伽玛刀放射外科治疗眼眶海绵状血管瘤:系统回顾和单臂荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1007/s11060-024-04723-1
Anuraag Punukollu, Brodus Franklin, Felipe Gutierrez Pineda, Kim Wouters, Lucca Palavani, David Hung-Chi Pan, Hsien-Chung Chen
{"title":"伽玛刀放射外科治疗眼眶海绵状血管瘤:系统回顾和单臂荟萃分析。","authors":"Anuraag Punukollu, Brodus Franklin, Felipe Gutierrez Pineda, Kim Wouters, Lucca Palavani, David Hung-Chi Pan, Hsien-Chung Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04723-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for orbital cavernous hemangioma (OCH) has emerged as a promising method due to its significant clinical improvement and low incidence of complications. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GKRS for the treatment of OCH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the PRISMA framework, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase for studies reporting outcomes of GKRS for OCH. Studies reporting complications, visual improvement, proptosis, tumor reduction rate, and tumor progression rate for OCH following GKRS were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies, out of 1856 search results, with 100 patients were included. Among them, only 5 minor complications were related to GKRS, including 3 with orbital pain and 2 with periorbital chemosis. Thus, the complication rate was 13% (95% CI, 7-25%). Visual acuity and visual field improvement rates after GKRS were 80% (95% CI, 63-96%) and 71% (95% CI, 47-95%) respectively. Proptosis improved in 94% of cases (95% CI, 83-100%). The tumor reduction rate was 77% after GKRS (95% CI, 69-85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GKRS for OCH appears to be a safe technique, as evidenced by the rate of clinical improvement and radiological improvement. However, studies are limited by an absence of a control group. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the relative efficacy of GKRS as compared with alternative surgical modalities for OCH.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gamma knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangioma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anuraag Punukollu, Brodus Franklin, Felipe Gutierrez Pineda, Kim Wouters, Lucca Palavani, David Hung-Chi Pan, Hsien-Chung Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-024-04723-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for orbital cavernous hemangioma (OCH) has emerged as a promising method due to its significant clinical improvement and low incidence of complications. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GKRS for the treatment of OCH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the PRISMA framework, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase for studies reporting outcomes of GKRS for OCH. Studies reporting complications, visual improvement, proptosis, tumor reduction rate, and tumor progression rate for OCH following GKRS were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies, out of 1856 search results, with 100 patients were included. Among them, only 5 minor complications were related to GKRS, including 3 with orbital pain and 2 with periorbital chemosis. Thus, the complication rate was 13% (95% CI, 7-25%). Visual acuity and visual field improvement rates after GKRS were 80% (95% CI, 63-96%) and 71% (95% CI, 47-95%) respectively. Proptosis improved in 94% of cases (95% CI, 83-100%). The tumor reduction rate was 77% after GKRS (95% CI, 69-85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GKRS for OCH appears to be a safe technique, as evidenced by the rate of clinical improvement and radiological improvement. However, studies are limited by an absence of a control group. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the relative efficacy of GKRS as compared with alternative surgical modalities for OCH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04723-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04723-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:伽玛刀放射外科手术(GKRS)治疗眼眶海绵状血管瘤(OCH)因其显著的临床改善和较低的并发症发生率而成为一种很有前景的方法。本研究旨在评估GKRS治疗OCH的安全性和有效性:根据 PRISMA 框架,我们在 PubMed、Cochrane Central 和 Embase 中检索了报告 GKRS 治疗 OCH 结果的研究。结果:在 1856 项检索中,有 6 项研究报告了 GKRS 治疗 OCH 后的并发症、视力改善、突眼、肿瘤缩小率和肿瘤进展率:结果:在 1856 项搜索结果中,共纳入了 6 项研究,涉及 100 名患者。结果:在1856条搜索结果中,有6项研究纳入了100名患者,其中只有5例轻微并发症与GKRS有关,包括3例眼眶疼痛和2例眶周化脓。因此,并发症发生率为 13%(95% CI,7-25%)。GKRS 后的视力和视野改善率分别为 80% (95% CI, 63-96%) 和 71% (95% CI, 47-95%)。94%的病例(95% CI,83%-100%)眼睑下垂得到改善。GKRS术后肿瘤缩小率为77%(95% CI,69-85%):结论:从临床改善率和放射学改善率来看,GKRS 治疗 OCH 似乎是一种安全的技术。然而,由于缺乏对照组,研究受到了限制。需要进行更多研究,以评估 GKRS 与其他手术方式治疗 OCH 的相对疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gamma knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangioma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangioma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Purpose: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for orbital cavernous hemangioma (OCH) has emerged as a promising method due to its significant clinical improvement and low incidence of complications. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GKRS for the treatment of OCH.

Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA framework, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase for studies reporting outcomes of GKRS for OCH. Studies reporting complications, visual improvement, proptosis, tumor reduction rate, and tumor progression rate for OCH following GKRS were included.

Results: Six studies, out of 1856 search results, with 100 patients were included. Among them, only 5 minor complications were related to GKRS, including 3 with orbital pain and 2 with periorbital chemosis. Thus, the complication rate was 13% (95% CI, 7-25%). Visual acuity and visual field improvement rates after GKRS were 80% (95% CI, 63-96%) and 71% (95% CI, 47-95%) respectively. Proptosis improved in 94% of cases (95% CI, 83-100%). The tumor reduction rate was 77% after GKRS (95% CI, 69-85%).

Conclusion: GKRS for OCH appears to be a safe technique, as evidenced by the rate of clinical improvement and radiological improvement. However, studies are limited by an absence of a control group. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the relative efficacy of GKRS as compared with alternative surgical modalities for OCH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信