抗疗法的患者比接受双联疗法的患者存活时间更长。尽管如此,所有治疗组的中位生存期仍低于一年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Patients With Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases of Gastric Origin: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Background: Palliative systemic treatment is currently standard of care for metastatic gastric cancer. However, patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric origin are often underrepresented in clinical studies due to unmeasurable radiologic disease. This study describes the systemic treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with peritoneal metastases in a nationwide real-world setting.

Methods: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and synchronous peritoneal metastases (with or without other metastases) diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure were determined and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to compare treatment groups, corrected for relevant tumor and patient characteristics.

Results: In total, 1,972 patients were included, of whom 842 (43%) were treated with palliative systemic therapy. The majority received capecitabine + oxaliplatin (CAPOX; 44%), followed by fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 19%), and epirubicin + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (EOX; 8%). Of the 99 (45%) patients who received second-line systemic treatment, ramucirumab + paclitaxel were administered most frequently (63%). After adjustment for sex, age, comorbidities, performance status, tumor location, Lauren classification, and the presence of metastases outside of the peritoneum, patients treated with a triplet containing docetaxel and those treated with a regimen containing trastuzumab had a significantly longer OS compared with patients treated with a doublet containing a fluoropyrimidine derivate + oxaliplatin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.91, and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91, respectively). Monotherapy was associated with a shorter OS (HR, 2.08, 95% CI, 1.53-2.83).

Conclusions: There is substantial heterogeneity in systemic treatment choices in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases in the Netherlands. In this study, patients treated with triplets containing docetaxel and with trastuzumab-containing regimens survived longer than patients who received doublet therapy. Despite this, median OS for all treatment groups remained below one year.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信